Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"FLAWED INDICTMENT"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:16 PM
Original message
"FLAWED INDICTMENT"
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 08:28 PM by Beetwasher
Ok people, get ready, this is the spin, but here's what I see as the REAL story:

Remember when Delay was first indicted? He waived the statute of limitations on the charge of conspiracy. It was a lesser charge than money laundering and there was speculation that he copped a deal. I think that's still operative, only he decided to go BACK on his word. The prosecutor decided to go ahead w/ the more serious charges. The grand jury today was probably presented w/ the ALL THE WORK and EVIDENCE and FINAL REPORT that was all ready to go. THAT'S why it turned in it's verdict so quickly. It was all nicely wrapped up in tight little bow and just waiting for Delay to be the piece of vermin he is and go back on his deal to plead to the lesser charge. Earle struck like a viper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. It could happen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh this is really getting exciting! Time to pay the piper Tom! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was wondering how that went down.....
are speculating or is that how it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Pure Speculation
But I think it's the most likely explanation that would explain the events, including the initial waiver. Why would Delay ever give them that waive unless he copped a plea? He copped a plea so as to not be indicted on money laundering, which can carry a life sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Correct me if I'm wrong but on the 6 pm CBS news
Delay has been indicted on money laundring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Yup, That's What We're Discussing!
The new indictments. There are actually TWO new ones!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thanks, Its good and getting better
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. He reneged on his plea bargain
and so Earle is coming at him with both barrels. He'll seek prison time, too.

I figure DeLay will spend at least three years behind bars in this one, and it will be in a penintentiary not a jail. He could have gotten off with no time in prison at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. woooooohoooooooo
tell me it is not federal. Tell me he could end up in say....Huntsville! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. 100% State of Texas charges, thus all time would be spent in Texas. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Oh that's fantastic! Huntsville. Ha. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Probably end up in Seagoville
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. What did he do to go back on the plea bargain? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. He tried to get the charges dismissed
which means he reneged on his end of the deal. Plus mouthing off about the prosecutor probably didn't help him much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Really, stupid idiot, a deal with no jail time and he's gotta go get
all arrogant and pushy and whiny...

Tom DeLay has it coming to him; he's getting what he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. One word for you regarding prison time
PARDON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It sure as hell can't come from Bush! He CAN'T Pardon Delay on this
It'd take Governor Goodhair to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Oh they'll find a way
they always do.....remember all these guys know where the other guys bodies are burried - they have to take care of each other.

I'm waiting for the day when they don't get away with it anymore!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why didn't they announce the plea bargain Friday?
Did Delay renege earlier than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. They Would Never Publicize That
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 08:28 PM by Beetwasher
Not right away anyway, it would only become evident in court when he entered his plea. Delay would want it kept as quiet as possible for as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Plea Bargains are never "announced"
They are made behind closed doors. You only know there was a plea bargain after the plea is entered, and then only by looking at the plea, the potential charges, and the sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Someone analyzed the indictment last Friday
and if you read between the lines, it looked like Delay had made a deal to plead guilty to a lesser charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I love it when you talk dirty
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Nothing Dirtier than Laundered Money!
Oh yea baby! Talk to me about felonies!! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Not too many people know
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 09:39 PM by DoYouEverWonder
that Jeb Bush's longtime business partner Armando Codina first made himself rich laundering drug money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. And THAT begs the question
How was the money laundered and who was involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. dirt, dirty girl
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. who? me?
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. You could be on to something there.
And I fervently hope that you are right.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. .
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
31. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. Makes good sense...
I was convinced early on that a deal had been struck. I mean, why else would his lawyer waive? Nothing else makes sense. I hope Delay is shitting his pants right now. Something gives me a feeling reneging wasn't a bright move, Earle wasted no time putting the smack down on that plan. Having your lawyer on talk shows 24 hours a day to attack a DA isn't very bright either. Money Laundering can carry a life term, no? Earle is much brighter that the right wing gives him credit for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yup, Possible Life Sentence
Though I highly doubt that would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Oh, I know he won't end up getting life out it.....
I would think though, if he is found guilty, he won't be walking away without jail time. With that plea, I doubt he would have done any jail time at all. If he's guilty, he'll do time. Yea! Hell, I don't even care if it's a couple years, I just want to see his ass behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. This is EXACTLY what I thought when I heard of the new indictments.
I was saying this same thing to my sweetie yesterday
(as I did my little happy-dance).

The first indictment makes it clear
that Delay had cut a deal;
there's really NO other explanation
for the statement that he had
WAIVED HIS RIGHTS re: the statute of limitations UNDER ADVICE OF COUNSEL.

But part of a "plea bargain" is KEEPING YOUR END OF THE BARGAIN;
Delay, arrogant and drunk on his own power,
just couldn't bring himself to honor his own WORD.

Then, after breaking the deal,
he and his lawyer spend an entire week on national TV
SLANDERING the prosecutor they had made the deal with.

Not smart. Not smart at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. No the roach killer is not as smart as he thought he was...he's not a
lawyer...and the one he's got has prove to be a dumbass too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC