lateo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 07:39 PM
Original message |
Debunk this anti-Clinton bs... |
|
I got this in an email.
Except for the fact that we later discovered that there was no legitimate reason for NATO intervention in Kosovo, that Clinton permitted Iranian arms to funnel into the Bosnian Mujahdeen against the UN arms embargo, that many of those arms went to supply the heroin-trafficking KLA, and the TIME/Newsweek accounts of mass genocide were largely fraudulent. All of this was done against the UN Security Council decision over the objection of France and Russia. Nowadays, the radical Muslims are burning churches in Serbian Kosovo and supporting/financing Al-Queda's bombers in the Madrid and London blasts.
|
neuvocat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"Except for the fact that we later discovered that there was no legitimate reason for NATO intervention in Kosovo,"
Given the lack of proof in that statement, this assertion is already off to an incredibly bad start.
" that Clinton permitted Iranian arms to funnel into the Bosnian Mujahdeen against the UN arms embargo,"
Wrong already. The problem was that the so-called "Christian" groups were murdering the muslims in droves. If anything, the Clinton admin may have turned a blind eye for quite a while until it finally got involved.
"that many of those arms went to supply the heroin-trafficking KLA, and the TIME/Newsweek accounts of mass genocide"
Again, give us a link to prove it. Don't tell us to look it up either.
"were largely fraudulent. All of this was done against the UN Security Council decision"
What was the resolution? Do they have the number for it and the text to specifically cite what was violated?
"over the objection of France and Russia."
Get quotes to prove this.
"Nowadays, the radical Muslims are burning churches in Serbian Kosovo" Link?
"and supporting/financing Al-Queda's bombers in the Madrid and London blasts."
And I guess while we're at it, what is the Bush administration doing about it?
|
lateo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Thank you for your time...
|
yankeedem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
3. My new rule for freeps |
|
THEY get to prove it. I'm sick of doing all the work for them.
|
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Agreed! Challenge them to prove it! |
|
I wonder how many times they'll reply 'rush said it'. :eyes:
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Ending a genocide isn't reason enough to commit US forces to a conflict. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message |