Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina Communications May Have Been Affected By Solar Storm (NOAA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:24 AM
Original message
Katrina Communications May Have Been Affected By Solar Storm (NOAA)
From http://www.noaa.com/

NOAA ISSUES SPACE WEATHER WARNING;
POWERFUL SOLAR FLARE ERUPTS
KATRINA COMMUNICATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN AFFECTED

Forecasters at the NOAA Space Environment Center in Boulder, Colo., Wednesday observed one of the largest solar flares on record at 1:40 p.m. EDT. The forecasters are predicting significant solar eruptions in the coming days. Agencies impacted by space weather storms may experience disruptions over the next two weeks. These include spacecraft operations, electric power systems, high frequency communications and low-frequency navigation systems.

MORE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um
How could communications last week have been affected by a solar flare YESTERDAY? When you read the whole article, there is nothing about Katrina-related communications. Methinks someone is trying to provide further cover for Bushco's fuckup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. This is not the first or only flare up lately
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 07:32 AM by theHandpuppet
Further on in the article...

"The very active Region 808 produced a powerful X-17 flare (R4, severe radio blackout, on the NOAA space weather scales), which was observed on the NOAA GOES satellite. "This flare, the fourth largest in the last 15 years, erupted just as the Region 808 sunspot cluster was rotating onto the visible disk of the sun," said Larry Combs, solar forecaster at the NOAA Space Environment Center. Intense radio emissions were also associated with this flare. A very bright and fast coronal mass ejection was observed on coronagraph imagery. However, the material was not Earth directed. Over the past two weeks, this active region has produced a series of significant solar eruptions as it made its passage around the back side of the sun with minor impacts. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, but...
can solar flares on "the back side of the sun" have the same distruptive effects as those facing us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I wouldn't think so
But perhaps there's a scientist here who can tell us if there's been any recent solar activity which might have effected earth's communications. The title of the article would leave one to believe the recent solar activity already HAS affected comunications. (past tense)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt that affected anything yet
I work at a place that's a (24/7) heavy user of industrial two-way FM. We've noticed a tiny bit of interference this week (which is probably not even related to the solar storm), but no service interruptions to speak of. I'm the guy they call to fix things when they break, so I'd know if there was interference -- but there's been no serious problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. How long does it take for effects of this kind to reach Earth?
I'm no scientist so I'd be interested in the rule of scientific thumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. About eight minutes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hmm...93 million miles at the speed of light?
I think it's about eight minutes delay. (just went and looked it up -- it says 8 minutes, 19 seconds).

http://www.sunspot.noao.edu/sunspot/pr/answerbook/light.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. But what does the speed of light have to do with solar mass ejections?
Solar "light" is not the same as the solar wind, which is what affects communications systems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well, I'm pretty sure it's the radiation that causes the interference
...Not the actual matter from a solar mass ejection. The radiation would travel at the speed of light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:46 AM
Original message
Thanks!
Thanks for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. So now they are going to blame the SUN. Amazing! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. they'll try !!!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. I would think it would be very difficult for a solar flare to affect....
...communications BEFORE it erupts from the surface of the sun.

This story is total BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. More communications problems reported by NOAA
See NOAA home page for link

NOAA Weather Radio Status:

Commercial power and partial telecommunications to the Slidell Forecast Office have been restored. However, broadcast from the following sites has not yet been confirmed: Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Gulfport, Buras, Morgan City, and Bogalusa.

Bude and Rose Hill (Meridian) in Mississippi continue to be hampered by telcommunications failures.

One transmitter is down in the Mobile area due to telecommunications problems.

Five transmitters are down in the Lake Charles area due to telcommunications problems.

Two transmitters are down in Shreveport area due to telcommunications problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Could this be because the antennas were carried away by Katrina?
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 07:55 AM by BiggJawn
And the Gennies have finally run out of fuel?

I would think that getting NOAA Weather Radio back on the air is not a high priority item this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. I seriously doubt "official" communications were affected.
Almost all Public Safety radios operate on the VHF and UHF part of the spectrum, from about 150 Mhz all the way up to 800Mhz. The State Police MIGHT still be on the lower frequency of 42 Mhz.

Solar events have almost NO effect at these frequencies. If anything, there may have been some confusion as the twisting of the Ionosphere let them hear radio traffic from over the horizon, since VHF and higher frequencies are usually line-of-sight only.

The biggest effect would have been to the HF (3-30 Mhz) part of the spectrum, and indeed, I was listening last night and it was rough, the SATERN network on 14 Mcs. was not heard here, and the Gulf Coast Network on 3 Mcs. was very weak, but they were "Gittin'-R-Dun".

The operators in the HF spectrum who operate the various Ham and SHARES radio networks are a resourceful bunch, and if one frequency doesn't work, plans are already in place to try alternate frequencies until they find one that does works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. right... and it didn't affect communications elsewhere?
how odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC