Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"GM Crop 'Ruins Fields for 15 Years'"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:39 PM
Original message
"GM Crop 'Ruins Fields for 15 Years'"
GM crops contaminate the countryside for up to 15 years after they have been harvested, startling new government research shows.

The findings cast a cloud over the prospects of growing the modified crops in Britain, suggesting that farmers who try them out for one season will find fields blighted for a decade and a half.

Financed by GM companies and Margaret Beckett's Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the report effectively torpedoes the Government's strategy for introducing GM oilseed rape to this country.

Ministers have stipulated that the crops should not be grown until rules are worked out to enable them to "co-exist" with conventional ones. But the research shows that this is effectively impossible.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1009-04.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good Luck to all these
farmers who DO NOT want their crops "contaminated" by genitically modified organisms.

I've known Organic Farmers for 20 years who are fighting this Scourge.

And I know there are DUers who think it's harmless but I say it's very harmful and I don't want my crops to tainted with mansanto seeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I am working on a No GM Trespass sign.
I have not yet figured the wording, but here is my best so far.

Posted No Genetic Trespassing
The entry of genetically or otherwise biologically tagged, patented, modified or otherwise owned plant or animal genetics is forbidden entry unless the land owner is informed and consents to the entry. Any violation will be considered criminal trespass. All damage to original or natural genomes on this property is property destruction. Individuals or companies responsible for not securing genetic property will be responsible for all loss of property, income and potential income caused by trespass of genetic information or material.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am so hoping that Europe keeps a relatively
closed door to GM crops!

This sounds encouraging
Last night Pete Riley, the director of GM Freeze, said; "It is becoming clearer and clearer that it is going to be impossible to grow GM crops in Britain."

DemEx



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Lucky you, guys! Way
ahead of the USA. Poor USA is getting left in the lurch due to insane greed by corporatemeisters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. nominated n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. When I lived in farm country several years ago this was
the topic of conversation. The dangerous GM seeds were blowing into their fields and contaminating their crops, and DoA regs protected the offenders from redress by their neighbors.
It's just another in the seemingly endless list of ways our country is going down the crapper.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. UM, a little confused here.
I read the article, but it seems like jargon to me. What exactly is GM Oilseed Rape? Is it a type of seed? A type of crop? What the seed does to other crops? What is the purpose of trying it to begin with? Do these seeds produce more crops?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You probably know it as Canola Oil
Canola is the common trade name for rape seed oil. The GM means it's genetically modified under a patent.

If the winds blow it into an unsuspecting neighbor's field and pollinates his crops (which the neighbor has absolutely no way to prevent), the neighbor no longer owns his own harvest because he doesn't own the rights to the patent, and he can't legally save the new seeds to replant the following year, as farmers often do to save money.

The neighbors choices become either pay the company for the use of their (unwanted) product or dispose of the entire harvest - for as many years as his crops are contaminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Utter bullsh*t. How can I violate the patent rights of another due
to a bird crapping a seed onto my land? If that's the case Mosanto should be (probably is) contaminating everyone's field right now, under cover of darkness.

Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, if they won't allow it's use, they should have to come and ...
claim each "weed" of theirs and till their neighbor's contaminated fields in recompense then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thanks for the clarification btw nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. I found another article, and now I'm more confused
http://tinyurl.com/a6c2x

EUROPA Press Release Brussels, 31 August 2005

GMOs: Commission authorises import of GM-oilseed rape for use in animal feed

The European Commission authorised today the placing on the market of the genetically modified oilseed rape known as GT73 for import and processing. This decision is valid for 10 years and results from an application submitted by the company Monsanto. The GT73 oilseed rape, which is tolerant to the herbicide glyphosate, is already widely used in North America with no reports of any adverse effects on health or the environment. The authorisation today, which is backed by science, covers the specific use for imports of the GM oilseed rape and processing for use in animal feed or for industrial purposes. The authorisation is complemented by a Recommendation concerning the measures to be taken by the consent holder to prevent any damage to health and the environment in the event of the accidental spillage of GT73. Refined oil derived from GT73 oilseed rape has already been approved for food use in 1997 in the EU.

The GT73 oilseed rape has been subject to a rigorous pre-market risk assessment. It has been scientifically assessed by the European Food Safety Authority as being as safe as any conventional oilseed rape. Clear labelling provides farmers and consumers with the information they need to decide whether to buy the product or not. And robust post-marketing rules will ensure that the product can be traced and monitored when put on the market.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC