Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oprah started a trend today, lots of dead bodies on MSNBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:20 PM
Original message
Oprah started a trend today, lots of dead bodies on MSNBC
On Scarborough Country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What does Oprah have to do with MSNBC? nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. On her show from the Gulf Coast today
She showed lots of the dead bodies in NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I still don't understand what that has to do with MSNBC. (nt0
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Umm, okay
I've been watching MSNBC lots throughout this whole thing and they haven't been showing that many dead bodies, tonight, they were doing close ups and part of a segment was nothing but moving images of the dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. NBC broadcast (Oprah's channel) and MSNBC one and the
same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. She's not on NBC in my neck of the woods
She's on ABC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. She's on NBC in mine. I think her HARPO productions does
sell to other markets. I don't understand all this corporate media switcherooing anyway. I do think she is pretty much NBC which is why MSNBC picked up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. In VA, she's ABC all the way. How odd! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Oprah did a show today
She went to New Orleans and into the Superdome and talked with some officials (the Mayor). One of the doctors she spoke with discussed the fact that those that were dying were put into the morgue. There simply wasn't anything they could do to help them, so they were just left to die. In the morgue.

She showed bodies. I think that was the OP's point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah but...
What does that have to do with MSNBC? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. "Yeah but..."
What does that have to do with Oprah? ;) :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. HA! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush's career is over now.
Scarborough has nothing to gain by supporting him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Drip, drip, drip, drip. The tide seems to be turning ... a tiny bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Extended NBC Nightly News....
did a segment on St. Gabriel, LA tonight. Showed semis that brought the dead to an enormous warehouse in this little town. And interviewed the pathologists who will try to figure out who they are. Problem is that DNA matching may be impossible because sources of evidence (think hairbrushes, combs and toothbrushes) are lost. Possibly forever.

A horrendous task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. One hope might be through DNA of relatives.
Still a daunting task, no doubt, but there is a way to match characteristics through DNA.


Hi greatauntoftriplets! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. If the bodies are Does
how will they match the DNA with the families?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. As I said, a daunting task.
Maybe too big a task, even if a capable person was to head it up. I was thinking of the scenario where survivors who cannot locate family can donate their DNA, and then the labs can try matching it to the DOEs. Yeah, long shot just because of what I fear will be the shear number of dead. I guess if it were me, I would want to know one way or the other if my family member was still alive and missing, or among the dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. if they create a database of DNA from bodies which can't
otherwise be identified, and of DNA from people missing relatives, they can see what the close matches are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Ahh! Yes, that makes sense.
Unfortunately, I fear whole families have been wiped out, so we'll never know who some of the dead are. Like that group of 22 people who were found tied together in the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. It definitely would not work in situations such as the 22 bodies.
But in whatever case an identification may be made, I think it should be attempted. After all, so many of these folks have already lost nearly everything. Finding out that a family member has died would be additional agony, for sure, but I wonder if NOT finding out would be worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. True, but they have to find the relatives as well.
The task is daunting.

:hi: SeattleGirl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Damn. The trucks.
A fucking convoy of tractor trailers!

Just to transport the dead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Sadly.....
there seems to be no other way to do it.

They had to do pretty much the same thing in Chicago in 1995 when 700 died in extreme heat. They were stored in refrigerated trucks until the dead could be autopsied. It was horrendous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. And then there are living relatives that a cheek swab will
reveal DNA, not today, not tomorrow, but in the future, so I do hope they take DNA samples before they bury these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I hope so too...
This whole situation is FUBAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. They're supposed to do DNA sampling but who's to say (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Chilling and sad to see the dead, but they must be seen ...
... no way should this be whitewashed by the gov't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. We should be seeing the dead coming
back from Iraq, too... but they've managed to keep that out of the news.

It's typical of this regime... out of sight, out of mind. Least that's how they think the public operates. I think they are in for a rude awakening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Randi Rhodes was saying that they weren't...
going to do autopsies... they were just going to bury the dead in a mass grave and create a memorial (that way, they wouldn't have to have an exact number of the dead). Is there any truth to this?? It sounds like a very Joseph Stalin thing to do... but it wouldn't surprise me is Bush did do this. Better to deny families closure to their grief of losing a loved one, than let the world know just how many people died from his neglect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. The thing about mass graves is this
In NO, you CANNOT bury bodies in the ground, just exactly because of this. Because NO is so far below the sea level, any kind of flooding will make the bodies surface, so they shouldn't be using mass graves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. I watched Oprah
I cried the whole hour. I've never seen so much misery and suffering in my life. Bu$h and his demons need to GO. To let these idiots stay another 3 years is unacceptable. Anyone else would be going through impeachment. It's not fair for him to run rampant and break all the rules and laws and not be held accountable.It's going to take a peaceful revolution with blacks AND whites joining together.We need MILLIONS marching....not thousands....MILLIONS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC