Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you now, or have you ever been, a journalist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 08:35 AM
Original message
Are you now, or have you ever been, a journalist?
This great quote is from a review of "Good Night, and Good Luck"

That's what Good Night, and Good Luck. feels like, a smooth, sardonic smack in the face of today's so-called newspeople, the cinematic equivalent of a withering glare and a disdainful roll of the eyes. Oh, this is an angry movie, calm and collected on the surface and seethed with reeled-in rage underneath. Yeah, it's about Edward R. Murrow and how he took on McCarthy's insanity, but what it's really about is how we need a Murrow now and is there no one, not one supposed journalist, with the balls to take up Murrow's mantle of integrity and honesty and fearlessness?

(Yes, as a matter of fact there is a period at the end of the film's title. And you know what? This flick is so damn perfect that I've got no problem forgiving that kind of nonsense.)

What's brilliant about Good Night isn't that it ends up sorta serving the very purpose it's angry that no one else is serving, or that it agrees with my own politics, but that it's so damn cool. For all its anger, there's no ranting and raving, no speechifying, no histrionics or grandiose dramatics. It's like, Look, this is what really happened, and the facts don't need any embellishments or frills to highlight how damn relevant they are to what's going on today. The only overt commentary comes in the bits that bookend the film, in which Murrow, in a speech to a 1958 gathering of network execs, condemns the deplorable state of TV and wonders how America 50 years later will look back at the time, as to suggest that things would be so much better in the futuristic 21st century and they all should be ashamed of themselves in the unenlightened 1950s. That's the film's cool, sardonic humor: the irony in the idea that our TV today should be smarter and more sophisticated, when of course the only thing we've done "better" is expand the depths of inanity to which mass entertainment can descend.

http://www.flickfilosopher.com/flickfilos/archive/2005/goodnightgoodluck.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good review, thank you!
Actually, I thought you actually asking the question, so I was prepared with my answer, LOL! But this is far more interesting...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC