fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:42 PM
Original message |
| Whatever will they do when Scalia decides that it's payback time? |
|
Hell, he handed the Presidency to the ingrate! Why should he vote in his favor now? Nothing to lose, IMHO. EVERYTHING TO GAIN! Paybacks are a bitch! We know from experience that these thugs eat their own! Little Lord Pissypants may have really screwed himself this time. Time will tell.
peace.
|
| trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. He knows as well as anyone that the goals of the neocon movement |
|
are long and far-reaching. Roberts is a spring chicken compared to Scalia or even Thomas at this point, and in all likelihood will enforce the neocon agenda for at least another 3 decades.
|
| fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. He was a no-show today. |
|
It's hard to believe he would pass up the opportunity...
Spring chicken, maybe. But Scalia/Thomas may just decide that they've had it with BROKEN PROMISES...
Who knows?
|
| newscott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Maybe he was busy planning his next hunting trip with Cheney? |
| LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 05:47 PM by LisaM
typical Shrub. And after he was looking forward to dinner with Anthony, err, Antonio, too.
|
| salinen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Scalia will surprise all when he votes to uphold roe.
|
| fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Following in the footsteps of his "good buddy Dick"... |
|
Go F*ck Yourselves!!!!!!
:spray:
|
| Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Careful, he might call Uncle Vito about an "unjust promotion over me." |
| fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
|
| question everything
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Doesn't he have a son living off this administration? (nt) |
| fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. I don't know. I think Scalia has a few surprises in store... |
|
Just a wishful guess!
Peace.
|
| tx_dem41
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Do you ever think we over-analyze things a teensy-weensy bit |
| SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. No. Unless of course we do. |
|
And then it would matter.
Unless of course it doesn't.
:evilgrin:
|
| Sal Minella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. And then it would matter, unless of course it doesn't. Well, I have |
|
thought about this a great deal and concluded we DO analyze things too much but since the analysis is the point, and not the things being analyzed, it doesn't matter.
|
| fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. I know one thing for certain. No analysis needed to be certain that |
|
none of the rat bastards like to lose. Period.
Peace.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
