Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should we eat crow? It appears Capitol Hill Blue was right all along

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:41 PM
Original message
Should we eat crow? It appears Capitol Hill Blue was right all along
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:21 PM by CatWoman
CHB kept ran several "inside the WH accounts" which we deemed as not credible.

Seems that guy knew what he was talking about.

My granddaughter throws less tantrums.

On edit: due to several requests, I did a google search. Came back with lots of hits. Most of those hits were posted on DU.

http://www.google.com/search?q=capitol+hill+blue%2Bgeorge+bush&sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Here's the link to the Time Mag article: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1103581,00.html

and the News Week article:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9287434/site/newsweek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. depends on who 'we' is
i never doubted his tantrums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. *sniff* *sniff*
is that Sniffa??

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Crow in oven right now
who was it that said no matter how bad things look, it's worse?
Something to that effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. my thoughts exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. heh
great minds, you know :D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
65. He exposed himself as a nutfucking case in the debates with Kerry...
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:44 PM by lonestarnot
and people still voted for the freak...so is this suppose to be new? And I'm not eat'n no crow as I have said it all along... he's a sideshow freak! "Fuck you bushitler, just go fuck yourself bushitler!" by some M.D. whose name I can't remember...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. Polls after the debates showed the majority of the viewers
thought Kerry won all three.

As much as the Exit Polls (or more so) I regard that as evidence of electoral fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #83
91. me tooooo... but what we gona do riot? A riot of two ain't much LOL
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 11:32 PM by lonestarnot
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #83
108. A challenger trouncing a SITTING PRESIDENT in all 3 DEBATES should've been
the biggest news for weeks at that time.

Geez, the media made a bigger deal about the Red Sox sweeping the Yankees than they did a Dem senator sweeping a SITTING PRESIDENT.

Instead, the media downplayed it as "Well, the debates aren't that important anymore." and "But, George Bush can't be beat on the terror issue." as they gave absolutely NO REASON why that was true while ignoring every fact that proved their statement was decidely UNTRUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Care to provide some examples of
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 09:46 PM by jim3775
What CHB exclusively wrote we know now to be true.

Edit: I really have no idea what the OP is referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. This one
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=33&num=5141

Bush Taking Anti-Depressants to Control Mood Swings
By CHB Staff
Jul 28, 2004, 06:13

President George W. Bush is taking anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behavior, depression and paranoia, Capitol Hill Blue has learned.

The prescription drugs, administered by Col. Richard J. Tubb, the White House physician, can impair the President’s mental faculties and decrease both his physical capabilities and his ability to respond to a crisis, administration aides admit privately.

<snip>
“Keep those motherfuckers away from me,” he screamed at an aide backstage. “If you can’t, I’ll find someone who can.”

Bush’s mental stability has become the topic of Washington whispers in recent months. Capitol Hill Blue first reported on June 4 about increasing concern among White House aides over the President’s wide mood swings and obscene outbursts.

more at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. So we know now that bush is taking drugs to...
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 09:52 PM by jim3775
control mood swings? Did I miss something? I didn't hear anythig about this. *shrug*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. there were several threads
but I'm sorry you didn't see them.

I ain't about to search thru all that stuff either.

You can, tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Why is it up to me
It is up to the OP'er to provide a link to support the post. Burden of proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I did just that
go back to my original post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. How does that prove anything?
You are just searching for capitol hill blue+george bush. There is nothing there to prove CHB is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. go back to my original post, read the articles
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:08 PM by CatWoman
the Time article is there as well.

I report; you decide.

NOTE: As I explained in my original post, those hits from the google search were posted here on DU.

Do I fucking work for you or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I always believed THAT one
seemed perfectly in line with his public persona...I know he likes think he comes off as "folksy", but I always saw a guy who seemed right on the edge of extreme anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
52. If I had been raised by the likes
of Babs Bush, I'd be on the edge of extreme anger, also. And here's what really infuriates me, as someone who's struggled with depression and anxiety all her life (didn't know it until my late 20's, though, when it was finally diagnosed and I got some medicine). The wingers have always made a big deal out of anti-psychotic medicines like anti-depressants, etc., saying they really aren't needed, people just need to "buck up" and "take personal responsibility", etc., etc., blahblahblahblahyaddayaddayadda. That's like telling a diabetic to "buck up" and get along without his insulin, or something like that.

And they've always smeared and attacked anyone running for office who they find takes such medicines, or the family members of anyone running for office who may take such medicines. Remember Colin Powell's wife, who was on anti-depressants? A major reason he didn't run for president was because he didn't want her dragged through the mud the way he knew the wingnut GOP fuckers would do.

So, it's not the fact that Bush is taking these medicines (he very obviously needs them), it's the whole HYPOCRISY of it that infuriates me. The usual selfish creed from the Bushes and the GOP, it's okay for them, because they always have a good reason, but it's not okay for anyone else because other people never have a good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
68. Right on, liberalhistorian!
I have used exactly the same example, telling an diabetic to "buck up". Many mental health problems are due to chemical imbalances in the brain, and the medicine helps correct them so you can function well. Like you, I suffer anxiety and depression, and was not diagnosed until my 30's. Thank God for the medication. And if anyone wants to tell me to "buck up" and go without it (that includes you, Tom Cruise), well they can go to hell. And you know what? If * needs medication, I am the last person to make negative comments about that. I just hate the hypocracy of these people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #52
98. Yeah, what liberalhistorian said.
I have to take anti-anxiety and anti-depressant medications. If * would say, "Look, I realize I have a problem" and come clean, resign, step down, I might even be able to feel sorry for him while he spends the rest of his life at the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
57. A few weeks ago I had used the CHB article in a reply post,
and I was slammed unmercifully. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Tertiary Syphilis?..Organic Brain Dysfunction due to Alc/Drug abuse?..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarojin Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Being born to his parents
and then killing hundreds of thousands of people for greed and power, how could he not be insane? How can there even be any question about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
92. No question here. He is a mass murderer. NOLA by negligent homicide,
and the Iraq and Afghani Wars by intentional homicide. He is indeed insane. (Or I am.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
132. Nothing about anti-depressants in the Time or Newsweek articles...
...that I could find. What's been confirmed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I'm waiting with bated breath too!.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. go back to my original post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
93. Thanks! I had posted too soon. I caught it!.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. hey, we always knew it was true
we still can't prove it.

The Time story is not enough. We need more NON anonymous people coming forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hardrainfallin Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. what I'd like to see are UAs n/t
piss test Bush. Now. pee in the cup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. is there a new Time article
we might want to read?

..trying to figure out what you all are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. thanks!
off to read this,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. I don't get it
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:18 PM by marbuc
this article says nothing about any tantrums on the proportion of those cited in Capitol Blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. you think it's normal that your staff is terrified to tell you that your
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:21 PM by CatWoman
vacation has to end because a major seaport has flooded?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9287434/site/newsweek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #51
116. and you are
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and being available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year is YOUR JOB??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #116
117. Jawja!!!!!!
hey girl!!!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #117
127. CAT!!
Hey!! Good to see you!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Occasionally, even the National Enquirer prints the truth.
I still don't believe in the Bat Boy, though.

Personally, I don't remember anyone saying that the story wasn't credible, just the source. We were all waiting for confirmation from a more reliable source.

Looks like we got it!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
61. Bat-Boy = World Weekly News. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #61
84. Frankly, I wouldn't be too proud about knowing the difference...
:evilgrin: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #84
110. Thanks for the insult -
Have you never been in a supermarket? You couldn't miss it. Besides that - I did a search, because I knew it was not the Inquirer. I did a google on "bat boy." Try it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RallyInDC Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. a three year old throws less tantrums. BUSH is a whiny brat!!!!!
lets KICK HIS ASS OUT

its time HIS BOSS, CALLED AMERICA FIRES HIM

get on the bandwagon it ain't stopping...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. is bush a raging maniac? yes
bubble boy to the extreme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. I got a busted watch that's right twice a day
Want to apologize to it?

CHB is unreliable garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. and "na na na, boo boo" to you, too!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. I tend to agree - my wife calls CHB "liberal porn"
All CHB has to do is provide me with an authenticated MP3 recording of Bush in one of his alleged tirades, and I'll back off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
94. "progressive porn" has alliteration. Or "porn for progressives." nt
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 11:35 PM by Eric J in MN
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
130. That's funny
I read the OP, posted my pithy reply and then went down the list to see what the venerable Will Pitt had to say since we so often have the same opinion on things. I avoid reading your stuff first, though, because I want to make sure I'm not being your parrot. I don't care to be anyone's parrot.

Anyway, the funny thing is, I posted that a broken clock is right twice a day..........

This amuses me.

It brings me back to the first time I saw you speak and I leaned over to my boyfriend and said, I think I've found the twin I was separated from at birth. He agreed since he'd been listening to my rants for so long and they were so similar to yours.

While this is funny, I'm grateful for the times we don't agree because after a while, it gets creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. What are you refering to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. I always knew CHB was right
when they reported on him pitching fits - no proof - but that would be completely consistent with his bully - frat boy attitude - I always knew there were no WMDs for first because I know the man is a freaking liar and then much later I heard Scott Ritter who claimed they weren't there - he just confirmed what I believed.

So even if I can't prove that * swears and screams and is a nasty ass - I know it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
87. Bush is intolerant both
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 11:12 PM by Eric J in MN
in a personal way and philosophically.

But I still don't believe the specific quotes in "Capitol Hill Blue."

They have too much of a telling-progressives-what-we-want-to-hear quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. I'm not sure I believe
their exact quotes - but I sure do believe he pitches fits - and their quotes are probably not too far off - just looking at the way he walks and smirks you can tell if he doesn't get his way he is probably very nasty and then there is his mother who apparently is quite the charmer herself (remember she called Geraldine Ferraro a bitch) and everyone says he takes after her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, I thought about that too
Now that the Newsweek article is out ("How Bush Blew It"), it looks like Capitol Hill Blue was right all along.

CHB always "passed the smell test" as far as I was concerned. Bush looked weak and snippy and unstable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. What stories were they running?
and how do we know he was right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. I still don't think that specific story was/is true. Not even the...
latest accounts back up what's in the CHB article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. I thinkk it's true, but I think the story is just a good guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. It's a "good guess" at best... it's too bad the author didn't present...
it as such. And this wasn't the first time the author's veracity has been questioned.

Note that I would love to believe the article. But without substantiation and due to this author's track record, I just can't go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. I haven't seen the story yet
Linky pretty please, especially if it's even worse than what CHB had to say. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
60. Thanks, interesting
I've read the CHB articles, didn't doubt Georgie was a bully, just doubted anybody was actually talking about it. Guess they were. Time article is interesting, how can people cover up for a president who is so obviously incompetent. I'll never get that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. also note the News Week article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #66
80. Just read that
CatWoman... MY HAIR'S ON FIRE!!!

I always knew he didn't care and I always knew he was an ass and I always knew he was incompetent.. but to see it right there in black and white... madre mia :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. I mean, people were dying and his staff was afraid to tell him
that he had to cut his vacation short?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. Let's put it in a movie
he can watch it and we'll stand in the other room..

And the part about liking numbers? I wondered what the hell all those numbers were about last week, now all I can think of is Vietnam and body counts. No wonder Bush doesn't know what the hell is going on anywhere in the world.

And their solution is to just flippantly throw money at the Gulf? I knew they never cared about spending money, it's controlling WHO gets the money they care about. And he's going to run on tax reform next year??? :crazy:

This is some scary shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think Kentucky Fried Chicken is now serving crow
That's why it tastes so horribly greasy and I have nightmares after eatting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is there proof that they are, indeed, correct?
Or is your own speculation, serving as proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. go back to my original post, read the articles
I report; you decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. LOL ... I always figured you were a "Fox"
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. LOLOLOLOL
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. we is who? I believed them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. TBR news is a web spin-off of...
the barnes report. The barnes report is a nazi revisionist history "journal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Sorry, I missed any newsflash that validated CHB's scoops -- what
are you specifically referring to? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Here's a thread from LBN 320 posts I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #37
107. Sorry, didn't see anything in there about * speaking in tongues or having
seizures. Yelling at someone in a meeting probably happens with every president. Maybe even every meeting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
54. No crow here. Let's break it down.
Since the time article is supposedly proof that CHB's inside source was credible, I am going to break it down and prove no crow is needed.

Firstly, CHB did not exclusively report "from inside sources" that bush lives in a media bubble. This has been mentioned sevral times in much more credible sources, printing something you already know to be true and claiming it is from an "inside source" is sloppy journalism (and imo proves that CHB is highly suspect).

Here are two articles to prove this:

Asia Times:The Bush in the bubble May 14, 2005

and

The Monarch
February 24, 2005


Now the key assertion in the CHB article link is that bush is taking medication to control mood swings. Nowhere does the time article say any such thing

Another "fact" from this supposedly true CHB article:

"The prescription drugs, administered by Col. Richard J. Tubb, the White House physician, can impair the President’s mental faculties and decrease both his physical capabilities and his ability to respond to a crisis, administration aides admit privately."

Okay so let me get this straight, rank incompetence and cronyism, coupled with a de-funding of important branches of government isn't the reason bush fucked up on katrina, it was his crazy mood swings?! Again nowhere does the time article say any such thing.

There is no crow needed here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. oh, get off your high fucking horse
Time wasn't the only article that let us know Bush is a bullying, foul-tempered loon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Stop peddling bullshit
The time article does not say bush is "a bullying, foul-tempered loon".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. *sigh*
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:37 PM by CatWoman

Make a deal with you -- I'll stop peddling bullshit, when you stop acting like you run the place.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. I read the article
I can't find anything to support that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #58
99. You should take your own advise.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 12:44 AM by TankLV
WE highly recommend it!

Especially from someone so afraid of himself that he disables his profile.

But we know to take your spew with a grain of salt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
56. Hmmm... well the title of the TIME article...
is enough to send me back to my original conclusion, that the president is getting more and more isolated ( The Bubble Boy) which is exactly what happened to Nixon. I believe Bush will out-Nixon Nixon with erratic behaviour. Both men do NOT like to lose, and want to have the appearance of being 'loved by the masses' even though they loathe the masses.

I think Bush will self-destruct, and while that may not prompt his resignation (well, *sigh* we can dream can't we?) I can hope it at least will do enough damage to his party and the current 'regime minds-set'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
62. What does that Google search prove? Not much. just sites linking back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. again
I said that the articles in google link had been posted here on DU.

People kept asking which CHB stories were posted on DU.

Rather than search CHB's archives, I did a google search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brightmore Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
67. How does the Time & Newsweek articles
prove that CHB was right about Bush being mentally insane?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. they prove that someone hasn't been paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. Sorry, as much as I love to criticize GWB
I don't see anything in either article showing anything more than a short temper. No mood altering drugs, no irrational rantings, nothing. Clinton was also known to have a temper, yet certainly was/is not insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
69. I read he threw an absolute fit when someone took "his" seats
at a Ranger's game. And I apologize as I don't have the source right here with me, but I think it was either in "Fortunate Son" or "Shrub". I've lent both books to my daughter so....

Okay, I'll shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
71. Read "Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President "
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 10:55 PM by Sapphire Blue
... by Justin A. Frank, M.D., a clinical professor in the Department of Psychiatry at George Washington University Medical Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
72. Connecting the dots
It's just a matter of time before the dots are all connected and Cat Woman can have a nice roasted crow BBQ for all you doubters to eat...

Recall 30-something years ago, Nixon was acting irrationally before his attempted impeachment and eventual resignation....Since it was pre-Internet, it wasn't in the WaPo at the time, but it was the talk of the town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #72
124. Big difference, though, is Nixon really WAS president. Not so here.
Hard to figure what's going on here. SOMETHING is, though. That's for sure. I tend to think it has to do with Treasongate. Bush clearly got stranded, and was hanging out there in the media, without his usual support system, for 4 to 5 days. Now, the spin machine is back in gear. Was Rove negotiating his Treasongate pardon? That's my guess.

And maybe more than that. Some kind of threatened coup going on, re Cheney. Maybe why Daddy Bush and Clinton came out and stood behind Jr. Cheney threatening to rat on Jr. in Treasongate--and they appeased him with Halliburton contract, and strongarming of Blanco to turn LA over to him. (--didn't quite work, but enough $$ to be made to quiet Darth).

Dunno. I sure had the feeling the White House was in disarray.

-----

Here's an idea. And I think it's really cool. How about we find a way to restore our right to vote, and vote this criminal gang out of office?

Neat?

'Stead of letting THEIR cronies "count" the votes with SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code?

Any takers? Any Democratic leaders out there who think this might be a good idea?

Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
73. I'd love to see a "Nixon-Ziegler" moment
There was a notorious video clip in which Nixon was seen getting irritated at his press secretary Ron Ziegler, turning around, and angrily pushing him out of the way with both hands.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
74. I retract nothing.
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 11:05 PM by Eric J in MN
Like most DUers, I know Bush has a bad personality.

That doesn't mean that Bush said all the things "Capitol Hill Blue" claims he did.

For example, one of the CHB articles claims that Bush chewed out a staffer over Veterans of Foreign Wars wearing these bullshit protectors:



That seems to me more like a way to pad an article and tell progressives what they want to hear, then something which actually happened. I doubt Bush noticed the Bullshit protectors.

More on them at:
http://www.speakspeak.org/speak-blog/index.php?p=1061
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. Eric
you're the most polite, reasonable dissenter I've faced.

Thanks for that :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. You're welcome. (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Thanks for the backhanded slap
I really appreciate being insulted. /sarcasm

Way to keep the discussion elevated and mature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #81
100. You deserve it - big time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #100
123. self delete
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 02:34 PM by jim3775
converting post into PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
76. Links please?
S'okay, I seen 'em...I just wanted to really piss you off.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. HAHAHAHAHAHA
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
82. Oh...damn.
I thought you were talking about the one that stated that Fitzgerald's indictments were coming down for pretty much the entire adminstration, from the Chicago grand jury (as opposed to the DC one).

Drat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. That was Tom Flocco not CHB
Tom Flocco also said that the Clinton's and the Bush's worked together to asassinate JFK jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
89. EEK -
Recommended. God what a LOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNGGGGG mutha f-n three years this is gonna be. :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. I will try this in this thread since lots are now paying attention
Tardive Dyskinesia:

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The term "tardive" or late dyskinesia was introduced in 1964 and refers to an iatrogenic disease associated with neuroleptic drug use (American College of Neuropsychopharmacology FDA Task Force 1973, Fann and Lake 1976).

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a syndrome of hyperkinetic involuntary movements characterized by a mix of orofacial dyskinesia, tics, chorea and/or athetosis (American College of Neuropsychopharmacology FDA Task Force, 1973). Orofacial dyskinesia is the most characteristic feature of TD. It is slow in onset, which may begin as mild tongue movements, followed by exaggerated movements of the tongue and lips. Bulging of the cheeks, chewing movements, blinking, blepharospasm, grimacing, and arching of the eyebrows also occur. Movements of the extremities and trunk are also noted in some patients. These include choreoathetoid-like movements of the fingers, hands, arms, and feet. Truncal involvement may produce rocking and swaying and rotational pelvic movements.

Usually TD appears while patients are taking neuroleptics, although movements often appear for the first time or increase following a dose reduction or discontinuation of the drug.

Movements in TD may worsen with emotional stress, volitional motor activity, and attempts to inhibit portions of the dyskinesia. On the other hand, movements decrease with sedation and disappear during sleep. Patients should be evaluated at least several hours after awakening and about the same time each day since movements tend to be worse in the afternoon and least severe just after the patient has awoken in the morning (Hyde et al 1995).

http://www.vh.org/adult/provider/psychiatry/CPS/08.html

======

DOes this remind you of anybody we know???? hmmmmmm?/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
96. Step back a few steps. .... Now you have to wonder why after 5 years
we suddenly hear gossip from inside the WH.

Why?

So Bush can take the blame for all the neocon & RW crap. For all the diminishing of governance.

So that their dream can continue unabated.

They always need a scapegoat - looks like Bush whose done nothing but parrot what he is told - is now going to get all the anger at all the failures dumped on him.

Cause they can get rid of him in the next election.

And keep their jungle juice flowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #96
101. No way- the base wont buy it. Congressmen need coat tails.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #101
105. Actually - I just read somewhere that these stories have gone around
to journalists for ages. Journalists have just decided to talk about them now. I guess the anger & outrage finally was too much to give the Pres a "walk in the park".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #105
112. The GOP base LOVES GW. They will not squeeze him out.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
97. No different than those who support him
We need to replace the concept of "rednecks" with people who are congitively and emotionally dysfunctional. It's not a Southern thing. Wealth and power expose individuals to a self serving version of reality that isn't reality at all - just a way to perpetuate control and power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
102. Bush is an asshole, we already knew that. But I do think something else is
going on with him. Remember the videos of his performances in debate years ago, before he was pres, contrasted with his later performances in public speaking? Obvious deterioration.

Whether it's the condition Ouabache has suggested in a post here or something else, I don't know. I'm not Dr. Frist who can miraculously diagnose at a distance. He may or may not be medicated up the whazoo and what the hell was that box on his back he appeared to be wearing, even on the ranch?

I read Cap Hill Blues and TBR news for entertainment purposes. They take bits of stuff already known and then add to it. But sensationalistically and of course without a way to confirm any of the most interesting bits. Time mag does not confirm the most "interesting" claims of either. It tells us what we could already figure out for ourselves, based on corporate media reports, his performance and conduct in public. It doesn't tell us he's on psychotropic drugs or goes on bizarre rampages.

I've worked for a couple of narcissistic solopsistic assholes who could make you regret telling them what they needed to hear when they didn't want to hear it. They didn't go on rampages. They didn't have to. They had power over their employees and used it in a relatively low key but effective manner.

I'm also wondering who provided the "insider" details to Time and why? Perhaps except for the former employees, the currently employed administration sources clearly were trying to spin the story positively, the idea of Bush in charge, angry and wanting results and moving forward. The Time piece isn't much of a revelation IMO and doesn't really confirm the controversial gossip promulgated by CHB and others.

The facts we do know and can see for ourselves is disturbing enough. No sensationalistic gossip is needed to know that this guy and his gang should not be in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
103. I''' serve you some kemosabe
I never doubted them... his behaviour has been telling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
104. Thank you, Cat Woman.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #104
109. hey you!!!
:hi:

and thank you

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
106. Nope
I could have written that. You could have written that. Neither of us would claim it was an "insider's scoop", though. Thompson's got a crap record when it comes to scoops, ie, he makes shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
111. After reading the Time article I think I'll go
:puke:

They tried hard not to be so hard but the guy is a walking disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
113. I don't see how these articles support CHB?
If anything it would seem CHB takes articles like the above and embellishes them with details the writers "know" to be true.

Kind of like Wayne Madsen without the conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagiana Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
114. SELF DELETE
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 01:49 PM by chicagiana
SELF DELETE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
115. The only one eating crow...
Is Lance Armstrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
118. I'm stir frying my crow...
CHB not such crackpots after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
119. I always thought they were likely true
but I was always, like, "Who's your source, dude?" :)

But seriously, it's not us who should be eating crowe, it's all those freeps who still think Bush is a guy they'd like to have a beer with. Reality is, Bush is someone most of them would walk away from in a bar muttering, "Asshole!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #119
121. Hey Sweetums
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 02:22 PM by CatWoman
:hi:

I never did get that "beer" thing. :shrug:

I drink with either people I like and can relate to, or who's pants I'm trying to get into :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #121
126. LOL, slut!
And you a grandma! :spray: :hi: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
120. Don't pass the crow yet...
Granted, the Newsweek story IMPLIES that Capitolhillblue was right, but I still don't see any signs of the Pres being fed drugs and ranting out of control....

keep the crow handy but I'm not ready to accept everything capitolhillblue said about Bush*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. middle finger to the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
125. While I don't doubt Dubya
is a mean, childish man in private, I do now doubt the reliability of Capitol Hill Blue.

I'm sorry I ever cited them as a source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
128. Even a broken clock is right twice a day
It doesn't make that source a reliable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #128
129. OH, go back to bed!!!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #129
131. I slept for 10 hours woman!
I'm up and I'm feisty! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC