Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't Ulysses Grant leave office in shame due to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 09:56 AM
Original message
Didn't Ulysses Grant leave office in shame due to
corruption, cronyism and nepotism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, but he stil served his whole term...
and in U.S. Grant's defense, he just spent his whole term in office drinking whiskey and smoking cigars, while everybody else sunk into corruption and cronyism.

Sort of like Bush, only replace "drinking whiskey" and "smoking cigars" with "choking on pretzels" and "falling off bikes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Grant served out his term. Bush will too, sadly.
Grant was taken advantage of by his friends who were a bunch of crooks. He personally died poor. Somehow I doubt Shrub is going to end up destitute. He'll spend the rest of his misreble life being protected by taxpayer paid Secret Service from the people he harmed.

Also, unlike Bush, Grant knew how to run a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. good point, BCG
Also, unlike Bush, Grant knew how to run a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Partially true
His memoirs were completed just before his death, and although poor when he died, the sales of the memoirs were so huge, it gave his widow and family financial security for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Grant was taken advantage of by robber barons.
Of course, Grant can be condemned for not being more savvy, but it seems Grant was not personally corrupt or involved in any of the graft.

Grant remained pretty popular despite the scandals. He did not have much money as a former President and stayed alive out of sheer willpower to finish his memoirs, which would create an inheritance for his family. On the day Grant finished his memoirs, he died.

The so-called "Powell Doctrine" is a bullshit hijacking, as known by all military historians. The US military doctrine of overwhelming force has been known as Grantian military strategy since the Civil War. Powell never came up with any new doctrines, but the republicans started using the incoerrect term "Powell Doctrine" to make him look like a great general. Powell is a colossal fuck up who refused to send an armored force to Somalia. The result was the Rangers getting ambushed with no armor to come to assist. Of course, after that happened, an armored brigade was right on the way from Fort Stewart.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. He wrote his Autobiography and it sold so well...
His wife and hiers were set for life....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whatver Grant Did As President He Gets A Pass For Winning The Civil War..
Edited on Wed Sep-14-05 10:05 AM by DemocratSinceBirth



I hope you're not comparing a Bush* to Ulysses Grant...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. no, not the man
Edited on Wed Sep-14-05 10:06 AM by CatWoman
but the corruption - the military industrial complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. He served two full terms.
Edited on Wed Sep-14-05 10:13 AM by Bridget Burke
Most say he was personally honest, but was unsuccessful in combating the corruption of others. He was a bit too trusting--& was new to politics.

He did NOT stop Reconstruction, but continued to oppose the Klan & pursue rights for blacks. So some Southerners fostered the legend that his presidency was 100% corrupt.

As a General, he helped save the Union. After he left the Presidency, he lost money in a bad investment. To support his family, he wrote his memoirs--while dying of cancer. Many consider the memoirs to be quite excellent.

Some of this info is from memory. Then, there's the usual source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulysses_S._Grant

There was more to his Presidency than corruption. And there was more to the man than the Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. this thread isn't supposed to be a slam against Grant
but rather a slam against corruption and croynism in the presidency.

I watched this move, "Son of the Morning Star" - biopic about Custer.

Custer testified before Congress about the corruption he witnessed in the Bureau of Indian Affairs. And he named Grant's brother as one of the benefactors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Custer Wanted To Be President...
He thought he would burnish his reputation as an Indian fighter and ride that reputation to the White House...


Haha...

Sadly that was the Native American's last big victory which provoked the government to respond with grossly disproportionate force...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Custer was a fucking loser
hot headed asshole, completely unrealistic in his vision when it came to dealing with Native Americans.

But that doesn't mean he was lying about Grant's brother, or the corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Custer graduated last at West Point!
Yet had such blind ambition... he almost succeeded... but was crushed by his own ego and stupidity.

It is true he may have been truthful about Grant's brother. But as I hinted below, Grant is no more responsible for his brother's behavior than Bill Clinton was for Roger, or Jimmy Carter was for Billy. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Custer Equals Bush Without The Battlefield Courage...
I just hope there isn't a Little Big Horn in his and our future.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Little Big Horn is now
We're swimming in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Custer was a dumbass
But besides that, I would see Grant's brother like I see Clinton's - an embarrassing goof, and an example of how trusting Grant was.

Custer testifying about corruption in the BIA is like David Duke testifying about corruption in the Civil Rights Department. Objects in the mirror may be larger than they appear! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. He served two full terms
He was embarrassed, yes. He himself was an honest man of integrity and virtue, but he had one of the most corrupt cabinets in history. The fact was, he was in over his head - and had NO CONTROL over what they were pulling behind his back. He was too trusting and naive, and had NO political acumen.

He was a failure in civilian life before the Civil War. He served in the Mexican War and was privately opposed to it - it divided the nation the way Vietnam and Iraq have divided us in our time. He resigned from the Army in the 1850's, and worked as general store clerk - and that even failed.

He re-enlisted and made military history. But again, as president, he was a glaring failure the way he was in pre-war life. He simply had no aptitude for politics or administration.

I highly recommend his memoirs. They were edited by Mark Twain, and are still considered the best memoirs of any ex-president. He understandably doesn't dwell on too much on his presidency. But you come away with a sense that he was a well-meaning man in over his head as president. No similarity to Harding, Nixon, Reagan, or Bush II - he had more virtue than all of them combined and then some. His administration, unfortunately, ranks right up there with theirs for its levels of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Zomby Big Brother to the rescue
:hi:

Thanks for the info :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. You're welcome!
And thanks to Bridgit for filling in some gaps. Grant DID feel pressure to end Reconstruction and civil rights advances, but stood firm. Unfortunately, the 1876 election (as Grant was ending his second term) between Hayes and Tilden was like 2000 - with Tilden winning the popular vote but not the electoral. Guess where the disputed votes occurred? West Palm Beach County Florida! :crazy:

And so a deal was cut - the southern Democrats said they would give Florida's electoral votes to Republican Rutherford B. Hayes in exchange for Hayes ending Reconstruction, and therefore ending the northern presence in the south to aid African-Americans in securing their rights.

As a side note here, Hayes's great-great grandson is a retired attorney in Seattle named Rutherford P. Hayes. He wrote a letter to the Seattle P-I newspaper in 2000 endorsing Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yep... The Republicans Sold Out The Freedman
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC