Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why didn't the Bush White House plant WMD in Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:18 PM
Original message
Poll question: Why didn't the Bush White House plant WMD in Iraq?
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 02:20 PM by Ian_rd
I know we're all still wrapped up in Katrina and Roberts, but this issue continues to bug me - probably because I still expect WMD to show up one day on the news and create the biggest "I told you so" in the history of the world. What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's still time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
67. that's right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want to vote for 2-5
Since I can't I won't have an official vote. Heavy sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. The rest of the world expected them to try it
and was watching too closely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. They got what they wanted in regards to going into Iraq.
Then, for months, they used the threat as further impetus to move their plan forward. We were/are so entrenched, it probably doesn't matter to them anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pat Robertson's Operation Blessing aircraft was too busy ...
... hauling heavy equipment for gold mining.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:20 PM
Original message
They don't need to. There are still people here in the US who believe
that WMD were there, that Bush was telling the truth, and that we are just days away from finding them.

And its not like anyone discusses all the lies.

Cindy raised a good point when asking Bush for the "Noble Cause".

I wish more people would discuss this.

"Well, no WMD. So why did we go in, and why are we still there?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who said they have integrity?
What's up with that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Freeps are forced to flee their comfort zone because of the "Roberts
is gay" talk over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Roberts is Gay??
Actually, I've seen that story - kinda funny. Funny thing is, the majority of successful gays that I know are Republican. I can't figure it out but I have been rather surprised by this seeming anomoly. It may have something to do with preserving what you have when you feel like you've "earned" it. It's a selfishness that plagues the Republican philosophy. In fact, their entire philopophy (repuke) could simply be described as "me, myself and I".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
69. But, successful in whose
terms?..I know a lot of successful Gays who are in the business of being Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
66. That's what I want to know..and
why are there 6 freeptards voting on this poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. IMHO and there was some chatter that they had
tried but got caught with the boxes and did not plant them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Judy Miller was about to, but had to go to jail before she could
deliver them.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. I remember there was a story floating around
that an attempt WAS made to plant the weapons. But through some kind of communication breakdown, the people planting them were mistaken for the enemy and killed.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I remember that one...
If it's the same story you're thinking of, it was the one covered by Iranian state news. I was waiting for a more credible news organization to confirm the story, but it never happened, so I pretty much decided that it wasn't worth believing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verdalaven Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Brownie must have been in charge of that mission.
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 02:29 PM by verdalaven
Yeah, I'm a bad girl.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Bad DU-er! BAD!!!
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 02:41 PM by rocknation
:spank:

On edit: Thanks for the story link, Tiptoe. It's from a Pakistani newspaper but quotes American military and Pentagon people.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
85. just an fyi: original date of story was 12/8/2003
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 02:17 PM by tiptoe
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/?page=story_12-8-2003_pg1_9

(The original link above had never worked for me during previous attempts months ago...now it does.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Here's the "whistleblower" story:
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 03:16 PM by tiptoe
US tried to plant WMDs, failed: whistleblower

If the report details are ever researched and confirmed -- and I don't know that they weren't debunked -- it would shine a brighter light on 1) Tenet's "Slam Dunk" comment, 2) Judith Miller's basis for confidence in her excursion to Iraq with MET Alpha unit to uncover WMDs, and 3) why WMDs never turned up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. They forgot n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think they tried
I vaguely remember some DU posts on a weapons cache found in another country during the early months of the invasion. Most speculated that these were destined to Iraq. I can't remember enough to do a search. Maybe someone else remembers what I'm referring to. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. It didn't matter to them...
we are there anyway.....hopefully we will bust the Bush liars someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Bushco had it covered.
The deal was to blame faulty Intell when no WMDs were found. That plan has worked for the most part. The other part is that they figured that most Amerikans wouldn't be outraged by the lack of WMDs because Saddam was ousted and Iraq was becoming a Democracy. Maybe Bushco underestimated the resistance of Iraqis to US/UK Colonialism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. What about
Bush wouldn't know a WMD if it bit him in the butt.

I believe the rumors that there were attempts made to plant 'evidence'. It sure as hell was planted beforehand, wasn't it.

Maybe someday we'll get the truth. Probably not today though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. They tried
a little reported story, the First ID killed to a man a CIA team, they claimed it was a Recon \ Intelligence unit that somehow got lost.

How do we know they tried? When was the last time they relieved a Lt General in teh middle of a succesful invasion?


So none of your options is good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. I expect WMD to show up, still
the way I expected it to show up three years ago--buried fucking deep in some desert hideaway in a form that it can't be used.

The reason why Bush didn't plant any is because what they needed to find is WMD, not WMD parts, not WMD traces, not buried bits and pieces. Now, I don't know about you, but if someone came to me and said, "I want you to take this nerve gas, put it in a container that looks Iraqi, scuff it up a bit, and smuggle it into Iraq...Oh, and by the way, you can't take any precautions like suits or special vehicles, because that would looks suspicious.....and bury it somewhere which is handy to Saddam but not so handy that somebody familiar with the area would know it wasn't there before. Don't forget to kill anyone who finds out. No, we won't kill you after, come on."

Now, my suspicion is that not too many would sign up on a dangerous mission to save Bush's bacon, and the WH knows that, and knows better than to even ask.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Don't forget!
They do claim to have found WMD PROGRAMS!

Programs. Compare that to the 'evidence' they were spouting pre-invasion.

Bring Them Home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Not even active programs; "programs" that could be restarted.
I'm not sure what a program is when it isn't doing anyting, nobody is working on it, and it's just a plan that may or may not be executed. I would call that a "not program".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. Well George Walker
is a pro with "not programs". Makes sense now. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. WMDs, then WMD programs, morphed into...
"programs of mass destruction-related activities," according to what * said in the 2004 State of the Union address.

oooh. Programs of mass destruction-related activities. Shiver me timbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #57
82. Like FDA labelling, the more words, the less like food
Pastueurized Processed Cheese Food. Whatever it is, it isn't cheese.

Same with Programs of Mass Destruction-Related Activities. Whatever it is, it isn't WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. I believe they tried twice -
One from the South just after the invasion, which was taken out by "friendly fire" (but a clandestine weapon-planting team would not ID itself to the point of qualifying as such).

One from the West which was intercepted by Jordanian military at the border.

Both accounts have been sucked into the media hole, and sorry if I can't provide links or corroboration, but it may take a whole generation or more for the truth of this illegal war to come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. see post #20 for link to story "from the South" I suspect. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zwielicht Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. They would have lost the last bit of international credibility
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 02:38 PM by zwielicht
Especially after Powell's shameful U.N.-presentation.

my 2 cents. A good question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Saddam was a WMD, remember?
Regardless, we simply moved our own WMD's into Iraq, and now we are the evil regime in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. The bungling boobs can't even button their own shirts.
The so called "intelligence community" in this country are hopeless cretins. And, the bloated, ineffective, military, is like the redcoats charging up Bunker Hill weighted down with equipment. If they can't push a button to make something happen they're stuck picking their noses.

Plant WMD? In thier dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
56. Yeah.
Busting into an Ira*qi jail with tanks to 'rescue' two undercover coalition agents is the way to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. Most WMD can be traced to a source.
Both nuclear and bio weapons usually have a fingerprint that shows where they came from. About all they could possibly get away with in chemical. But they would have to show more than a weapon or two, they would have to show how they were made, which would require much more than sneaking in a few barrels or warheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. The risk was too great
Now that they've already concluded that there were no WMD, it would be a hell of a thing for them to try and pull now. Nobody would believe it, I don't think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. "Other..."
This war was supposed to be over as quickly as it started. Finding WMDs was a part of that. I think they decided not to plant the "evidence" after realizing we would be in Iraq for a long time, for fear that, once found, Americans would say "pull out..." Seeing that this invasion wasn't going to be the cakewalk the Bushistas had envisioned, they very well couldn't have stayed in Iraq after the WMDs were "discovered," so they wouldn't be able to build the 14 military bases and seize control of the oil, the real reason we're there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Other!
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 03:07 PM by NCevilDUer
They wanted to, but for some unaticipated reason people over there started shooting at them and blew the whole operation.

On Edit:

Besides, if they foung the WMDs they wouldn't be able to say they were smuggled into Syria/Iran before the next phase of the seizure of the oil fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
32. Well, we got us four FRetards here
Either that or four sarcastic poll takers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Maybe they just like any option that says 'Zing!'
I was tempted myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. In my opinion, "zing" is underutilized. hehe. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. Because the believed the
"intelligence" they fabricated - too dumb to remember they made it up out of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Even as idiotic and credulous as so many Americans are, do you honestly
believe the country would "buy it" if some crates of WMD's just suddenly "turned up" now? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Don't ever underestimate the ability of Republicans to believe ANYTHING ..
.. Bush has an approval rating of 40%. That's not amazing for how low it is, but mind-blowing for how high it is. What on God's Earth has this chimp done RIGHT? And he has 40% because he says "God" all the time, wants to "save" marriage from the sodomous hordes, and thinks intelligent design should be taught in school.

People don't believe Bush because they listen carefully and weight the facts, they believe him in the same way that they believe the Bible. It's all faith. Unshakeable faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
63. That's what I was asking someone the other day.
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 07:24 PM by votesomemore
Exactly what has this man ever done Right? How can we be proud of this? Other than the swaggering on a Navy vessel and bringing a plastic turkey to the men and women fighting every day and night for his illegal and morally bankrupt war, he seems to have missed the mission accomplished. That would include an actual MISSION!
It may be accomplished today and not tomorrow, do not misunderstand! K?

What else, George. What have you done again? Oh. Lead us in prayer. Thank you very much. You can leave now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
37. Logistics
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 03:44 PM by lpbk2713


It would have taken too many people to pull of a scam that big. They just don't have that many people outside their inner circle that they can trust.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. WMDs are tracable
They'd be caught, and caught big time if they did it.

In fact, I figure they planned it that way all along, until they found out how easily they'd be caught at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. Yup, Scott Ritter was saying it would be near impossible
to get away with. Too easy to determine origin, too difficult logistically to pull off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. Yup, Scott Ritter was saying it would be near impossible
to get away with. Too easy to determine origin, too difficult logistically to pull off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
64. yabut
where did their WMDs (a loooong time ago) come from?

What did they do? Put a UPC code on them, "destined for Ira*q courtesy of the USofA"?
Could be.

If anyONE believes that SH gave a crap about producing his own weapons, they need to think again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #64
87. I could be talking out of my ass
but I believe it is fairly easy to determine *when* a bio weapon was produced. If I recall, one issue with Saddam's suppossed WMDs was that they would have degraded and been useless by now, at least the ones that Saint Ronnie and Poppy sold him.

So, we would have had to bring in some manufactured at the same time as the originals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imaginary girl Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. Too busy using them on innocent bystanders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
43. They dont care
They get voted in anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
44. Because they don't give a fuck. The important thing was getting in.
It doesn't matter that they got caught lying about it, they're in there now and aren't leaving until they've stolen all the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
45. Thinking back on it, they screwed up their own plans.
The CIA are the obvious ones to do that sort of thing, but when Plame was outed it pissed the CIA off and they stopped cooperating. They couldn't follow through until Goss replaced the former head and 'shook up' the organization, purging it of the disloyal. By that time it was too late to make it believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #45
71. They *can't* plan!
They are too busy not planning anything, except the cover-ups, to be able to forsee that an actual cache of WMDs might have helped.

Why do you think they haven't produced OBL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
48. Surprised that they didn't do it and claim that the Dems planted them....
Rove fell down on the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
49. It is too big of an operation to pull off
But I wouldn't be surprised if they tried it. However, my theory is that Bush himself thought there were some WMD's there, or at least traces of a program, BUT he probably knew or had a hunch that this was not the elaborate arsenal that the MSM was telling us. In order to get his war, he needed two things:
1. 9/11 and connections to the tragedy - Which would allow him to mould the public's support for the war under the guise of "terror" and "fear" and "mushroom cloud."
2. Exaggerated arsenal - He needed to say that Saddam had drums of antrax, drones filled with biological weapons, mobile labs, and a nuclear program months away from having the bomb. If he just said that Saddam "poses a threat" or "Saddam has the intent of building WMD's" the public would have hestitated and said "wait a minute, sure Saddam is a bad guy, but why is he an immediate danger to us? There are other countries out there that pose more of a problem, like...North Korea and Saudi Arabia."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
74. The MSM was telling us?
Hmmm.. Check out the State of the Union address he gave in 2003. I went to http://www.whitehouse.gov to try to find it but my stomach started knotting up, so I abandoned that search.

Someone here has the link, I imagine. The bottom line: BUSH and his devil masters put up the the whole charade. MSM fell in line.

That's my take on it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. WMD have 'fingerprints' and can be traced to the lab that made them.
THAT is the ONLY reason they didn't plant them. I learned that tidbit from Will Pitt's book with Scott Ritter, "War In Iraq"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
51. Too easy to get caught. Much like the Anthrax attacks.
It would take a chemist about a day to be able to say, This is the property of the US Government. Then comes the GAO audit of our stock piles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #51
76. Correct me if I'm wrong
but weren't ALL their weapons made in the USA? Or Russia. Okay. Still but, I find it very hard to believe they ever actually manufactured an original weapon.

Used them on his own people? Without a doubt. Seen the documentaries. But still. I just don't think they ever had 'labs', and I could be very mistaken. It happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Reagan/Bush gave him the sarin and mustard gas he used on Iran.
He also used some of it on the kurds. It was retalliation for a profidious attack on his army. But he was manufacturing his own bio/chem weapons. But all of that was detroyed by UNMOVIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. Most likely they did
But, Al Qaida got hold of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. Why do you think they got so mad at Joe Wilson?
I read some theory that his wife was involved in the part of the CIA would know it was fake, which was a backdoor reason to go after him.

A simpler explanation was he set a bad precedent of whistleblowing on this issue that made planting too risky.

I also vaguely remember a story someone getting caught at a port trying to set it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
55. Other--the CIA rebelled and refused to support the plant.
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 07:12 PM by BlueIris
People ask me why I continue to post on this website when many of its contributors make me apoplectic. THIS THREAD IS WHY. To me, the refusal of the intelligence communities to support Bush's illegal, destructive plans--and in a few rumored cases, actually sabotage them--is a major reason why Bush hasn't been able to do more damage. A friend I made during the campaign days, who was ex military-intel, agrees with me that the WMDs never materialized because "there are a few honest people left in this world." There are a lot of things to criticize about CIA and the military as both those groups exist today, (not ripping vets or others who serve, please don't flame me!) but the bravery of those who dared to oppose this facet of Bush's scheme isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
58. They did.
But true to form, they botched it. When "troops" opened the supposed cache, all they found was cases Cheerios and size "small" condoms.

Naturally, the bureaucrat responsible was promoted.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
59. Because the US is not the only country with high resolution spy satellites
And they were watching closely.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
60. rove wants to talk to you
and sign you up as a consultant.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
61. they couldn't find any WMDs to plant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedomfried Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
62. A smart crooked cop always carries a "throw down" pistol
but Bush was in Houston years ago when the one cop got caught doing just that.

Maybe that memory stuck in his booze soaked brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
65. I'm wondering how that last
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 07:46 PM by zidzi
choice got 6 votes??

You didn't have a choice for what I heard about this..I read on DU, long ago.. that they were all ready to "plant WMD" and some snafu happened and they were caught with their pants down and couldn't finish the job. Does that sound like one of their operations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
68. they tried and got caught a couple of times so abandoned the project
so many expected them to try that they couldn't get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
70. I thought I heard they had plans to do it, but Nancy Pelosi found out and
said she would blow it open to the public if they did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
72. They tried, but they bungled it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
73. Could be they did & lost them somewhere around blah, blah, blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Perhaps they did and the "insurgents" stole them.
That could be why Bush and gang were so insistant that there were WMDs in Iraq even in the face to all the evidence to the contrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #75
80. If insurgents found WMDs they'd have used them by now.
It's Bill Clinton's fault. He sneaked in there and stole them before they were found, so that he could sell them to China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
77. I am virtually certain someone would have 'ratted' them out
Of this fact I have no doubt. If the Bush administration had 'planted' WMDs in Iraq in order to save it's own sorry ass, somebody would spill the beans in a heartbeat. Who knows, maybe it may have been someone high up like Powell or Tenet. There are, were a few people in that admin who are still part of the human race. I am not a religious person but I will say this, Lord only knows what the reaction may have been if they had gotten caught doing it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. I think they are pretty well busted
even without the plants. Look around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
81. They did not care if there were WMD..
we're the little people. So who cares what we think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
83. One Word: Sattelites
Don't for one minute think the Russians, Chinese, and French didn't redirect their surveillance orbiters to watch Iraq. They would have been caught red-handed if they were moving hardware IN.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
84. Google "Nelda Rogers" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
86. For the last time people, we went to Iraq to liberate!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC