napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 10:47 PM
Original message |
Richard Clarke on Nightline! n/t |
Maru Kitteh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm glad he's there - I trust him |
|
even when I don't want to hear what he says. I have great respect for that guy after reading his book.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
2. There are two guests. Richard Clarke and Jerry H something.. |
|
Saing that it has always been the assumption that the Fed response should immediately take control is there is a calamity or majoir disaster. They didn't do that this time!
Richard said that was always the assumption during all the 3 presidents he worked for.
|
cornfedyank
(642 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. the guy who wrote the "anonymous book" is not a fan |
|
it is so difficult deciding who is telling the truth.
|
Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. yep...he HATES Clarke...I saw an interview with Scheuer, the CIA |
|
guy about whom you speak
he blames Clarke, I think, for getting him shunted off to the side for being "obsessed" with binLaden
that's how the interviewer put it, and Scheuer was miffed that he put it that way:
"Some people might call it doing your job"
powerful stuff
but, also, Scheuer thinks that William Colby was the last decent CIA chief we've had. !!!!!!!
so let's keep things in perspective
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I agree with Clarke though, when he said the Feds have to assume |
|
total control when a calamity occurs because the local Gov't simply can't handle it!
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Exactly. It's like blaming the victim. |
Maru Kitteh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I thought he was exhonerating the victims, i.e. the St. and local |
|
officials that the pubs and admin have been so quick to lay the blame on.
Clarke said they (troops) could evacuate and assist and SHOULD HAVE without running law enforcement. I agree with him.
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I thought that's what I said. Oops. |
Maru Kitteh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. He was very careful to explain they did not have to violate Posse |
|
Comitatus, in other words, not law enforcement, assistance, organization and evacuation ONLLY. I thought he did well and brought up an important and overlooked point.
|
Demoiselle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-15-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Absolutely right, Veganistan! |
|
...And the Bushies are working the spin to get MORE power...Senator Vinter or Vintner or whatever the hell he is, Repuke for Louisiana, was talking about how wonderful it was when "the military" came in...hinting broadly that Governor Blanco was responsible for the delay. Um...since she never did "sign over authority" to Bush....and the 82nd Airborne came in anyway...why the hell couldn't they hav gotten there 3 days sooner? Just asking. I love Richard Clarke.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |