Anyone else notice this?

[proud2BlibKansan]

Check out these two pictures of Harriet Miers.

How long ago was this one taken?


Does she not look a couple hundred years older in this picture from this morning?

How long will she serve? Any wagers?

[havocmom]

1. uh, what pictures?

pics are AWOL

[proud2BlibKansan]

2. I got one of them fixed

give me a minute to fix the other one.

Sorry about that.

[havocmom]

3. It happens

;)

[Obiepup]

4. She is 60 years old

n/t

[havocmom]

5. One is a formal photo session type and has been retouched

the one today is as-is; no proper lighting, posing, retouching. Not flattering. Real life is not always pretty.

But rather than dwell on how she looks, let's check her qualifacations (or lack there of) for the job.

[proud2BlibKansan]

6. I am not trying to be petty or catty

I am just wondering if she is not a well woman. How long will she be on the SC?

I can't help but wonder WHY she was selected.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4958662&mesg_id=4958662

[Laelth]

7. My initial analysis of her judicial leanings ...

can be found here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2130848

I hope you'll find that thread a useful starting point.

-Laelth

[bluedonkey]

8. Is it just me...

or does she look like the 'churchlady'?