I Like Hillary's Logo-- 2008?

[BamaLefty]

It sure beats the Kerry/Edwards one of last year. Sadly for us, its looking like this will be the one we will see in 2008 every day of the year. Good logo-- I just wish we could replace the name. I'd love to see "CLARK" there instead. Oh well. . .

[billbuckhead]

1. The rumour has always been that you will see Clinton-Clark

[Soup Bean]

3. Disastrous. No more Clintons.

Clark is just fine. Hillary can't win, and will mobilize a lot of people who don't normally donate to Republicans or participate in politics at all to vote against Democrats.

I think she's a good person, but I really believe she's too polarizing, and would really cause the Democrats to lose an election that should be won in 2008. There's plenty of time for someone besides her to become frontrunner. I don't believe in either her ineveitablity or her electability.

She's the Republican Dream Candidate. They spend so much time fantasizing about her beooming president, and would be very energized to beat her. I don't think even Bill can help her win a national election.

[redsoxliberal]

10. agree strongly.

[SaveElmer]

12. Disagree Strongly

Hillary is our best bet in 2008!!!

[Soup Bean]

14. In the evil, parallel universe, perhaps.

I wonder if they will all have goatees?

[Raydawg1234]

19. I dont know about Hillary but......

I dont know about Hillary, but this time lets try to pick somone who was not in the secret society Skull and Bones. For those of you who do not know, Kerry is a member of the same secret society as GWB. Not to be a Conspiracy mongerer, but this is just to good to be true.

Here's a 60 minutes segment on it: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5244.htm

[BamaLefty]

4. Interesting

Kind of an odd mix there. You have an upstanding woman and a 4 star general. Kinda cool. I'd like it a lot better (a Hillary run) if the General was the VP nominee.

[Clark2008]

5. It should be the other way around.

Put the CinC as CinC and the senator in charge of the Senate.

Duh.

[BlueEyedSon]

7. "always"?

LOL!

[mirror wall]

2. Nominating Hillary would be an umitigated disaster.

No way will they do that. Unless they are very very stupid or deliberately trying to lose.

Not that I hate her; I'm lukewarm on her really.

The populace at large, however, even many Democrats, dislike her strongly.

[walldude]

6. Agreed, she can't possibly win

which is why all the right wingers have been trying to push her as the candidate..

[BlueEyedSon]

8. NO MORE DYNASTIC PRESIDENCIES, PLEASE!

[Skip Intro]

9. And what was wrong with the Kerry/Edwards logo?

why wouldn't red-staters wonder if one of those three stars in Hillary's logo reperesented them?

[BamaLefty]

11. It Looked Weak

and indecisive-- like the candidate the GOP liked to push.

Bush's was forward looking, tough, and optimistic-- like the GOP tried to push. :(

[Skip Intro]

15. I totally don't get what you're saying.

how was bush/cheney "forward looking" and Kerry/Edwards was not?

I'm not at all seeing what you're seeing.

[ISUGRADIA]

16. Check out this link for an analysis of the Bush v Kerry logos

from the NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2004/10/08/opinion/20041009_opart2.html

[Skip Intro]

17. In My Humble Opinion, that NYT graphic, posted here, is utter bullshit.

"Unimaginative use of flag is neither inspirational nor aspirational" - ?????!!!!!!!

I beg to differ....

[thebigidea]

21. "the very aggressive flag" conveyed goddamn SS bolts turned sideways

might as well have gone for the skulls.

[BamaLefty]

18. See The Link That Was Posted

That is what I mean. . .

[Crazy Guggenheim]

13. I'll bet she doesn't run.

[AgadorSparticus]

20. I agree. Enough of Hillary. I've washed my hands of her. Clark has

my vote. Unless someone more progressive decides to run. :)