Rec'd from Aussie friend, RE: Impeachment

[babylonsister]

Hi.
Is the above out of the question?

Apart from the guilt of killing so many Iraquis, Afghans and sundry, isn't it time this arse-hole was called to account for his crimes against humanity? Now, he has the deaths of countless Southern people on his mind, not conscience 'cos he doesn't have one.

Apologies to the Proctological community for equating him with an R-Sole; he would be more the puss that oozes from a punctured haemorrhoid!

Words fail this bystander in describing the pustulent hypocricy of your "valiant leader".

Hope you can help to rid of us of this pestilential, perennial parasite.

Peter the Rebel Forever.

[MadeinOhio]

1. We'll do it alright. Bush resign in disgrace you ass.

Resign and never look back, you incompetent piece of crap!
:grr:

[e-mail]

[skyimager]

2. Indict, Impeach, Imprison

What amazes me so much about this sociopath president is last year when the jack ass was trying to con the American people out their votes, he was in Florida just after a hurricane passing out water bottles and shaking hands.

[babylonsister]

3. Welcome to DU, skyimager! Don't forget the pains the blivet

went to last year were taken because his brother's state was affected, not because he gave a crap.

[SammyWinstonJack]

4. Election year vote getting.

That should painfully obvious to the people of the Gulf states affected by Katrina and Pinhead's incompetence. Welcome to DU.

[MadeinOhio]

5. Worthless photo-ops hoping conservatives bite. If not election fraud.n/t

[newyawker99]

7. Hi skyimager!!

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

[FreedomAngel82]

8. Yes

But why not New Orleans? People should realize this by now. We need to hammer this. Show how he showed up for Florida but left the people of New Orleans to die. All of this should be answered as well. Why did Bush wait three days to reply and address the nation?

[Jack Rabbit]

6. Hmmmm . . .

This kind of gross incompetence can fall into the "high crimes and misdemeanors" category.

Peter the Rebel throws me off a bit by calling it a crime against humanity. No, this is not a crime against humanity; the torture taking place in Mr. Bush's off shore network of gulags is a crime against humanity. To be a crime against humanity, one should expect a certain amount of maliciousness in the action which seems to be absent here. There was no real malice against any one in Bush's negligence of the federal government's role in disaster relief. He was simply favoring the rich over the poor by cutting taxes for the wealthy and cutting back federal spending to make up for it. It was short sighted, not malicious.

It seems that in Bush's America, the old national security goal of fighting and winning two major wars simultaneously is out the window, let alone the neoconservative goal of being able to fight multiple wars at once. This cannot be done while cutting taxes and still maintain security at home, which includes the ability to meet a major disaster like Hurricane Katrina. Bush has not even been able to fight and win in Afghanistan or Iraq with his agenda. Now we find that the effort to do so, while reducing government revenues at the same time, and still prepare for a major disaster and meet an emergency when it happens.

This can be the basis of an impeachment trial. Unfortunately, Congress is also complicit in this state of affairs, as it habitually approved Mr. Bush's tax cuts and wars. We should make it a priority to examine the voting records of our individual Congressman and consider voting him out of office in 2006 if it turns out that he blindly supported Mr. Bush's agenda for disaster.