Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When is it time to call what is going on in Iraq a “civil war”?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:01 PM
Original message
When is it time to call what is going on in Iraq a “civil war”?
A ) When a bunch of provinces band together to secede from the union.
B ) When each side picks its own song.
C ) When Rumsfeld says, “Is it a civil war? No.”
D ) When the daily carnage reaches such a horrendous level that it no longer merits front page coverage.
E ) Now.


BUSH POLL NUMBERS PLUNGE FOLLOWING KATRINA DISASTER
Americans losing faith in his ability to protect them.


Top Magazines to Read In the Oval Office Waiting Room
1. Incompetence Today
2. Callous Disregard Monthly
3. Unscientific American
4. Modern Interrogation
5. Greed, Stupidity & Discrimination Review
6. Conquest Magazine
7. Religious Intolerance Digest
8. Mountaintop Removal Quarterly
9. Avarice Weekly
10. Contemporary Conspicuous Consumption
http://www.ironictimes.com/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe 6 months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't you get the Talking Points? The Civil War starts AFTER We Leave
until then it is INSURGENCY.

We have to fight the Insurgency there
so they do not have to fight the Civil War here.

WE can't sell it if we can't keep on message. In case you did not notice this is filled with :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostinacause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It really isn't a civil war if America is the one who instigated the war
and has been participating in it the whole time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. well it is a civil war and has been for quite a long time
The shiite faction is using our army as their proxy in the three way civil war between the major ethnic divisions of shiite, sunni, and kurd. Very smart of the shiites: they have all the big guns. Very stupid of us: we are establishing Greate Shiistan, or Greater Persia, or whatever you want to call it, we have played right into the hands of the Iranians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostinacause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Division does not necessarily mean that the war is a civil war.
I have already characterized why the war is not a civil war. We could also look to the insurgency in France when Hitler invaded and see divisions between the people; namely on what to do given the circumstances. This too would not be a civil war, but rather an insurgency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The divisions in France were not regional and ethnic.
Although yes, to a certain extent, the Resistance was fighting a civil war against the Vicy regime and its supporters as well as against the german occupying forces. The difference in Iraq is that the three-way division that pre-existed our stupid invasion was inevitably going to blow up into regional ethnic conflict. France had long ago settled its major regional conflicts (by murdering all of the protestants), so that fuel of civil war did not exist. What remains to be seen is how widespread the regional conflict will become. My guess is that it will in fact become very widespread, encompassing Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. We've lit the fuse. Brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. When the Sadr militia
is called to mobilize and attacks the Sunni Triangle. Then you'll see a Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. when we're certain that the whole gamut of violence on both sides
is not being perpetrated by mercenaries and special forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC