Attacks Against Progressives ADVANCES THE CORPOROCRATS!!!

[Just Me]

You attack ANSWER: you advance the corporacrats (which, according to the father of fascism, Mussolini, are the fascists).

You attack Jane Fonda: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack Cindy: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack Jesse: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack Hillary: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack Kerry: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack Ramsey: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack the Peace House: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack Feinstein: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack MoveOn: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack AAR: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack LA's Governor: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack the ACLU: you advance the corporacrats.

You attack _______________ (name any and every progressive demeaned and/or ridiculed and/or "thrown away"): you advance the corporacrats.

GET CENTERED,...ALONG WITH THE REST OF US,...

WE ARE IN THIS,...TOGETHER!!! DROP THE FAUX DIVISIONS.

PLEASE.

please

[lcordero2]

1. Sorry but

A lot of those people that you named are the corporacrats.

[Walt Starr]

2. Attacks against the pretzledent ADVANCES THE TERRORISTS!!!

I knew I heard something similar somewhere before.

[obxhead]

3. so even if

one of your above mentioned is doing/saying something I completely disagree with I should support them because of their label.
my example: Hillary.
While I don't want to outright attack her I don't agree with a lot that she does and says. She won't get support from me just because she's labeled as a Democrat. I try to go by actions not a group affiliation.

[The Magistrate]

4. It Is A Pleasure, Ma'am

To see you listing Semators Clinton and Kerry as progressives. They are routinely described by some in quite differenmt terms, and improperly so, in my view....

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"

[Old and In the Way]

Spare us.

Are we going to have an ideological litmus test that we need to satisfy? Are you going to be the official arbiter of the truth?

Is this the full list or will you be updating it regularly, comrade?

[Redstone]

6. I'm with you on this one. The OP seems a bit Maoist in his/her rigidity.

Besides, what the hell is a "corporacrat?" (Or a "corporocrat," since the OP spells it both ways.) Maybe I'm out of the loop, but I don't know what that word means.

I own a company; does that mean I'm one of them, whatever they are?

Redstone

[LynneSin]

9. What he said - I agree

:D

[QC]

5. Yer eether with us er agin us!

Hmmm, that has a familiar ring to it.

[crispini]

8. Yup. Is the OP channelling GWB?

Hmmm.....

Attacks on the Bush administration are attacks on AMERICA! Sounds exactly like something Rush would say.

[LynneSin]

7. Your posts are getting as bad as ANSWERS lies

Seriously, you think any of us here are negative on the likes of Cindy, Kerry, Hillary, Jesse, Ramsey or even the ACLU?

Pul-LEASE. You're pulling an answer on us by tossing in unrelated stuff to the main subject. Do you work for IA or something?

I can probably speak for many of us here at DU in saying that we have a problem with International Answer. But I think we can also agree that by trying to lump IA in with things that we do love & support like Cindy, Kerry, Ramsey, Hillary, Jesse, etc - that basically you're pulling an IA stunt.

We're not as dumb as we come off in our posts, try not to treat us like that!