Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If final # in NOLA is 972, how do they explain this?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:21 PM
Original message
If final # in NOLA is 972, how do they explain this?
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 01:30 PM by babylonsister
St. Gabriel, LA: 02 October: 8,000 bodies taken to morgue:
http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051002/REPOSITORY/510020403/1037/NEWS04

snip
Cataldie, a former medical examiner, acknowledged that identifying and releasing bodies has been painfully slow. Of the nearly 8,000 bodies taken to the morgue, he said, just 32 have been identified positively and another 340 have been identified tentatively.

Because many bodies decomposed in heat and floodwaters after being left uncollected, Cataldie said, some victims never will be identified and their cause of death never known.

Forensic specialists supervised by the Federal Emergency Management Agency are taking X-rays and fingerprints of the corpses, but identifying bodies and notifying next-of-kin is being handled by state officials. Their greatest fear is misidentifying a corpse in the deluge of bodies. snip

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051002/REPOSITORY/510020403/1037/NEWS04

Edit to update links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent catch! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. We need more of this... we need more bodies found
We need more of these catches!

We need a large body count here. We need to have as many dead as possible and we need to get the word out about it. This is what will bring down the GOP. DeLay will get away with it.. Rove will get away with it... but with enough bodies, we can bring them down.

We can turn this so called "natural" disaster into our greatest victory ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Welcome to DU!
While I think I understand what you're saying...

I would never hope to depend on needing "as many dead as possible." As well, I and countless others think that the crimes and treasons this administration has committed are gravitas enough to bring these criminals down without our needing to rely on "enough bodies."

The disaster that was the response to Katrina is not a victory for anybody, not by any stretch of the imagination.

Dead is dead, and good Democrats do not on the dead rejoice or depend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Disgusting.
I'm just going to assume this is ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Far out, man!
We need more of these catches!
We need a large body count here. We need to have as many dead as possible and we need to get the word out about it. This is what will bring down the GOP. DeLay will get away with it.. Rove will get away with it... but with enough bodies, we can bring them down.
We can turn this so called "natural" disaster into our greatest victory ever.


Nice one! You can't do opacity, can you.

Okay, so which rightist site did you send the screenshot to? Or did you call Rush about it? Liddy?

"Look mommy! If I smear MY poop on Johnny's face, it makes it look like JOHNNY pooped himself, not me!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I heard on TV yesterday
That there are still 10,000 'officially missing', too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did they take the article down?
I can't get to it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That was weird; try here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wow
This is just unbelievable that this is happening in the Good Old USA. We have devolved past the Third World in the blink of an eye.
How will we ever get back to where we were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. This may be a better link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Has anyone stated that 972 is the FINAL number?
Your whole post is based on such a statement. Can you point me to that statement?..Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's currently the 'official' number
They say they are ending the search for bodies, and the official toll stands at 972 for New Orleans:

Here:
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/10/04/neworleans.bodies.ap/

...

The search for Katrina victims ended in Louisiana with a death toll substantially less than the 10,000 victims some officials feared.

The toll Tuesday stood at 972, eight more than Monday, the state health department said.

A private company has been hired by the state and will remove any other
bodies that are found.

...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's what they reported last night on the local news, as well...
How can they explain away the 7-9 semi convoy (refrigeration trucks) lined up outside a huge warehouse in Mississippi 3-4 days after Katrina? They interviewed the woman working at the temp. morgue and she assured the journalist that every body would be treated with the utmost respect. Others have seen the same broadcast...so I know that info is floating around out there. This is an outrage!

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Thanks for the link; I knew it was out there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Which doesn't mean its the final number. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Official = found and identified
who knows how many others are not yet identified, or will never be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. IMO, what's happening is the media is mis leading the viewers
confusing them. SURPRISE!.. (sorry, sarcasm absolutely Not directed at you)...

The media reports the recovery effort has concluded. Then they mention the number dead (which they don't clarify is only the "confirmed" dead), they don't mention the "other bodies" not identified, therefore not in the count.

That's what leads people to misunderstand this is not a "final" count. It's the finality of the recovery effort. The way they throw the number of dead in their report can lead some to conclude it's the final number, and they'll never be held responsible for "saying"/reporting that, because they didn't actually say it.

It's what they leave out and how they place the info they do provide, in the report. Not to mention, once there really is a final number, it will be on page 47 in two sentences in a small local paper somewhere in, I don't know, find a place you never heard of, that should about where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. They've stopped searches
Here's a news story from today. The death toll is now 972 in LA. They've stopped searching in New Orleans, but the number could still change if people call with reports.

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-13447055,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps
...do you remember a story that came out about a week after Katrina hit that someone saw that body counters were attributing only about 20% of the deaths to Katrina...the rest were from "natural" causes.

If someone died from diabetic shock, or dehydration, or from an illness they had been managing successfully pre-Katrina, it may be that they are not being counted in the Katrina totals.

This story appeared briefly then disappeared without a trace since.

Using those percentages, the death total from all direct and indirect Katrina causes might be closer to 5000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Yep. 900 dead from Katrina, 9,000 dead from levee break.
Obviously, NOLA missed the bullet where Katrina was concerned! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Its simple..they don't count the Black bodies. Hell, they never counted
them when they were alive, why should they start now! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Bingo!
I was just about to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. It is sad just how true that it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Typo...
Same article, same reporters stright to the LA Timaes and it says 800.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/latimests/20050929/ts_latimes/katrinascorpsesaremanyidsarefew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Ah, good catch!
I still believe that the real count is MUCH higher. Thousands of children were missing. Two year olds named "Megan" and "Emily" and "Aisha" with no surviving photos of them. So have they all been accounted for? It's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah, I read that yesterday... It doesn't make sense...
How can they say the death toll is only 900 some, when they have 8000 bodies at the morgue?! Insane...

I think this needs to go to KO and CNN...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Im with Rosey Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. I sent article to KO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great find - recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. How many more were killed in Mississippi and Alabama?
and the rest of LA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kicked, nommed and bookmarked!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzsaw_23 Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. nominated-kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. edited to 800 in this copy of same story
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 01:54 PM by riverwalker
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051002/NEWS06/510020487/1012/NEWS06

"By DAVID ZUCCHINO and NICHOLAS RICCARDI
Los Angeles Times" These guys need to clarify this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yeah, I don't get it... the OP link says 8000,
These two other links, yahoo/indy edit number to 800??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. very weird n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. That's what generally happens in the event of a typo...
...on a web article. It's annoying that they don't issue proper corrections for mistakes like that.

OTOH, you could check the print additions (I believe it's LA Times) to see if a print correction was issued for the print version of the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. frankly, 800 makes more sense
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 02:27 PM by onenote
(i) Hard to hide 8000 bodies -- someone would've noticed
(ii)Unlikely that after all this time they would have only identified 340 of 8000 bodies

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. Just sent this to Keith Olbermann
Now I'll send it to AAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. it's weird to me that with the Tsunami
there were death tolls that kept rising over the first few days, and yet the Gulf/NOLA didn't have similar estimates over a similar time frame.

Plus when you know they are gagging the press - you have to be suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Of course this might include bodies that were released from graveyards
during the storm....but good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. How can they be allowed to get away with this???
This is ridiculous.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. glad you posted this as a thread.
we have a right and need to know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Me, too. I knew I had read otherwise, and once I
googled St. Gabriel in BR, I found it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. The number of MISSING seems to never get discussed though.
One would think many or most of those still missing after a month are likely dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. And where's a master list,
like there was for 9/11? It's infuriating that this isn't being done and advertised widely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
39. LA Times - 800 not 8000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
preciousdove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I know 800 is the misprint..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
41. Morticians had been told to expect up to 40,000 bodies:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrathofkahn Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
43. One other thing to remember in this...
There will be a significant number of bodies found that were long dead before this hurricane hit. Remember, they have to bury their dead above ground there, and when there is significant flooding in other bayou areas outside of New Orleans, it's not uncommon for some bodies to float out of the mausoleums. When my wife was growing up in Freshwater City Bayou, LA (go ahead, try to find it on map; good luck), this was basically expected.

In a city the size of New Orleans, and with the level of flooding that occurred there, I wouldn't be surprised if there were lots and lots of bodies that came out of those impressive cemeteries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. There a big difference between skeletal remains
which most of the bodies in the graveyards are at this point and dead bodies.

Besides from the reports that I've read most of the cemeteries survived the storm and the flood pretty much in tact. They did not ended up with remains all over the place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrathofkahn Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Interesting
I hadn't heard anything specific about the New Orleans cemeteries, but when my wife went to her home on the AL/MS border, where they bury in the same way, there was quite a bit of loss of bodies there.

Agreed about the skeletal remains, but people certainly would have been people "buried" recently before the storm, as well. My wife says that the most recently "buried" are always the ones to "float" out first, presumably because they're more buoyant than just a bunch of bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. It Is A Mis-Print, Ma'am
By a small-town paper. The original L.A. Times article, copied by the Concord paper, states "800 bodies", not eight thousand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Ms babylongsister is not guilty of inflating it
A bad editor is.

A beer for anybody who can tell me what's wrong with the Subject line from an editorial point of view.

(Hint: drop one word to change the meeting, and suggest an alternate construction).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC