Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

there's a FEMA censorship story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 02:18 PM
Original message
there's a FEMA censorship story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is not a "ban" in the traditional sense
they have asked media outlets to comply, but it's voluntary. Where it's a de facto ban is in the ability to procure those photos to begin with:

/snip
But on Tuesday, FEMA refused to take reporters and photographers along on boats seeking victims in flooded areas, saying they would take up valuable space need in the recovery effort and asked them not to take pictures of the dead.

In an e-mail explaining the decision, a FEMA spokeswoman wrote: "The recovery of victims is being treated with dignity and the utmost respect and we have requested that no photographs of the deceased by made by the media."

/end snip

but it's still bullshit. Listen up journalists, you guys need to do your job and report reality, complete with photos. If you don't, then you're not a real journalist and you might as well just sit at home and make up the news, if you don't already.

Remember, the people who are asking this favor of you are responsible for the very corpses they're trying to hide. Don't be part of the cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, no no. Request no PRINTING. More: FEMA might deny access...
...willy nilly. "Oh, that camera's too large. You cannot pass."

It's up to the journalists to decide what is appropriate, and Congress. Not some lower level government official with a chip on his shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Leave it to the Heritage Foundation....
Late in the article:

Mark Tapscott, a former editor at the Washington Times newspaper who now deals with media issues at the Heritage Foundation, said the FEMA decision did not amount to censorship.

"Let's not make a common decency issue into a censorship issue," Tapscott said. "Nobody wants to wake up in the morning and see their dead uncle on the front page. That's just common decency."


You're right Mr. Tapscott. It is about common decency. Nobody want to see their dead uncle's abandoned corpse lying on the road ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC