story than what I just read in that Buzzflash alert, or in the LA Times story (
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-profile6oct06,0,6078046,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines ) that I found a link for in some comments on this at
http://taxprof.typepad.com/ , where the Buzzflash alert was also mentioned (I finally found that page by using the name of the fishing club to search, after seeing your message about it).
Miers didn't help get Bush those tax breaks, but reportedly helped settle a lawsuit brought by a former caretaker at the Rainbo Club, who alleged that Bush and other members of the club had unjustly fired him out of "spite and ill will." Fineman's comments seem to allude to this, in his reference to run-ins with employees and locals. I haven't found anything yet on the details of the case, but Moseley apparently had sufficient enough grounds for the lawsuit that the other members of the Rainbo Club opted for confidential settlements with him. Reportedly Miers, as Bush's lawyer, opted to fight, and she got the complaint against Bush dismissed, so there was no "awkward publicity." But wouldn't a confidential settlement also have avoided all "awkward publicity"?
According to an archived Washington Post story at
http://lobby.la.psu.edu/083_Class_Action_Reform/News_Stories/Newspaper/Washington_Post_021000.htm , it took almost two years to get the case dismissed. To me, that suggests that Bush's fighting the charge against him had more to do with how potentially damaging losing the case (or admitting guilt in a confidential settlement) would be. If they were simply worried about that tax break becoming public knowledge as a sidelight of the case, some incidental background on it, I'd think that extended legal battles would be the last thing they'd want. Fineman's referring to employees and locals, too -- plural -- so unless that column was sloppily written and he'd misremembered a lawsuit brought by one former caretaker as an incident involving a number of people, there's more to this story -- enough to have left Bush very grateful to Miers for making this problem go away.
By the way, Bush's tax savings on that property, because of the loophole, amounted to about $500 a year, according to a story in the Amarillo Globe-News in 1999, when the tax savings came to light. This wasn't a huge story, and it just doesn't seem like anything that would be worth two years of legal maneuvers, or that would explain Bush finding Miers so important after she took care of this for him.