Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunk this anti-Clinton bs...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:39 PM
Original message
Debunk this anti-Clinton bs...
I got this in an email.



Except for the fact that we later discovered that there was no legitimate reason for NATO intervention in Kosovo, that Clinton permitted Iranian arms to funnel into the Bosnian Mujahdeen against the UN arms embargo, that many of those arms went to supply the heroin-trafficking KLA, and the TIME/Newsweek accounts of mass genocide were largely fraudulent. All of this was done against the UN Security Council decision over the objection of France and Russia. Nowadays, the radical Muslims are burning churches in Serbian Kosovo and supporting/financing Al-Queda's bombers in the Madrid and London blasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's your response:
"Except for the fact that we later discovered that there was no legitimate reason for NATO intervention in Kosovo,"

Given the lack of proof in that statement, this assertion is already off to an incredibly bad start.


" that Clinton permitted Iranian arms to funnel into the Bosnian Mujahdeen against the UN arms embargo,"

Wrong already. The problem was that the so-called "Christian" groups were murdering the muslims in droves. If anything, the Clinton admin may have turned a blind eye for quite a while until it finally got involved.

"that many of those arms went to supply the heroin-trafficking KLA, and the TIME/Newsweek accounts of mass genocide"

Again, give us a link to prove it. Don't tell us to look it up either.

"were largely fraudulent. All of this was done against the UN Security Council decision"

What was the resolution? Do they have the number for it and the text to specifically cite what was violated?


"over the objection of France and Russia."

Get quotes to prove this.

"Nowadays, the radical Muslims are burning churches in Serbian Kosovo"
Link?

"and supporting/financing Al-Queda's bombers in the Madrid and London blasts."

And I guess while we're at it, what is the Bush administration doing about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Excellent.
Thank you for your time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. My new rule for freeps
THEY get to prove it. I'm sick of doing all the work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed! Challenge them to prove it!
I wonder how many times they'll reply 'rush said it'. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ending a genocide isn't reason enough to commit US forces to a conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC