mopaul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 10:51 AM
Original message |
Katrinagate? or FEMAgate? |
|
have to get just the right name for the latest bush scandal
|
maine_raptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
"Yet another Bush Fuck-up"
Must be said while shaking your head in sadness.
|
MadAsHellNewYorker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
2. FEMAgate seems to absolve bush. Katrinagate in my book. n/t |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 10:54 AM by MadAsHellNewYorker
|
all.of.me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
|
because you keep the emphasis on where it belongs.
Katrina was going to happen anyway, but it is the delayed response that was the problem.
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
5. It is Bush's scandal, not FEMAs. He put the incompetents in there. |
|
All you had to do was watch TV to know people were unnecessarily dying from he Governments lack of response.
It is bigger then FEMA. I don't want it to be phrased in any way that limits how high the fault lies within the Federal Government. The fault lies with Bush.
|
donsu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
6. this is bigger then a gate |
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
the whole frigging thing is the problem. The removal of any single agency or person will do nothing to 'fix' our problems. It is those in government that made choices that favor money over mankind that need to go.
|
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |
8. How ironic that this is the REAL "Water"gate |
|
but my vote would be for "Slaughter-gate"
|
chaulieu
(11 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I think it is time to stop using the "-gate" suffix to frame scandals. I think there has been a desire to use it to put emphasis on the seriousness of the alleged wrong doing.
The scandal of federal action and inaction that allowed the post-Katrina destruction of New Orleans is bigger than Watergate. A better historical precedent would be the floods of 1927.
|
all.of.me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. why was watergate called watergate? |
|
any idea?
i agree, the '-gate' thing is redundant, but just by reading the name of whatever scandal it is, you immediately know what's up. i wonder if anyone would pay attention if scandals were named something else. then again, that new name may stick, the way -gate has.
|
cmd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
With liberal use of the guitar pickin' moran
|
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Not FEMAgate. That lays the disastrous failure on Browny. Murdergate? |
Tari
(215 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
Bernardo de La Paz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Floodgate is best: Reminds of Watergate and has euphony. |
|
Floodgate. After all, it was the flood that was the worst.
Floodgate is to Bush as Watergate is to Nixon.
Floodgate has nice visual imagery for cartoonists to play with.
Katrinagate is too contrived. FEMAgate is too limited since it lets Bush and Chertoff off the hook.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message |