Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-23-05 05:25 PM
Original message |
As a Lakoffian-framing of the coming alternative energy political war, |
|
what do you think of the phrase "dirty energy?"
This is such a HUGE issue, and we need to get in front of it with our political framing.
I like this particular phrase, but maybe you could even come up with a better one.
|
villager
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-23-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. "Dirty energy" is good. "Death fuel?" |
|
We definitely need to frame this first
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-23-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. You don't think that goes too far? |
|
The problem with framing is that you have to be careful to exhibit "objectivity"- or, a lack of personal stake- in the connotations of the frame. Otherwise, it loses credibility.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-23-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The tightening noose of petroleum energy |
|
Poisoned power (nuclear reactors)
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-23-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. As Regards Petrol Industry- I'd call them the buggy whippers |
|
dinosaurs.
and i like dirty energy but would prefer something that implies unsafe energy or "threat to our national security energy"
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-23-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. We could come up with something more "dangerous".... |
|
Not "dangerous energy"...but, make use of a thesaurus...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |