Must_B_Free
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:22 PM
Original message |
|
who would you prefer in 08?
|
blonndee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Gore. He was elected, after all. nt |
Melodybe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
42. Gore, cause he understands the future: global warming, the internet, etc |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 11:40 PM by Melodybe
Hillary is too DLC for me.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Somebody with a chance of winning |
|
Neither of them will do that
|
walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
14. LOL.. that was my thought... |
|
How about Olberman, he's got as much chance as Hillary..
|
crispini
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
Michydem
(29 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
19. DEAN....Hillary won't win...that is just a resignation in my eyesnt |
Autumn Colors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
and would love more than anything to see him in the White House, but Hillary has the advantage of reminding all the non-wealthy people that they were doing much better while a Clinton was in the White House ... so why not another one?
How about Hillary for pres and Dean for VP? (or Hillary with Gore as VP)
|
Mein Bush
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
38. Gore already won! Hillary as Al's VP!!! |
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
50. Past tense. He wouldn't manage it again. |
|
And the BBV and courts are still a problem, only worse after the Supremes get the BUSHCO treatment.
|
Mein Bush
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
64. So how can these scum be driven from office? |
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
76. Job 1 = get varifiable ballots EVERYWHERE |
|
Job 2 = Hold media accountable for spinning to a particular party and force fairness doctrine and put liars like Rush out on their asses.
Job 3 = Get more of the American public educated and involved in political decisions. Help your neighbors see that some things just have to be faced and we do it better together as a people. Waiting for someone to do something is not how democracy works. That someone is and always will be We the People. Get schools to teach government/civics as requirements again.
|
Mein Bush
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #76 |
82. havocmom, you're 100% on the money! |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 01:24 AM by Mein Bush
What has become of Black Box Voting?
Unfortunately, if the cheats "win" again, another civil war would be justified.
At least if our side lost we wouldn't be under the delusion of being a part of a democracy.
|
Sarojin
(50 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
|
Many a folk are looking back with longing at the Clinton years of prosperity and GOP whining about sex instead of well, gay sex.
|
AlGore-08.com
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
47. Gore has proven he can win - - under nearly impossible circumstances |
|
He began his campaign one month after the attempted impeachment of Clinton ended.
He started out 20 points behind Smirk.
He was outspent nearly 2 to 1.
He had the most hostile press coverage in modern history.
He had almost no support from the Democratic party.
Despite all that, he won.
|
Pepperbelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
98. who might that be? nt |
scarletwoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
joanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I just love that man!
Clinton has no chance whatsoever in my opinion.
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
20. I'll third Russ Feingold |
|
He means what he says and says what he means.
|
Alizaryn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
greendog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
Aristus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Clinton/Gore again. (It was so great the first time!)
Or Gore/Clinton. Al has earned the Presidency. It's about time he took office.
|
Blue Belle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
24. I'd go with a Gore/Clinton ticket... |
|
either Clinton would do...
|
Mein Bush
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
66. Man! Bill as VP would be a hoot! |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 12:55 AM by Mein Bush
Have you checked you're IQ score lately? To me, this concept is pure genius. It would be a great way to keep the right-wing-freak-show occupied.
P.S. For example, Ken Starr could be appointed to go after Bill's 'food for tsunami relief' program!
|
Crazy Guggenheim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
70. One problem. Bill can't run for V.P. It's in order of succession. |
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #70 |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 01:04 AM by charlie
He's forbidden to be elected again, but the Constitution is silent on the matter of his replacing an incapacitated President. As far as I know, there's no prohibition against his placement as veep on a ticket.
|
Brightmore
(293 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #75 |
77. Doesn't the Veep have to satisfy the same |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 01:17 AM by Brightmore
constitutional qualifications as the President? Meaning, the VP must be eligible to be POTUS?
|
Mein Bush
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #77 |
81. This is a great question. I for one don't know. (n/t) |
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #77 |
83. You're right, I was wrong |
|
Amendment 12 forbids someone ineligible for POTUS to become Vice President.
|
silverweb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
silverweb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
smartvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
73. I'll take Gore/Clark. nt |
Graf Orlok
(441 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
KaryninMiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Al Gore- but I'd be fine with Hillary as VP . But, I'll always be |
w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
without a single doubt, if he were to announce today, at this point in time, he'd be my candidate...
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
10. If Gore has rethought his position on free trade, I'd rather vote for Gore |
|
If I am strictly limited to those two, then it's Gore; otherwise, I may as well look at third party candidates again.
|
Pam-Moby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
loudsue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Not even in the same universe: GORE BY A LIGHT YEAR! |
Scout1071
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Gore. No doubt about it. |
FlemingsGhost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
16. No, thanks. I'll go Green. (n/t) |
TexanDem
(786 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Gore!! Hillary seems to be inching closer to right, don't you think? |
5X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. She done jumped over the fence. n/t |
Sarojin
(50 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
80. more like side-stepping than inching. |
Mein Bush
(171 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
84. Didn't W move to the center with his "compassionate conserv'ism" crap? n/t |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 01:28 AM by Mein Bush
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Gore/Kucinich would make my heart happy. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 11:30 PM by TahitiNut
:party: Bernie Sanders for Secretary of Labor. Paul Krugman for Secretary of the Treasury. Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State.
|
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
A vacation from watching the scoundrels... actually having a life outside of politics... wow, what a concept!
|
mithnanthy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Gore/Kucinich would be great!
|
CountDmoney
(61 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
shireen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message |
25. neither. WES CLARK 2008! n/t |
jim3775
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message |
jbm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd love a Hillary presidency eventually, but the next one belongs to Gore.
|
The Crazy Canadian
(260 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
28. I get the feeling that she's a bit neoconish. |
Sugarcoated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
35. Wes Clark is who I want to run |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 11:37 PM by Sugarcoated
I would feel safe and secure in this country with him as president - I miss that feeling. (It's been so rare, now that I think about it) And I think he'd handle the Rethug smear machine very well.
And of the two choices given, I'd go for Gore.
|
Alizaryn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Between those two choices, |
|
Gore, hands down. I dont think we stand a prayer of him putting himself through it again though.
|
Must_B_Free
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
43. Come one - it's the ultimate comeback story |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 11:41 PM by Must_B_Free
quite literally, Al Gore was right about everything he said versus Bush in the debates.
Bush, consequently has led the country in to ruin and devistation - we are now the laughingstock of the world community.
Al Gore can be the political Rocky. People love a comeback and if you were PROVEN right by history, you can do it.
Pretty hard to sell "Al Gore is a liar" now isn't it?
|
Alizaryn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
CantGetFooledAgain
(635 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Let the man take his rightful place.
Seeing him concede was one of the saddest moments of my life. He was so wise and gracious.
He deserves to assume the office that he won by the majority vote of the American people and his true victory in the electoral college.
|
VADem11
(783 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
of course. I would love for him to run.
|
Autumn Colors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I say Hillary for Pres. with running mate Al Gore...
|
txindy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Between those two? Gore. Easily.
|
stevietheman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Of those two, Gore by a mile. But I really prefer Clark. n/t |
One_of_8
(289 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
49. My first choice is Clark |
|
and whomever he would select as running mate. I doubt Gore would accept an offer to run as VP, and I hope it wouldn't be Hillary. This is nothing against either Gore or Clinton - but I want a winning ticket, with a candidate I would be glad to vote for, not one I grudgingly vote for because I would never vote Repub.
I admire Clark, I think he would be a great leader, and has a chance of uniting the nation more fully than it has been in years. Hillary does not have that option - she is too fully hated by the Right. Gore is a good man, but I don't think he has what it takes to energize people. He comes across as wooden and wonkish.
Would love a combo of Clark and Boxer.
|
Outer_Limit
(99 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
However, I'd much rather seek a third option.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
41. DEM Senators need to stay IN THE SENATE |
|
we gotta get more of them in there, not run one again who has too much of a record to work against them in a campaign.
|
Autumn Colors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
44. Also need moderate Reps to go independent!!! |
|
Even one or two of them would help...
|
Diane R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
45. President Gore...he has already shown he can be elected. |
|
The man was cheated out of the presidency by one of the most immoral men in history. It makes me so upset to think how our world would be different if we had our real president.
|
Autumn Colors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message |
46. How about Gore & Dean??? n/t |
FyurFly
(512 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |
noahmijo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |
51. Gore/Clark or Clark/Gore |
halobeam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
crispini
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
AmericanDream
(714 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message |
Melodybe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
55. Screw Hillary, she is a corporatist waste of time. |
|
She is of, by, and for the corporations, don't trust her.
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 11:58 PM by FreedomAngel82
Definitley Al! While I like Hillary I don't think it's her time. We need someone very progressive to clean up after all of this mess! Hillary isn't quite so progressive.
|
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-09-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
59. I'd have to go with Gore. |
|
I don't trust Hillary.
Peace.
|
Meldread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message |
60. Gore/Clark - Screw Hillary ____ n/t |
Ladyhawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message |
61. Gore. By far. I just don't like Hillary. Sorry. n/t |
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
if i ever vote for her it will only be the lesser of two evils.
|
Kazak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He IS going to run, isn't he?
|
Borgnine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message |
65. Al Gore is fucking hardcore. |
|
He made two mistakes in 2000: he let himself get handled by dipshits (that went on to handle Kerry), and he picked Lieberman as a running mate. Subtract those two things from the equation, and whoa nelly!
Gore/Clark 2008. Visualize it!
|
tinrobot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
67. The one with the spine - GORE |
|
He would mop the floor with anyone the GOP nominates.
|
titoresque
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message |
68. I'd prefer a real election |
|
sadly.......there will be no *election* in 2008
|
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Though Clark would be my #1 pick.
|
growlypants
(846 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message |
71. Gore. Hillary has zero chance. |
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Hands down. No hesitation.
|
NNadir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm not convinced at all that my vote will actually be counted, but I will go through the motions for Gore.
|
Sarojin
(50 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message |
78. Gore, he's more left and more enviro friendly n/t |
Douglas Carpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:35 AM
Response to Original message |
85. between those two, Al Gore of course |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 02:25 AM by Douglas Carpenter
Frankly, I think Al Gore would have by the far the strongest possibility of winning -- also he has positioned himself more with progressive forces while Hillary seems to be doing the opposite
|
artemisia1
(343 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message |
87. The one of the two who stayed faithful. Take a guess who I mean? nt |
drummo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #87 |
artemisia1
(343 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
countingbluecars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
would be a great ticket. Together they would bring a wealth of needed experience in many areas; environmental, military, diplomacy, etc.
|
vernon_nackulus
(42 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
91. Al Gore: The Once and Future President |
|
Al Gore, hands down the most electable Democrat in the Nation and a man who does honor to his country every day he breaths.
|
lutefisk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
93. Gore- How can right wing/media attack him this time? |
|
He was right about pretty much everything he predicted, and correctly warned the country about what Republican rule would mean. Bush, Inc. (and the Republican media) have been wrong about everything. At this point, I can't imagine a candidate more likely to get elected.
|
bmbmd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
94. Al Gore is the man to rescue America. |
|
I remember immediately after 9/11 when all my Texas buddies were thanking God daily that Bush was the pres instead of Gore. They would sayNow aren't you glad Bush won?" I would reply, of course, that 9/11 would not have happened under Gore. They looked at me like I was crazy. Now, five years later, as Bush has climbed to staggering new levels of incompetence, they are not so sure.
|
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
95. Prometheus Gore over anybody! n/t |
VOX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
97. Gore would be a terrific candidate. n/t |
laruemtt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
100. Gore. He seems to have shaken off the DLC crap. |
|
Unlike Hillary. I held my nose and voted for Gore in '00. Something I won't do if Hillary or some of the other pro-war Dems should be nominated.
|
JNelson6563
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
nansocal
(181 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
ultraist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
104. Neither although it was awesome of Gore to help with rescue efforts |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
105. Gore NO MORE CLINTONS |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |