Each of the five NTSB Board members serve for five years with a mix of Democrats and Republicans. The Chairman is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for a two year term. Bush has nominated Ellen Engleman Conners to serve a second term as chairman(person). Her first term expired March 2005. The White House website shows her nomination as pending. The process is supposed to start with the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, but there is no mention of her or the NTSB on their site. In the mean time, Vice Chairman Rosenker (the Vice Chair is not subject to Senate approval) is the acting Chairman.
There have been problems at NTSB for a few years:
NTSB Chair Criticized by Colleagues
St. Petersburg Times 9/20/04
Three members of the National Transportation Safety Board are unhappy with Chairwoman Ellen Engleman Conners for managing the watchdog agency with a heavy hand.
The board members have sent her a letter that indicates she has restricted their travel, blocked their hiring and tried to limit their conversations with NTSB staff and the news media. She has even suggested what clothes they should wear to board meetings.
The three members - Carol Carmody, Richard Healing and Deborah Hersman - wrote 31/2 pages of complaints. They said they wanted to hire their own staff, as NTSB members have in the past. They want to be able to speak with the news media because, under the NTSB's policies, "no board member is precluded from responding to a request for an interview." And they asked for complete freedom to talk with investigators and other NTSB staffers.
<snip>
Engleman Conners, formerly with the U.S. Department of Transportation, was appointed to the safety board by President Bush. In her outer office, she prominently displays large photographs of Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. That raised eyebrows among some safety board officials because the agency is supposed to be independent so it can criticize the administration if necessary.
Link:
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/09/17/Worldandnation/NTSB_chair_criticized.shtmlTransportation safety board in turmoil
GovExec.com 7/29/05
In his final public appearance as a member of the National Transportation Safety Board, Richard Healing put his inner engineer on display.
<snip>
Healing's last day at the board was July 29, a year and a half before his term expires. His resignation leaves the board -- which investigates the causes of most major aviation, rail, marine, and other transportation accidents -- without a member who has a background in engineering or aviation. The lack of such expertise worries transportation safety advocates, who fear that the NTSB's effectiveness will drop. Healing's departure also comes amid some internal turmoil at the board that has employee representatives warning that morale has sunk to a new low.
<snip>
Worries about the lack of engineering or aviation experience began to bubble up when John Goglia, an engineer who held an FAA aircraft mechanic's certificate, resigned from the board last year. Goglia expressed concern that only one member, Healing, remained with an engineering background. Healing is a licensed professional engineer who worked on aviation safety issues for the Navy before his NTSB appointment. "Most of the accidents -- probably all of them -- involve technical issues," Goglia said.
Goglia pointed out a line in the law governing NTSB's operations that says, "At least three members shall be appointed on the basis of technical qualification, professional standing, and demonstrated knowledge in accident reconstruction, safety engineering, human factors, transportation safety, or transportation regulation."
<snip>
Despite the controversies, transportation accident rates are at all-time lows. A major commercial airline crash hasn't occurred in three years. That may, in part, explain why the NTSB is issuing fewer recommendations than at any time since 1970. In addition, NTSB spokeswoman Peduzzi said that the board has changed its recommendations' philosophy. "We are now focusing on issuing the 'must-have' recommendations, rather than the 'nice to have,' " Peduzzi said.
Still, some worry about that approach. Goglia, the former member, said he's concerned that a political desire to show safety improvements is driving the reduction in new recommendations. An outside aviation safety expert, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he thought that the reductions were designed "not necessarily to improve safety, but just to get the numbers down."
Link:
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0705/072905nj1.htm