Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even though Bush is not "Pro-Life" per se, he wants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:55 AM
Original message
Even though Bush is not "Pro-Life" per se, he wants
Pro-Lifers off of his back, right?

This is one of the functions of the Miers nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Problem is that the pro-lifers aren't happy with Miers.
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 11:00 AM by Zynx
Maybe the higher-ups are, but the rank and file are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe they don't get it.
Or maybe I don't.

Is there any way she can possibly fail Bush in this mission? - possibly due to the incongruence of her experience level compared to the SCOTUS justices she will have to go against on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think she has the intellectual clout to resist other opinions on
the court. She will become a pawn of one side or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. In the same mode as her patron, she won't have to deal
with the intellectual environment of the court; she will simply have to vote "Pro-Life" without any intellectual effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. That is, of course, if she is pro-life. She seems to adopt positions as
they suit her rather than forming any true beliefs. Lord knows how she actually feels about anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. she's a rabid anti abortion activist. I don't get their objections
there is something here that doesn't add up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There are more than just "Pro-Lifers" with legal skin in this game.
Bush himself probably doesn't give a darn how Roe v. Wade turns out, except in as much as he has to make good for his party by paying off his debt to the so-called Christian RW.

Bush does care about his legacy, read that, his effect upon the War Powers Act.

So the question is who else around him has issues that outweigh Roe v. Wade and what will be her effect upon them.

Of course, we don't know the answers to any of this, because everything about this administration is Classified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. And the RW doesn't really want to "trust" Bush anymore. He isn't a
fiscal conservative, and they are wondering on what other platforms they have been lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bush is establishing his own "Private Law" and Cheney established
his own "Private Intelligence". The entire financial apparatus is under pressure, so it will do what it needs to survive. Now the other conservatives have to figure out just how essential they are to that $urvival. And it's beginning to take more than Rove's BuShit to be a participant in that particular game. Multi-national corporations do not say the, or any, Pledge of Allegiance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattim Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. More and more pro-lifers think that he's only stringing them along.
The duller ones think that he lacks the courage to appoint a pro-lifer.
The sharper ones realize that he won't overturn Roe vs Wade, because then the pro-lifers would have no reason to hitch themselves to the Republican cart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hi pattim!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC