Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HuffPo: Bush Had Senate Democratic Leadership Approve Miers !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:34 PM
Original message
HuffPo: Bush Had Senate Democratic Leadership Approve Miers !!!
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:40 PM by Lex
:wtf:


Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers apparently pre-approved by Democrats
Posted: October 3, 2005
9:22 p.m. Eastern

President Bush today nominated a Texas lawyer who serves as White House counsel, Harriet Miers, to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court – a pick that apparently was pre-approved by Senate Democratic leadership.

In choosing Miers, Bush tapped a person who has never been a judge and therefore has no judicial record for opponents to criticize.

The Miers choice will likely be a disappointment to conservatives who hoped Bush would choose someone with a stronger "originalist" record.

"It looks like he flinched," commented Fox News analyst Bill Kristol. "It looks like a capitulation."




http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46630

*OR*

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2005/10/03/bush-had-senate-democrati_n_8289.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hrm. Bush whipped, or Bush gladly selling out religious right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Don't buy it for a second.
He has Reid fooled. That's the only reason that he'd do it.

Does anyone here honestly believe that Bush would check a candidate with Dems before nominating if he wasn't certain that the nominee would be as crackpot righty as possible when the time comes?

This woman is Clarence Thomas: Loyal, grateful, and obedient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. How is World Net Daily supposed to be the same as Huffpo? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Got it right off the big Splash on the front of the Huff Po is how.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:40 PM by Lex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Attribution went to World Net Daily. The question
is, why is the Huff Post using them as a source when they're so suspect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hmmm.
What stories did they call wrong?

I honestly don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I had a conversation last week about
World Net Daily. A 'friend' sent me an article by Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, full of racist blather. When I told him his racism was showing, his excuse was Peterson was an African American. I asked on DU about this source, and learned WND is a really rw source that is rarely accurate. So that's how I came to the conclusion HuffPost might try other sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope the Dems were just saying "please, please don't throw
in that briar patch." * nominated someone totally unqualified AND pissed off his base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I like the part where he pissed off his base.
Not so much that she's totally unqualifed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. What is Reid's position on abortion?
Isn't he "pro-life" -- not sure, but I believe I have read this. If you know for sure, please clarify. I believe this is why he has been pushed to the forefront of the party -- to attract the moderate right, but I believe this is also why he will never be the "standard-bearer."

If Reid is "pro-life" it would have been a slick move for Bush* to run Miers by him.

I believe her nomination is pure political payback. I don't think it has too much to do with the abortion issue. Although, as a Catholic, she might be inclined to strike it down.

Because of her absolute loyalty to Bush*, I think however much time she serves she will vote in a way he would approve of on issues.

And, of course, the question remains, what exactly does Bush think about the abortion issue. I believe he is privately pro-choice, but has used the issue and to "bring along" the conservative right. Laura Bush was interviewed on this subject in early 2001. She said she was pro-choice, mentioned that Barbara was pro-choice, and when asked about her husband, said "I think he is too."

Following that remark, she was promptly cloistered by the Republican party for six months, and did not emerge from the corner until about June of that year. She has publicly never mentioned the subject again (that I am aware of).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Old rule of politics...
"when your enemy is committing suicide.... do nothing to stop them"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC