FAUX NEWS HAVE STARTED TO SPIN BIGTIME

[brettdale]

"EVEN FOR FAUX, THIS IS REALLY REALLY REALLY BAD, BOY AND WE THOUGHT THEY WENT AFTER CINDY, POOR RONNIE"


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170738,00.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170732,00.html

[Dr.Phool]

1. Oh Jesus Christ Gibson!

Is there anyone in the United States who doesn't believe Tom Delay is a crook?

[Bernardo de La Paz]

2. Wow! The column seemed written for Grade 3 reading level

Wow! The column seemed written for Grade 3 reading level. I don't often Faux, so should I be amazed at this, or is it typical for Faux?

[OhioChick]

5. Well.........

Look at their audience. Need I say more?

[Angry Girl]

7. This is typical of them. News FOR illiterates BY illiterates.

A recent example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=4870275#4870490

[OhioChick]

8. LOL

Nice catch! Speaks volumes. :rofl:

[Hissyspit]

3. Britt Hume was spinning big time on the TV this afternoon nt

[Chipper Chat]

9. O'Lielly was surprisingly critical of DeLay.

Cant stand the dude, but he was pretty pragmatic on "if Tom is guilty he should pay the price" in contrast with his guest - KellyAnn Conway - who had her nose up DeLay's butt.

[zoeb]

4. you linked the dumbest anchor at Faux...

Goofy Gibson.

[proud2BlibKansan]

6. Denial

is just a river in Egypt to these assholes.

[savemefromdumbya]

10. sounds like Fox is stuck for somethig to say!

Isn't it nice for a change to see Fox stewing in their own juice? They are finding it hard to dredge something up to counteract the De Lay thing

[pa28]

11. It took brass balls to go after an indictment.

Earle must have known the right wing media would come after him with the usual smear and slime tactics.

All the more reason to believe it's an air-tight case.

[The_Casual_Observer]

12. John Gibbon, that isn't fair and balanced. I am shocked.

[berni_mccoy]

13. "going after Tom DeLay because a check went here instead of there..."

No, he's going after Delay because he SENT a check here instead of there (breaking a state law).

[Warren DeMontague]

14. So, uh, how come district gerrymandering for the GOP in Texas is okay

but in California it's so partisan and unfair that it REQUIRES a ballot initiative... and a Diebold-Friendly GOP installed SOS to oversee a special election?

[LaPera]

15. Republican spin...However, the facts are glaring! So attack the messenger.

(Thanks, Randi).

[OneBlueSky]

16. hell, I just couldn't resist . . . I mean . . .

there at the end of Gibson's article was his e-mail link . . . s-o-o-o-o-o . . . I dropped him a line . . . just for the halibut . . .

john-boy . . .

do you have ANY idea how completely stupid you sound? . . . I mean, people are LAUGHING at you! . . .

just keep whoring for the BushCo criminal enterprise, and you'll go right down the tubes with them . . . couldn't happen to a more deserving fella, imo . . .

sleep well . . . lots more prostituting to do tomorrow, don'tcha know . . .

less than cordially,

A VERY Infrequent Viewer
(only when I need to remind myself how completely irrelevant the "mainstream" media have become)

[brettdale]

21. we should all email Gibson

Make it a mass email campgain.

The Big Story with John Gibson

[e-mail]

[HardWorkingDem]

17. Hume means DeLay isn't a "bully"?

Jeez, I'm glad he cleared that up. Guess his nickname "The Hammer" means he's really a good carpenter.....

[dutchdemocrat]

18. Spin Machine in Action...

[brettdale]

20. That is really disgusting

That is really disgusting.

[Binka]

22. That's Their Best Defense? DeLay Is In Some Deep Shit!

Usually Faux puts on a full court press when one of their own is being scrutinized. This is their main man after Bush and this is what they deliver. Holy shit this is like sending in the cheerleaders and cleaning crew to play the Spurs.

Tommy Turd Is Gonna Get MotherFucking Hammered.

[Guaranteed]

19. The whoredom is ridiculous.

"Transparent prosecution?" Well, THAT'S a new one, isn't it?

If I recall correctly, a prosecutor is supposed to hold up their side of the argument as best as they can.

Should we be looking for a "transparent defense," as well?

Well, yes, I guess we should be. Right, John?