DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-13-05 11:37 AM
Original message |
Bush To Take Responsibilitiy For Katrina Response Blunders |
|
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pri&dt=050913&cat=news&st=newsd8cjfldgb&src=apHow will his enablers who were blaming everything on Governor Blanco and Mayor Nagin respond? Will the spin win?
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-13-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
1. When? did he say when? |
LibertyorDeath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-13-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
2. "Bush To Take Responsibility For Katrina Response Blunders" |
|
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
You mean Rove told him to shut the fuck up and repeat after me
George George are you listening ....focus focus for fucksakes when I talk into your fucking ear piece you repeat it verbatim.. got it... good now watch this drive.
"Bush To Take Responsibility" He doesn't have the first fucking clue about Responsibility just ask anyone that knows the spoiled petulant fucker.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-13-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
LibertyorDeath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-13-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I read the thread title and went temporarily insane. :)
Responsibility & bush do not equate...ever...
|
OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-13-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
5. NO NO NO . . . he is NOT taking responsibility . . . |
|
"to the extent that the federal government didn't fully do it's job right, I take responsibility," . . .
and a month from now, his "thorough" investigation will conclude that, gee gosh golly, there WAS no extent that the federal government didn't do it's job right . . .
qualifying "taking responsibility" with "to the extent that" negates whatever responsibility he claims to be taking . . . just another BushCo lie/pr stunt . . .
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |