Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone please tell me. How does "Freedom isn't Free" apply to the war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:18 PM
Original message
Someone please tell me. How does "Freedom isn't Free" apply to the war?
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 11:30 PM by garybeck
Who is being freed? Us? the Iraqis? That statement makes no sense to me but I see it around.

ON EDIT: I"m referring to the CURRENT situation. I see people holding these signs and putting the sticker on their car. I understand what it means in the greater sense, but not in the current conflict, especially now that the new Iraqi constitution is drafted and there are not new freedoms.

So who are they referring to, when they hold up the sign to day? The Iraqis or us? Am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's been around for ages.
I remember it being in National Guard ads in magazines back in the seventies.

It means, basically, that freedom occasionally demands sacrifices from its citizenry. That the price of freedom is the blood of its defenders.

And next week, I'll tell you all about magnets!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. No, man! I can't wait
Tell me about magnets NOW! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. I prefer "Freedom is a two edged sword ..."
"... one edge being Liberty and the other being Responsibility." The author's contention was based on the contention that those who pursued liberty without regard to ideology could not possibly sustain freedom; those who insisted on responsibility while sifling liberty could produce only tyranny. His thesis was that only when a proper balance between Liberty and Responsibility is achieved can Freedom be attained.

Pity the Free Marketers, the so-called Libertarians, the Corporatist vampires that have for so long been ascendant just don't get that point. What Bush calls progress many regard, with reason, as the rape of the world and the squandering of the American future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I know, I'm talking about the CURRENT situation. I don't see how
it applies to today. ARe they referring to how we are supposedly freeing the Iraqi people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I believe...
...they're still clinging to the debunked idea that Iraq and Al Qaida are interrelated (of course they still believe that; there's no other possible justification for the invasion of Iraq).

I think they're saying that the shedding of American blood in Iraq is a justifiable expense which is keeping Joe Average American "free".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. so it's saying that Iraq was going to attack us, and if we didn't
pay the price and start the war, we would have been attacked and we would live in a colony of Iraq now, and we'd be less free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I think, more "accurately", that...
... the freep mindset is that attacking Iraq was one and the same as attacking Al Qaida... that even if it didn't kill a single Al Qaida operative, it crippled their finance network and sent a message "Don't Tread on Me!".

Nevermind that Saudi Arabia writes blank cheques to Al Qaida and that there are undoubtedly more Al Qaida operatives/sleeper cells in the US than in Iraq.

But, hey, it doesn't really hinge on logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. agressive military action keeps us free!
When Woodrow Wilson banned The "Nation" for opposing WWI, wasn't it the military that stopped him, and didn't the military keep Eugene Debs out of prison?

When the IWW tried to exercise their free speech rights, wasn't it the military that kept local vigilantes from lynching them?

When corrupt racist politicians tried to send Japanese Americans to detention camps, wasn't it the military that prevented this?

When African Americans tried to exercise the right to vote, wasn't it the marines that protected them against the Klan?

It wasn't?

But our military strength keeps us free, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. You know that expression that we get the government we deserve?
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 12:16 AM by CanuckAmok
I think the same applies to the military.

Having "been there, done that, got the t-shirt", I understand the the first objective of any military is to dismantle the notion of free will, and force the candidates/recruits to work as a unit, unquestioning and loyal to a fault.

The military can only be as good as the government which facilitates it. I don't want to sound elitist, but I think that's a fundamental difference between the Canadian Armed Forces (and most of the other NATO forces) and the US military; we were acting on behalf of a government and society which is non-expansionist/non-imperialist, and our training reflected that ideology of civil support and defence vs. offence.

That said, there is a repository of severely trigger-happy freaks in our military, too, and they always have the same moustache.

On edit: it was the Red Army who crushed the White Russian/ruling class resistance of the Peoples' Revolution. I'm sure there are dozens of othewr similar stories, but I can't cite any off-hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. the military protects our sovereignty
it protects our nation from foreign invaders

it does not protect our freedom from its most powerful enemies - corruption and intolerance from within.

The military does not really keep us free. Judges, lawyers, and other advocates for freedom who sacrifice their reputations and their lives do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. dupe dupe
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 09:53 AM by DBoon
dupe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Meso American civilizations required blood sacrifice
The Aztecs were notorious for this, and the Mayans also practiced human sacrifice though on a smaller scale.

The Spanish conquest put an end to that.

Brutal as the Spanish were, they could not stomach human sacrifice.

Leave it to Americans to revive this old idea.

Leave it to Americans to revive a practice that the barbarians of Baroque Spain found inhuman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CascadeTide Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. does Switzerland have this saying?
they haven't done too much bleeding and they seem to be doing OK :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. It refers to the idea that freedom must be defended at times. . .
and that the price for it is the lives of our soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. To quote Mr. Natural....
"It don't mean shit".

Nothing more than freeper double talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. It means to keep quiet about the war.
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 11:23 PM by JohnLocke
Freedom isn't free, so we must sacrifice our freedoms lest we lose them. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. It means: War is Still Good Business, Invest Your Kids. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. It means that in order to be free...
you have to give up all of your rights and sacrifice your first born son.

Freedom Isn't Free = propoganda prelude to the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Think of it this way.
"Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose,
Nothing don’t mean nothing honey if it ain’t free, now now."

I don't mean to call you honey and furthermore I have no idea what it means either.
Apologies to Ms Joplin RIP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. It means the same thing as "Why do you hate America?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Means you have to spend $5.6 billion per month
fighting a war against people who pose no threat to your freedom, until you get enough of them riled up against you that they finally do pose a threat to your freedom.
For more information: http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/quagmire/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. has a very long history
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 11:25 PM by nadinbrzezinski
in many ways going back to actually Jefferson, who once wrote (after the 1800 events) the tree of liberty requires the blood of patriots from time to time

Freeperland has taken this and completely changed its meaning... for Jefferson, and anybody who knows the history this means that at times we may even have to sacrifice lives to remain free from tyranny

For the freepers, well you know we are spreading democracy out there :sarcasm: hence we should be able and willing to sacrifice some lives in this

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I'm just talking about the current situation.
people are using it today. I see signs, stickers.... who is being freed? how does it apply to our current situation? it makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. That is when knowing the history is a good thing
For example I had a pro war chicken hawk tell me, freedom isn't free

You are right kid, it is not free, that is why I will pay the ultimate price if need to be to keep this coutry free

Eyes wide open, I see you get it

No, you mised it, I quoted Jefferson... about that tree of liberty... and tiranny

You are a commie (yes he missed who I was quoting he was proof possitive I was quoting Marx)

... to protect and deefend the Constittuon of the US against all enemies, both foreign and domestic...

His eyes got real big.

Yes kid, you are that threat to freedom, now speaking of freedom and your version of it, I will drive you to the recruiter right now.

he walked away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. There is no free lunch (for anyone)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Originally it meant you had to be willing to sacrifice in order to keep
the freedoms that we as Americans cherish.

Nowadays it means that you have to be willing to kill, exploit and swindle to maintain the illusion of freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.
Thomas Jefferson.

Boy, the Sheeple really fell down on that one, didn't they?

Here's another one by Robert Jackson:
The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish.

Ain't it the Truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Chimp is listening to bobby mcgee again drunk
He got the words wrongs. Just like how he misinterpets everything that the bible says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. That is part of the Repug spin. They try and act like fighting in Iraq
Edited on Sun Sep-25-05 11:30 PM by Maraya1969
equates with saving OUR freedom. Next time you see a sticker ask the person what it means. Ask them if they think Iraq has the capability to overtake our country. Ask them if killing terrorists in Iraq is going to stop terrorists that live in this country right now.

They have no answers and many have not even bothered to ask the question.

It is the same thing with "These colors don't run" I saw that around for a long time and finally realized that they are saying WE are not running from......What? We are fighting and not running.

The whole thing is insane but I think if you can ask "nicely" what those stickers mean to the person who has them they might actually begin to think for a change.

Edit once again because I cannot spill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. as you say, "Next time you see a sticker ask the person what it means."
I think that's a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. No, they will say Iraq = Al Qaida.
These are people who, if they are able to make the distiction between the hundreds of Middle Eastern cultures and ideologies, choose not to.

These are people who think all Ay-rabs are one and the same, and that they're all conspiring to destroy America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. It doesn't matter because no one will be able to kill off each and
every terrorist in the world. Remind them that Al-Qauida's headquarters in not in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well, it depends on who's saying it, IMO.
Militant republicans take the stance that you have to die for your freedom.

(True) Conservative Republicans are definitely thinking in monetary terms.

Anti Abortion Republicans are thinking that your freedom does not include your body.

Fans of Faux news are thinking that freedom does not include free speech, just theirs.

I'm sure I've left out a few but it's a start. It's a confusing term that no one really knows the true meaning to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. In this case Kristofferson was right
(made famous by Joplin)
Freedom's just another word
for nothing left to lose
and nothing
that's all that bush has left (fill in the blank)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. to me it has a double meaning....
Conservatives interpret it as meaning that freedom is an entitlement of citizenship and it is paid for by soldiers (mainly poor kids) on a distant battlefield that will engage in wars not only to defend our borders but to make sure we keep our global position and prosperity... freedom to them is based on a very materialistic thing... "God Bless America, etc."

Progressives take personal responsibility for our freedom. We realize that freedom is not a gift of god or an entitlement given to us by demigod heros on foreign fields, it is only reaped when we put in the hard labor of active citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. Used in the context of the occupation of Iraq is hilarious.
Freedom to form a hardline Islamic government that will be subject to endless attacks by disenfranchised Sunnis. "Freedom my ass", and the suckers in the good ol' USA continues to pay with blood and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. "Freedom my ass"
someone should make a sticker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. I first remember as a 60's song by the group "Up With People"
This doesn't have to do with the original poster's question, but I thought I would share that I first remember the song "Freedom Isn't Free" as one of a number of catchy tunes by the group "Up With People" in the 1960's; I remember them once coming to my high school.

Freedom isn't free.

Freedom isn't free.

You gotta pay a price,

You gotta sacrifice

For your liberty.


More about them here

http://xserver1.its.mu.edu/286034568604752.bsp

and here

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node=up%20with%20people

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
34. it only applies in a freepers insane or below-average mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Borgnine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
35. "Freedom isn't free. Thank a veteran."
Edited on Mon Sep-26-05 12:07 AM by Borgnine
I will, as soon as I find a survivor of the Revolutionary War.

(not that I'm disparaging veterans, but come on, that old chestnut is pretty empty)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. "freedom isn't free. Thank an ACLU Attorney"
I'd like to see THAT bumper sticker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC