Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is it with Bushists and lawyers? I thought they were anti-lawyer.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:36 PM
Original message
What is it with Bushists and lawyers? I thought they were anti-lawyer.
:sarcasm:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/19/AR2005091901930_pf.html

washingtonpost.com
Immigration Nominee's Credentials Questioned

By Dan Eggen and Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, September 20, 2005; A01



The Bush administration is seeking to appoint a lawyer with little immigration or customs experience to head the troubled law enforcement agency that handles those issues, prompting sharp criticism from some employee groups, immigration advocates and homeland security experts.

The push to appoint Julie Myers to head the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, comes in the midst of intense debate over the qualifications of department political appointees involved in the sluggish response to Hurricane Katrina.

Concerns over Myers, 36, were acute enough at a Senate hearing last week that lawmakers asked the nominee to detail during her testimony her postings and to account for her management experience. Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio) went so far as to tell Myers that her résumé indicates she is not qualified for the job.

But Voinovich has since met with Myers and is now likely to support her, his spokeswoman said yesterday. Myers, who has attracted strong support from many former colleagues, told senators that she would draw upon the experiences of ICE veterans in running the agency.

"I realize that I'm not 80 years old," Myers testified. "I have a few gray hairs, more coming, but I will seek to work with those who are knowledgeable in this area, who know more than I do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. They just want trial lawyers for themselves
NOT for the average Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And certainly not to bring suit against large corporations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are anti- other people's lawyers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. IOKIYAR
That is, it's okay to be a lawyer if you're rethuglican.

Of course, they believed in States Rights, until they seized power.

They allegedly believed in limited government and fiscal restraint, neither of which they've shown the ability to exercise.

No big shocker, IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's also okay if you were a lawyer that went after Clinton.
Julie Myers was one of the prosecuters appointed by Starr that was hell bent on prosecuting Clinton on anything possible.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater/browse_thread/thread/6e34fd0f4d065c28/73ad6d259ac8fb1f?lnk=st&q=%22Julie+Myers%22+starr&rnum=5#73ad6d259ac8fb1f

Friends of Bush (Starr) strike again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC