Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sorry folks, but you have to read this freeper rant......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:27 AM
Original message
Sorry folks, but you have to read this freeper rant......
To: Rebelbase
Read this, and then you tell me.



GEORGE THE BETRAYER AND HARRIET WHO

Actually, we do know where she stands.

Harriet Miers.

The president’s pick for the Supreme Court. The Texas nobody.

She has a record and it tells us all we need to know about her.

During the Reagan Revolution, she was a Democrat. Until the George W. Bush star began to rise, she donated to Democratic politicians – like Al Gore and Lloyd Bentsen. She has donated directly to the Democratic National Committee. Her Republican contributions did not begin until George W. Bush became her political patron.

In a career that has spanned an era in which individual liberty has been repeatedly attacked by big government, and the judiciary has grown imbalanced and tyrannical, she hasn’t written or said a word in opposition or protest. Nor has she been any sort of pioneer for women’s rights – having spent the bulk of her legal career with a woman already sitting on the Supreme Court.

If she wasn’t the president’s friend, no one would know her name. She had a very nice legal career in Dallas, but is in no way an attorney, judge, scholar or thinker of national stature.

Further, she was specifically recommended for this position by Harry Reid, the outspoken and liberal leader of Senate Democrats.

Finally, the most telling piece of her record is the pattern of policy initiatives to come out of the White House during her tenure as the president’s top lawyer. During her year, the Bush Administration has emphasized big government at the expense of the Constitution. The recent suggestion by the president – which he undoubtedly developed with his legal counsel – that the federal government take over disaster response from the states, and put the military in charge, spits in the face of the Tenth Amendment.

And Harriet Miers signed off on it.

That tells us all we need to know about her.

She says she supports what the framers of the Constitution wanted, but as the president’s top lawyer she didn’t stop him from going against the clear intent of those same framers.

She’s a George W. Bush lackey, and that’s not good enough. We don't trust him that much anymore. And it is an incredible act of ingratitude, gall and arrogance for George W. Bush not to recognize that and take a different course.

George W. Bush is president today because he promised American conservatives that he would appoint conservatives to the Supreme Court. With a half century of uninterrupted liberal dominance, conservatives feel that the Supreme Court has been hijacked and that it has become a political arm of government, instead of a strict defender of the Constitution.

George W. Bush said he’d change that.

And history was ripe to let him.

With the Supreme Court having done a great deal of its most divisive business with 5-4 votes, and with Republican-appointed Sandra Day O’Connor being the swing vote in 75 percent of those cases, and that most typically on the liberal side, the seat George W. Bush has promised to Harriet Miers is the seat that makes all the difference.

It was the entire reason he was elected.

Conservatives wanted sanity in the courts. They elected him to put it there.

And yesterday he kicked them in the teeth.

A great many true legal scholars and true conservatives were passed over for a cipher. People whose thoughts were known, people who had not hidden away all their lives, were passed over so a seat on the Supreme Court could be given out to a close friend. The swing vote was left to twist in the wind.

It was an act of cowardice and treachery.

Because it was George W. Bush who told conservatives he would appoint “another Thomas or Scalia” if they re-elected him. And they did. The difference in his second election was the “values vote,” and that came from conservatives worried about the courts.

And this is how he has repaid them.

The lame duck has become chicken little.

Either not truly committed to the conservative cause, or afraid to make a stand against Democrats in the Senate, George W. Bush punted on the single biggest decision of his presidency.

And then he sent Dick Cheney out to promise that in 10 years we’d all be glad Harriet Miers was on the court.

What a disappointment and betrayal.

Instead of using his second term to courageously pursue the agenda he preached, the son has become the father and we’re faced with another not-quite-Republican President Bush. After all the money conservatives gave, after all the votes, after all the effort, after all the promises, he took the easy way out and left his supporters in the dust.

Conservatives gave the Republicans the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. No other group has been as faithful to the GOP or as essential to its success. And this is how they are repaid.

The one thing they wanted is the thing they will not get.

We do know where she stands.

Right next to George W. Bush.

And given his conduct of the last two or three years, that’s reason enough for conservatives to oppose her.




23 posted on 10/04/2005 6:12:01 AM PDT by conservativecorner
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies >


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1496274/posts#comment?q=1

PS It is so much fun to see them explode in on themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autonomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush has finally become the "uniter not a divider"
he promised he would be. Americans are uniting against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is probably a "true believer" conservative. Not a "Neocon".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. "the outspoken and liberal" Harry Reid
LMFAO :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, that caught my eye too!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. More liberal than Rush - but hardly outspoken and liberal.
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catamount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting read--thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. This Buffoon Exposed Himself
"With a half century of uninterrupted liberal dominance, conservatives feel that the Supreme Court has been hijacked and that it has become a political arm of government, instead of a strict defender of the Constitution."

Has this idiot been paying attention for the last 28 years? The Rehnquist court was not a liberally dominated court. Geez, Mafia Tony and Thomas have been there for a decade and a half!

This clueless jackass can't even get the facts straight enough to be convincing. He's upset simply because he's upset. There's no reason, no logic, and no facts to support it. He's obviously just another braindead conservative who is not happy unless he's angry.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. One of the best talking points I've ever heard, because it's so true:
"conservative who is not happy unless he's angry"

That's the mark of a real conservative. If they aren't angry, they have no purpose in life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. And, The Confusing Part To Me. . .
. . . is that they've got the presidency, the congress, the Supreme Court, their own media (even if they believe the "liberal media" nonsense, they've got Faux, WashTimes, and a number of mags), and they claim the country is moving right, and they claim THEY put Silverspoon in power. So, if all that's true, what is there to be so angry about?

It's the fact that proves my contention. There's nothing to be so angry about, but they're only happy if they're angry. So, they have to FIND something to drive the anger.

BTW: Thanks for the compliment.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. One of the more lucid freepers we've come across in the wild...
...and he's going Crazy over this Miers business.

and he's so right about this: "If she wasn’t the president’s friend, no one would know her name."

Who did until yesterday?

At least he owned up to this: "...the entire reason he was elected.
Conservatives wanted sanity in the courts. They elected him to put it there."

I'll start the pity party for him and his buddies now.

:nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. I believe that poster speaks what MOST Pubs are thinking now.
To varying degrees, I'm sure they're all pissed at him and DO feel betrayed! I've read several posts and heard several pundits say that the RW has worked hard for 3 decades to get to the position where they had total control and could reverse all the horrible decisions that were made during liberal control. They finally got there, and their chosen implementer instead shose to wimp out and forget them.

Although I disagree with their ideas, I can understand why they feel the way they do. You know WE would feel the same way f all our dreams were dashed by the one leader we were depending on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. While
her possible Dem past is interesting if she became a evangelical Christian after that I can assure you her brain has been hacked.
I grew up attending a evangelical Christian church and once they get you it's pretty difficult to clear your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. The only thing that's clear in that read
is the sheer hatred for Democrats and Liberals, IMHO.

It's displayed at the very beginning...she was a Democrat and gave directly to the Democratic Party. Oh My God! She must be evil!

It doesn't occur to the writer to celebrate and give credit to Bush for bringing her to his side of the ideological divide. Nope! All that matters is that she was a registered Democrat during the iconic reign of Ronald Reagan; that is unadulterated blasphemy.

The writer's obviously too blinded by this sheer hatred to see that this nominee is going to be FAR out of the 'mainstream conservativism' and probably even further to the right than the author!

Conservatives who voted for Bush really should have given more thought to the old adage, "Be careful what you wish for."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for the LInk
I have to say, that really starts to give me hope. She was a Democrat until booking up with GWB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Here's where I stopped reading or caring:
Very early on:

In a career that has spanned an era in which individual liberty has been repeatedly attacked by big government,

Bullshit. These people don't give a fuck about liberty and rights. If they did, they wouldn't support Bush and his fascist crap.

And, excuse me, but, they still have the nerve to complain about "big government"?

Fuck them.

They ARE the government now. And what are they doing? They are making it bigger, more powerful, and more inefficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Pretty good, but check this one out.
Especially the last line.
To: jimmygrace

"I think that W has learned from his mistakes, such as Charles Pickering. You won't get a self-proclaimed conservative past the likes of Specter, Chaffee, and Collins."

Listen RINO, it was probably people like you who convinced some PA conservatives to vote for Arlen Specter last year. Bush pledged his support in the primaries, and also in the election.

IF god-damned RINOs like you didn't help to push Specter over a principled conservative like Toomey, then obviously Bush wouldn't need to worry about Specter's support. It is these watered down compromises that will destroy the base.

Conservatives are not in love with big spending, and legislating from the bench. If Bush can't get the important things right, there will be a major fallout. For *MANY* people - ie. enough people to determine whether Republicans win or lose elections - judicial nomination is the *ONLY* reason they have stuck with the Party.

Bush is the unholy love child of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. God damned RINO tory.


37 posted on 10/04/2005 8:43:44 AM PDT by Frank T


Bush is the unholy love child of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. God damned RINO tory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone notice that this poster is incredibly literate for a Freepaholic.
The attacks against *'s choice of Miers are too well orchestrated not to evoke suspicions. It would be very simple to plant these outraged responses to Mier's appointment in the Freeper community, they can't think for themselves anyway. From what I've read, Miers is an evangelical, and she is privy to all of Bush's legal woes and conversations about Plamegate, Abu Ghraib, drunk driving charges, and who knows what else. He needs her there to save his ass from whatever is coming down the pike. I don't trust her appointment or the conservative response to it, on so many levels.

BTW isn't Harry Reid pro-life? What's up with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlas Mugged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Until the George W. Bush star began to rise..."
Oh, gag me with The Constitution.

Oh, wait, he already has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC