Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Call John Roberts's Bluff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 06:20 AM
Original message
Call John Roberts's Bluff
The Nation -- John Roberts, the President's nominee to become the seventeenth Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, says that the 1973 high court ruling that guaranteed a woman's right to choose is "settled as a precedent."
ADVERTISEMENT

Roberts told the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on his nomination that the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion is "entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis," the legal standard that long-established court rulings should not be casually challenged.

When pressed, Roberts suggested that only in extraordinary circumstances--when the precedent has proved to be "unworkable" or "difficult to apply"--should the Court even consider overturning settled law.

Since the
Roe v. Wade precedent has survived basically intact through three decades of legal and legislative assaults, and since it has not proved to be unworkable or difficult to apply, Roberts has effectively promised the Senate--under oath--that he will not seek as the Chief Justice to outlaw abortion or other reproductive rights.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20050919/cm_thenation/122955;_ylt=AtmG0s.Cw3yfS8iRCgpimM8e6sgF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3YWFzYnA2BHNlYwM3NDI-



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. No he hasn't
"When pressed, Roberts suggested that only in extraordinary circumstances--when the precedent has proved to be 'unworkable' or 'difficult to apply'--should the Court even consider overturning settled law."

I will be dollars to donuts that what he would do the day the first case came before him was to say that Roe is "unworkable" or that the precident is now "difficult to apply." And henceforth until it ceases to exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't trust him
Someone who can be that evasive under questioning will surely spring to life when installed.
He's a phony and will perform as bad as any of dubby's other appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe Naral or Planned Parenthood
should run with it. Can you just see his picture with that statement plastered all over the tv?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC