CNN -POLL Should President have been on the ground in New Orleans sooner?

[demo dutch]

64% Yes-
36% No ???? Are they nuts!!

http://www.cnn.com/ ( scroll down)

[blonndee]

1. Link

http://www.cnn.com

[MadAsHellNewYorker]

2. humm, he was on the ground 1.5 days after charlie...

oh wait that was an election year and it was in his brother's state :eyes:

[texpatriot2004]

3. These polls are great. n/t

[Der Blaue Engel]

4. 36% is all that remains of his supporters

Still disgusting and scary that even that number would stand behind this criminal...but the numbers are plummeting.

[rogerashton]

5. I voted no.

What the hell good is HIM* going to NO going to do? It's just another damn photo op!

[ramapo]

6. I'm voting no

Bush "on the ground" is nothing but a photo-op. I'd rather have a president back in Washington in charge and banging heads to make things happen.

[202 456]

7. It'll be 50/50 soon

So a Soul-less CNN reporter can say "There is a big division in our nation... blah blah blah blah blah"

[AValdoux]

8. What would it have mattered?

It's not like he wasn't capable of helping if only he was onsite. We heard all during his vacation that he was in touch & on the job, just in Crawford, the "western white house". This is another one of CNN's questions that ask more than it answers.


AValdoux

[me b zola]

9. Yes, 36% of Americans are nuts!

Should President Bush have been on the ground in New Orleans sooner?

Yes.................64%...76307 votes

No..................36%...42079 votes


Total: 118386 votes


George bush* doesn't care about Black or poor people!!!!!!

[lindisfarne]

10. The 36% isn't all Bush supporters. Bush being on the ground would

have just interfered with the effort because of all his security. Bush needed to be on top of things, competent, with competent people in the relevant positions. That would have helped. He could have done this from Baton Rouge, or Washington, for that matter. edit: I should have said "One could have done this ... " Bush, obviously, couldn't have.

All Bush did when he got there is set up fake photo shoots. And cause every helicopter to be grounded until he was out of the area. Not good for the people being rescued.

[Tesla]

11. 65%to 35% now!

I finally am a 1%er!!!

[brettdale]

12. exclude

"I tried to vote in this poll, I click on yes , but the word EXCLUDE came up, then the results appeared as usual, would my vote had of counted?"

http://cnn.com


Should President Bush have been on the ground in New Orleans sooner?

65% yes
35% No

[MojoXN]

13. 65% yes, 35% no

With about 21k votes.

"Are they nuts!!"

Yes. Yes they are.

As MojoXN always says, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

[Blue_In_AK]

14. He shouldn't necessarily have been on the "ground" sooner...

...but it would have been nice if he had been on the "job" (for ONCE in his pathetic life).

[bullimiami]

15. it has nothing to do with where he was. it was what he should have been

doing about it. instead of sleeping, strumming the guitar, sleeping some more and giving a speech about how he should be allowed to F-up social security and then going back to his ranchette for another nights warm, dry and comfy sleep - maybe he should have been making phone calls, asking questions, giving orders and thinking about the DISASTER.

juat like 9/11 when he was on vacation, then looking at a tv, reading with some kids and then flying off to bum fuck like a chickenshit. he should have been...once again. making phone calls, asking questions, giving orders and thinking about the damned HIJACKINGS.

He is the shittiest president EVER. EVER. Seriously. EVER!

[6000eliot]

16. Still 65%