LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 02:11 PM
Original message |
Wandered over to Rosie O'Donnell's site |
|
She's waxing poetic:
the white house brought in lights to darkened new orleans for the 2 little 2 late tour that began with a heart felt fly over
the comments go when the noise numbs speak ur soul is the only rule
i do not trust george bush he is not qualified to lead us the man can hardly read a tele-prompter no accountability as usual
so unbearable so pathetic so sad
Love that first verse.
|
TallahasseeGrannie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Like the sentiments; not sure about the quality of the verse.
|
AndreaCG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. She was (metaphorically) sucking Bush's cock a couple |
|
of years ago, wonder what happened to make her switch back.
|
cybildisobedience
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I hate to always go back to that sort of thing when someone joins in the Bush-bashing, but I think about Rosie O'Donnell swooning over him in the post-9-11 period of insanity, and of people like Maureen Dowd writing snarky columns about ridiculous trivial matters, like Gore wearing earth tones during the 2000 election. I mean, in light of what's happened in the past few weeks, do they really think that Gore slightly altering his wardrobe was more troubling that installing in office a man who is clearly out of his depth and is dangerously delusional? I think I'd actually like to hear just one of these celebrities or media personalities say something their infantile behavior instead of merely pretending it never happened.
|
TallahasseeGrannie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-16-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
metaphorically or not... ewwwwww
I think maybe he "lost" Rosie when he was against gay marriage? Just a guess.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |