ck4829
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:53 AM
Original message |
Able Danger?! What's that? |
|
Remember when everybody said that Able Danger failed because of Clinton?
Everybody, and I mean everybody, was talking about it.
Now, we know that the 9/11 Commission did not talk about Able Danger because the Chairman (And he had the power to make sure things such as Able Danger stayed out of the 9/11 Commission) of that Commission was a Bush Buddy. We also know that Able Danger was axed during Bush's Term.
Why doesn't the 'liberal' Media want to talk about Able Danger anymore?
|
tompayne1
(346 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I mean i thought it was somebody's name at first so i think it was just because of a lack of knowledge about the subject in general. Not sure though,
|
ck4829
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Wikipedia is a terrific resource. |
tompayne1
(346 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
Squatch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It's a new Tom Clancey book. |
ck4829
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 09:56 AM by ck4829
|
SillyGoose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I figure their silence about it is because they can't pin the blame on |
|
Clinton; that it might in fact show the * admin dropped the ball on this instead. They can't have that, can they?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |