Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC goes both ways

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 03:56 PM
Original message
MSNBC goes both ways
Barbie Bubblehead just explained, for the bazillionth time, that Tom Delay was "indicted by democratic prosecutor Ronnie Earle." Blah Blah. But then went on to say "But the Austin Statesment (?) featured a blistery editorial saying 'Delay has no one to blame but himself," and goes on to re-print the newspaper's editorial describing how it was a Grand Jury made up of dedicated local citizens who sacrificed a lot of their time in this difficult investigation.

So, keep repeating the lie, but flash a quick video footnote to cleanse yourselves, eh?

Well, at least the did get the Grand Jury fact out there finally! I haven't seen anyone else mention it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Olbermann...
must be a real pain in their ass. Go Keith Go !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Austin American-Statesman
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 04:01 PM by gkhouston
local paper, home to Ben Sargent (great political cartoonist). Agreed with the other poster about Olbermann being a thorn in their side. Go Keef!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. No prosecutor can arbitrarily indict someone!
The Supreme Court must do the indicting based on whether or not they feel there is enough evidence for a trial. Guess what? The Supreme Court felt there was enough evidence to go forward with a trial, so there ya go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC