Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Forced to Import Bullets (on Common Dreams)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatBoreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:24 PM
Original message
US Forced to Import Bullets (on Common Dreams)
Just found this. HOLY SHITE!

US forces have fired so many bullets in Iraq and Afghanistan - an estimated 250,000 for every insurgent killed - that American ammunition-makers cannot keep up with demand. As a result the US is having to import supplies from Israel.

A government report says that US forces are now using 1.8 billion rounds of small-arms ammunition a year. The total has more than doubled in five years, largely as a result of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as changes in military doctrine.

<snip>

Though millions of dollars have been spent on upgrading the facilities, they remain unable to meet current munitions needs in their current state. "The government-owned plant producing small-caliber ammunition cannot meet the increased requirements, even with modernization efforts," said the report.

"Also, commercial producers within the national technology and industrial base have not had the capacity to meet these requirements. As a result, the Department of Defense had to rely at least in part on foreign commercial producers to meet its small-caliber ammunition needs."

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0925-02.htm

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. Halliburton's gonna have to start making bullets soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Our armed forces must be really bad shots.
250,000 rounds for every insurgent killed...
Wait a minute, if they would count the Innocent civilians killed, that rate would probably drop to 2.5 rounds per dead body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I would have to guess it is one foreign suicide bomber
insurgent killed for every twenty innocent civilians killed. To many of us here on DU have family in Iraq to put up with this crap. It isnt their fault they are there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't really believe the article
if it was true there would also be a shortage on the civilian market for 5.56 ammo which there isnt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That was my first warning bell. Why isn't 5.56 or 9mm short in the U.S.?
And 1.8 billion-with-a-B rounds per year is simply not a credible figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly
if the ammo makers couldn't keep up the first thing they would cut is civilian sales as was done during WW 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Because
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 06:43 AM by Frederik
the Pentagon don't buy them from civilian manufactors? Apparently, there's a govt-run plant (only one? how can it produce enough?) which produces small-arms ammo for the military. Sounds like communism, lol.

On edit: Apparently there are three plants, run by contractors but owned by the govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. What part do you not believe?
I think, the way these guys do business, that there is a quid pro quo here -- if there is no shortage of ammo, then the importing must be covering a payoff. We purchase x amount of ammo at 25% above market prices and in return, Israel (or certain persons in Israel) agree to ... what?

Likud and the ultra-conservatives would not have the power they do without a lot of funding from the US - either the government or from civilian organizations. That funding of the radical right in Israel is what disenfranchised the leftists and Israeli peace movement.

A possibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. During the Viet war we had to buy back our surplus Korean war bombs
that we sold to Germany.
....At about 10 times the cost we sold them for.

They didn't care because it wasn't their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radar Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. This has happened before....
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 10:37 PM by radar
"...The protracted conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and heightened combat training with live ammunition have left the military short of small-caliber bullets. To offset the squeeze, the Army is taking unusual stopgap measures such as buying ammunition from Britain and Israel. It is also working to increase domestic production...."

Running Low on Ammo
Military Turns to Overseas Suppliers to Cover Shortages
By Renae Merle Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 22, 2004; Page E01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A4044-2004Jul21?language=printer


"It's been an open secret for a while now that the U.S. military is running low on ammunition. But a new supplier may be emerging, if foreign press reports are accurate. America may start buying some of its bullets from Taiwan...."
TAIWAN TO SUPPLY U.S. AMMO? January 11, 2005 07:58 AM
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001317.html

* Adding another link that mentions difference between civilian & military munitions.

"...Then there's the Army's apparent refusal to use old-fashioned lead munitions, easily available on the civilian market and often sold by the Army itself as surplus..."
...Buying commercial 5.56 and 7.62mm for training use is a bad idea, since their point of impact will differ greatly from the military issue loads. Commercial 5.56mm can hit 3-4 inches higher than point of aim, and that may well get people killed in a combat environment....


WindsOfChange.net by Joe Katzman at January 13, 2004 06:56 AM
http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/004462.php


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense...
...Buying commercial 5.56 and 7.62mm for training use is a bad idea, since their point of impact will differ greatly from the military issue loads. Commercial 5.56mm can hit 3-4 inches higher than point of aim, and that may well get people killed in a combat environment....

And if you hit what you are shooting at, the target doesn't die as dead?
You'd think that someone would stumble on the concept of just aiming lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOHICA06 Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hell, I was qualifying with Israeli .45 ammo in the 80s
it was the 7.69x39mm with the funny head-stamps that caught my attention. Contra or Afghan bound with foreign stamps from a US manufacturer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC