Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Christian Wire: "Arnold will TERMINATE same -sex 'marriage' bill"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 02:36 PM
Original message
Christian Wire: "Arnold will TERMINATE same -sex 'marriage' bill"


To: National Desk

Contact: Stacey Holliday of Concerned Women for America, 202-488-7000 ext. 126

WASHINGTON, Sept. 8 /Christian Wire Service/ -- Concerned Women for America (CWA) applauds Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) for his promise to veto a bill that, if signed, would have legalized homosexual "marriage" in California.

"Gov. Schwarzenegger has done the right thing in promising to veto this illegal bill. It's evidence that CWA of California and other pro-family groups got their message through to him: 'We don't want counterfeit marriage,'" said Robert Knight, director of CWA's Culture & Family Institute. "The California Constitution clearly states that the Legislature cannot overturn a Proposition vote unless they put another Proposition on the topic to the voters, who spoke loudly and clearly with Proposition 22 in 2000 that they want marriage to remain marriage. The liberals don't dare put it to the people again for a vote, so they keep trying to do end-runs.

"We're also pleased that the governor vetoed two other pro-homosexual bills. One of them effectively would have silenced pro-family candidates on issues of sexual morality, and the other would have hampered efforts to collect petition signatures to put a state constitutional amendment protecting marriage on the ballot."

Knight concluded: "Clearly, the liberal Democrats in the Legislature don't trust the people anymore, and are doing their best to enact a radical, anti-family agenda with the help of out-of-control judges, like San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer, who couldn't find a single reason to keep marriage as the union of a man and a woman when he struck down Prop. 22 in March . It's time for Californians to take a hard look at what the liberals are doing to them, or at least trying to do to them."

Concerned Women for America (CWA) is the nation's largest public policy women's organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. that out of control judge is Catholic and a Republican
I would hardly call him a liberal

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Accuracy doesn't matter to these people. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the more I think about the veto
the more pissed off I get

Ahnuld's reasoning is bullshit--the whole "the legislature is overriding the people's wishes"

Prop 22 was passed back in 2000

we've had a couple of years to see that same sex marriages haven't brought the end of the world to Canada and Massachusetts

I thought the legislature was supposed to be the people's voice and it spoke on this issue

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If you put racial equality to a vote...
I think the "people" would decide not to offer equal rights in a few states. The 'people's wishes' are not a valid argument to rights issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that's one of the reasons I really don't like the referendum process
I don't like the idea of people voting on constitutional amendments influenced by 30 second commercials, which are usually their sole source of information on the subject

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree, dwickham.
I don't like the referendum process at all.

Amending the Constitution should take 2/3 of the elected legislators - period.


Referendums that are merely legislation should require a popular vote AND approval by some percentage of the legislators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He's following orders like all good, "you know whats" do.
He didn't get to be governor because he was popular. Now he has to pay back. Never mind the lies he told before. Lie first, obey next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC