Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers = Clarence Thomas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:42 PM
Original message
Miers = Clarence Thomas
She will do whatever she is told out of loyalty and gratitude.

I see no reason to believe that she has the background or the constitution to be a strong or independent voice on this court.

She will be a Bush/Right Wing puppet, just like Thomas before her.

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Brownie Twins = His and His? His and Hers? Whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not sure I get what you're saying.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:51 PM by tasteblind
I'm saying that Thomas was someone who was nominated by a Bush because

A> He was black, and gave Bush non-racist points when he desperately needed them, and

B> He could be counted on to rule any way the Bushes wanted him to.

Miers was nominated because

A> She's a woman, and everyone said Bush needed a woman this time, and

B> She's loyal and proven as far as Bush is concerned. She will do what she is told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourStarDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think the 1st post was refering to Michael Brown, as in another cronie.
One thing we know for sure, Bush doesn't care about substance in any position. He likes his cronies, especially the ones that can protect him and line his pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I say they are both underqualified for the position


They are just like Brownie FEMA for Bush.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Got it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kiss Roe V. Wade goodbye if the Senate confirms her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Old pro-Roe majority was 6-3.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 08:00 PM by Zynx
Roberts replacing Rehnquist keeps it at 6-3 and possibly makes it 7-2(I'm not totally convinced he would overturn Roe) and even IF Miers is a pro-life zealot, the vote is 5-4. Last time I checked, 5-4 is a majority.

Kennedy, Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Souter are all pro-Roe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Kennedy is not dependably pro-Roe
He had to be lobbied hard to switch from Rehnquist's position in Planned Parenthood vs Casey. In recent years he's been signalling the return of his old discomfort with Roe.

Kennedy seems to have a history of sitting between positions with anguish as the two sides of the court tug at him, probably the most notable being the Florida fiasco. Breyer stills thinks if he had another 24 hours, he could've flipped Kennedy for Gore. Doesn't say much for Kennedy's convictions as a jurist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. In an actual vote that would decide the fate of Roe, I doubt he would
vote to overturn. He doesn't seem like the sort of guy who would want to go down in history as the creator of absolute political chaos on the state and local level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Exactly. People make such a stink about Roe, but they forget:
the judge who tips the balance of the scale will live in infamy forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thin thread to hang our hopes on
In any calculus I wouldn't count on Kennedy's vote. Whichever side gang-presses him most effectively is the one that prevails. On Roe v Wade, that used to include O'Connor. No more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I rely on my fundamental belief the Republican establishment does not
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 09:19 PM by Zynx
want Roe overturned*. Besides, I am more than willing to bet Kennedy would not vote to overturn Roe in a serious vote. I think that vote is as reliable as Souter's in that regard.

*Ever notice that a majority of Republican appointed justices since Nixon have been pro-choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMoonBat Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. ...with boobies.
Sorry, had to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Nice one. Welcome to DU.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. All this RW outrage is totally phoney
she is nothing but one of them and I 'hope' the Democrats don't fall for it but I'm sure they will. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. We'll see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC