Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do you guys debunk this right wing talking point on Plame?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:16 PM
Original message
How do you guys debunk this right wing talking point on Plame?
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 PM by nickshepDEM
I hear a lot of Republicans who try to cover up her being outed by saying she was not 'undercover' or 'covert' at the time of the outing. Therefore no one broke the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Identities_Protection_Act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. The CIA would not have asked...
for an investigation unless she was "outed". Also, just because she was not "covert" at the time does not mean when her identity was revealed it did not compromise other covert agents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Valarie Plame's covert operation was revealed.
That is the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Good point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. That is right
Whether justified or not, Plame's identity was, indeed, a secret. And it was not for political appointees to second-gues the CIA about that. And BTW, it was justified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. The CIA said she was covert. Thats enough proof for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Yeppers
And it should been enough for Karl and Scooter -- that is, had they not been traitors at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. She WAS covert at the time.
Fact. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:20 PM
Original message
Bring up the fact that by outing her, other agents are compromised as well
You may also want to mention that these are just media predections as to what exact charges Fitz is bringing, and to what statutes he is using, and what facts he is using.

Intelligence Identities Protection Act is but one act- there are many Espinage laws that were psooibly broken...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Does anyone know if 'Fitz' is a Dem. or Rep?
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 PM by nickshepDEM
They're using the fact that Earle is a Dem to discredit his case against Delay. They'll probably call this a 'witch hunt' too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. He's a Republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. I read that he is not registered as either Dem or Republican
I read that he was registered as Independent at one time until he found out that in the area where he registered, being Independent was a party affiliation so he is no longer registered that way. Supposedly he is not registered under any party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Also, the human assets (locals) she and the other agents interacted with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. How about non-asset locals who merely interacted with her?
Waiters, cabbies, maids, etc.

I wouldn't like to have been a waiter in her favorite restaurant in Damascus or Karachi or ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Simple remind them that this is
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:21 PM by malaise
about treason - lying about WMDs and leading the country into an illegal war. Read Justin's latest article.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2145445

edit -add link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. she was the bravest and most covert of agents, traveling and building
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:29 PM by AZDemDist6
her cover company (with the CIA's help) with no diplomatic or Agency cover under her own passport

she was DEEP cover, an independant actor putting her life on the line without the Agency's protection

she was a real deal spy.

do a bit more research on her company, you'll see!

http://www.apfn.org/LEAK-GATE/CIA_firm.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. That is a fact. Stupid freepers confuse "no cover" ...
with not covert. They are simply a bunch of dumb fucks. "No cover" means highly covert and more risk for the agents.

Of course, republicans who know better will fertilize and propagate the freeper confusion, knowing their idiot supporters for the stupid asses they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. E.Z.

* The CIA were the ones who brought the charges.
* They know who is an agent and deserves cover
* Plame was working to protect all Americans from real WMDs
* Brewster Jennings (her front company) cost millions of $s
to build .... it is now gone.
* It was an act of treason against all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Republicans obviously condone breaching our national security!
The GOP will spin anything and they haven't a leg to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did you omit a "not" before 'undercover'?
Or am I misunderstanding it...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Whooops. Fixed.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Then why did they name her?
Why perform such an act if weren't meant to be harmful?

Why would they want to be harmful to the Wilson's? If you believe the rightwing, Joe Wilson just a liar and a partisan. Why would you need to attack someone that was not a threat if everything they say is true?

It was retribution for exposing their Niger-Iraq lie.

You only attack threats to the truth and Joe Wilson was a threat to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. A great site for debunking repuke Plame talking points...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DelawareValleyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. If the outing were not criminal
the investigation would have been wrapped up long ago. Also, there would have been no need to jail Miller. Her testimony would not be needed to ascertain Plame's covert status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. State Dept memo on Air Force One indicated she had top secret status
The State Dept memo that White House officials reviewed on Air Force One (before her identity being leaked) clearly indicated that the information about her status as a CIA agent was classified secret info that was not to be shared.

Many news sources have reported this fact which the RWingers choose to conveniently ignore. Here is link to CNN story. All the other major media outlets had similar articles.

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A classified State Department memorandum that has been the subject of questioning in a federal leak probe identifies a CIA agent by name in a paragraph marked "S" for secret, sources told CNN Thursday."

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/21/cia.leak/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. The CIA disagrees with them.
They are in a position to actually know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Assuming no one she ever worked with is still uncover.
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 08:33 PM by parasim
It's not the just the outing of Plame, it's all of her contacts, etc., many of whom are likely still covert.

On edit: Of course, I have no idea if that does or does not violate the Intelligent Identities Protection Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. She had a very deep cover. She was an NOC. That meant that she
was willing to die for her country if it was discovered that she was a spy. NOCs do not carry diplomatic passports in case they get caught, and many countries will execute spies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. She was a NOC.
Non-Official Cover. If her operations get exposed, Uncle Sam never heard of her.

Here's a nice backgrounder, from Larry Johnson, ex-CIA:

http://www.counterpunch.org/johnson10072005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I truely believe that there are many RWingers who...
pu their party above America. They are the actual anti-American traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. Debunk it with FACT;
YES, in fact, she WAS covert at the time she was outed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCat Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. What does the law say?
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 01:48 AM by AlphaCat
I think we need to concentrate on the criteria against which their behavior is measured. I'd like to see a clear list of their actual behavior, and a list of exactly what the legal standard for behavior is, in this regard--and THEN a comparison. It is only in this way that I think we can walk into a court of law (or the media can publish a credible account) and truly 'take it to the people'.

We need to get the public behind this--LEGAL things they can understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC