Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK. I don't like this one bit...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:06 PM
Original message
OK. I don't like this one bit...
http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=6110264&cKey=1127508644000&ticker=true

UN urges N. Korea to keep taking aid for children

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United Nations appealed to North Korea on Friday to think of its children and reverse its decision to stop accepting food aid at the end of this year.

"My heart goes out to the children, really, of North Korea," U.N. Emergency Relief Co-ordinator Jan Egeland said.

While the reclusive communist nation had made important gains in feeding its people over the past decade, 7 percent of its 22.5 million people were still starving and 37 percent remained chronically malnourished, he said.

"Our concern is they will not be able to have enough food," he said. "We are very concerned because we think this is too soon and too abrupt."

Egeland spoke to reporters a day after North Korean Deputy Foreign Minister Choe Su Hon told news agency reporters he had asked U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to end all humanitarian aid -- a term that typically includes food, medical supplies and other relief -- by the end of 2005.

Choe said he was doing so because his country's food production had improved and the United States was politicising the issue by linking aid to human rights, an allegation Washington strongly denied.


Why would a country of starving people refuse food? Do they not expect to need food next year for some reason? What would that reason be? Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heres my take.
"Why would a country of starving people refuse food? Do they not expect to need food next year for some reason? What would that reason be? Any ideas?" Because of their leader. look what our leader has done to our less fortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Might it be
they do not need it anymore?

I wonder.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Assume they need it...badly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Assume nothing
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 04:25 PM by oneighty
where USA relationship with North Korea is involved.

We are being conned into hating the North Koreans. They are an enemy of opportunity used to justify maintaining our foothold in Asia.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. 7% of it's people are starving, 37% chronically malnourished
I think it's a safe "assumption" they need the aid.

And Kim is a mad timebomb that's been all but ignored by the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yes. I am told he is a mad time bomb
Perhaps he is. I have no first hand information. Do you?

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You obviously know nothing about the government of N. Korea.
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 04:57 PM by tx_dem41
So your * hatred has now pushed you to the point where you don't see the government of N. Korea to be the tyrannical despots that they are. They care nothing about their people, yet you are willing to give them a pass because of your hatred for our government. This is definitely the ugly side of living in an echo chamber. In fact, is their a good side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Whoa there
I do not hate anyone including Bush and the Korean people either North or South. I was in the Korean War in 1952 and in Japan for a number of years after that and I do not hate the Japanese either.

One thing I have learned over the years is to question everything. If North And South Korea had been allowed to reunite over the years I expect things might be different today.

But I do not know. And the only thing I know about North Korea today is what I am told.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Politicizing food aid?
I smell Bolton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kim's only interested in his army
This probably means he can keep them fed without strain. He's always kept rest of the populace quarantined and weak, food aid or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. My former poli. sci. prof told us that Kim doesn't want...
his people to feel at all obligated to or helped by any other nation. I.e., if they got food packages with the UN symbol or the US (or any other) flag or symbol, they would think of that organization as being the one that feeds them. Then they might have some allegiance to that symbol and not to the state and to Kim.

Don't forget, and this is probably very important in their decision, Kim and his top officials (and the army) are NOT STARVING. They have plenty to eat. It is the average person who is starving and they have no say in whether or not they accept food. They would probably accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. kinda like dubya refusing foreign aid for katrina.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC