Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No you can NOT"Indict a ham sandwich". That's BALONEY!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:15 AM
Original message
No you can NOT"Indict a ham sandwich". That's BALONEY!
The cReeps are parroting that line right now & they are confused (as ususal) about our legal system. One can SUE or file suit against a ham sandwich. It would be virtually impossible, however, to persuade a Grand Jury hand down an indictment of said ham sandwich. Surely the ham sandwich would be no-billed.

Please, DU'ers--Friends don't let friends confuse civil law with criminal law.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Right on!
You can whip my potatoes but ya can't beat my spuds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. uhm, sorry, but they've got the expression right
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 11:20 AM by unblock
the old legal saw is that a good prosecutor can convince a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. the expression is meant to mock this step as any real protection against errant prosecutions because charismatic prosecutors can easily overwhelm grand juries.

it is true that you can actually sue virtually anyone for anything, though the result may be having your case quickly thrown out. but the "ham sandwich" quote does not relate to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. here's a link:
apparently this old legal saw isn't quite as old as i had thought:

http://www.barrypopik.com/article/84/indict-a-ham-sandwich

"Indict a Ham Sandwich"
This famous modern legal term began in New York. It was immortalized in the Tom Wolfe novel, Bonfire of the Vanities (1987).

I spoke with Sol Wachtler, the former New York State chief judge, and he admitted that the phrase was his and was coined during a lunch interview with Marcia Kramer of the New York Daily News. Wachtler – who is Jewish – told me that he regrets that he didn’t say “pastrami” sandwich, adding that he may (surely) have been misquoted about “ham.”

From the New York Daily News, January 31, 1985, pg. 3:

New top state judge: Abolish
grand juries & let us decide
By MARCIA KRAMER
and FRANK LOMBARDI
IN A BID to make prosecutors more accountable for their actions, Chief Judge Sol Wachtler has proposed that the state scrap the grand jury system of bringing criminal indictments.

Wachtler, who became the state’s top judge earlier this month, said district attorneys now have so much influence on grand juries that “by and large” they could get them to “indict a ham sandwich.”

From pg. 46:

New York State’s top judge speaks out
DAILY NEWS
NewsMaker
Chief Judge Sol Wachtler
Sol Wachtler, newly appointed chief judge of the New York Court of Appeals, was questioned at a Daily News NewsMaker lunch this week. Following are excerpts from his discussion with senior Daily News news executives and members of the editorial board and news staff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. More on Disgraced Republican Sleazy Ex-Judge Wachtler:
The affair between (Republican) Chief Judge Sol Wachtler and socialite Joy Silverman resulted in a ruined career, a family disgraced, and an intensely private affair made public.

http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm?qwork=1800566&wauth=Wolfe%2C%20Linda&matches=92&qsort=r&cm_re=works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not only can you indict a ham sandwich but if that sandwich
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 11:29 AM by henslee
does not have enough of a warchest ($$$) to hire solid counsel, that ham sandwich will be forced to cop a plea and will be convicted regardless of how ridiculous charges may be. BTW, the U.S government has something like a 90+ pecent conviction rate... largely due to the fact that most defendents cop pleas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have a beef with this post. Too Cheesy. Puts us in a pickle.
Well, I better ketchup with other threads. No more rye commentary,

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Somebody get a rope....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Mayo beg your forgiveness
Tis the season to to salt such comments away, lest we get peppered with shells. Shotgun shells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Question is, can you indict the whole salami?
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 12:14 PM by StopThePendulum
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. or the whole nine enchiladas?
or a month of sundays?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. We can indict the whole 9 yards of salami
or 27 feet of enchiladas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It doesn't rhyme. It kneads a better meter.
D agony of D feat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. SCOTUS would protect the Ham Sandwich on grounds of low IQ and high flavor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC