Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SC nom Miers nominated to PROTECT Buschco in future prosecutions??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:15 PM
Original message
SC nom Miers nominated to PROTECT Buschco in future prosecutions??
Have read the threads here about Miers for SC. Perhaps you legal sleuths could summarize for me:

If she is Bush's personal attorney, can she rule on cases against bush and/or his administration, such cases being crimes similar to ones alleged against the Delay gang, or possibly to be alleged in Plame case related charges?

Or will this woman legally have to recuse herself from any and all cases against the bush administration and its members, including the republican party?

Msongs
www.msongs.com/clark2008.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recuse herself? Scala didn't for Cheney. I don't expect her to. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corbett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me Neither
Let's not forget the pending case against Bushco in federal court in Pennsylvania for allowing 9/11 to happen. I can see that going to the Supreme Court over the issue of whether they can be tried while in office. They'll need to have people on the bench like Meiers, Roberts and Scalia who believe in the Gonzales version of the constitution to keep them out of the pokey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. couldn't she protect him better by voting than by recusing?
I really don't follow the logic of these threads suggesting that there is some sinister plot relating to confidential communications between her and the White House? Anyone care to explain?

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC