Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are the feds in NO now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:08 PM
Original message
Are the feds in NO now?
I ask because their excuse was they had to wait to be asked before they could go in. If they are in there now, was it by invitation or when do they CLAIM they were asked?

God, I hope somebody understands what I'm trying to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. They had to be ordered. And there were no orders. And yes, they are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are blaming the governor for not asking the feds.
I know that she did. What I'm trying to say is they said she never requested help. But, now they are there. Do they now claim she requested the help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Here you go:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The proof is in the request.
Yes, they were claiming that. It spun away and then the request appeared. Like everything else they do to smear someone, they let the misinformation circulate until it becomes gospel. Then no one listens to the facts.

The aid was there and waiting as we all know. After she declared the state of emergency, the (p)Resident declared a state of emergency. Then the Federal government sat around and tried to figure out who was in charge. In the meantime, aid was refused and people died.

Criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who do you mean by "the feds"?
Some "feds" were deployed before landfall. The problem wasn't "who's here" as much as "who's in charge?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC