NRaleighLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:46 PM
Original message |
Confused about Cheney's Texas babble - he was having an |
|
on air orgasm discussing the Texas storm planning - saw simulations showing what would happen if a bit one came in, models of flooding, etc. Wasn't there a CD of a simulation of a Cat 4/5 hitting NO well prior to the storm? In fact, it was ignored by FEMA and they acted surprised it was so bad (duh!) If so, why was big dick not challenged...what's so special about the Texas demo??? I know...I am trying to use logic and look for meaning from someone incapable of either.
|
mistertrickster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Why, oh why, couldn't it have hit Houston? Would the planning have |
|
been better if a cat 5 hurricane were headed straight for the red heart of the red states?
I don't think so. Bush is too incompetent to even protect his own.
|
jean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. yes, it was called Hurricane Pam and was finished last year |
|
This site has an interactive chart, very graphic example what a Cat 3 hurrican would do to NO http://www.nd.edu/~adcirc/pam.htmHurricane Pam Exercise Concludes http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=13051FEMA's Pam simulation foretold Katrina disaster http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/defenseandsecurity/a/femapam.htm
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |