Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the "leaks" about Plamegate/Treasongate are managed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:20 PM
Original message
I think the "leaks" about Plamegate/Treasongate are managed
I think they are calculated. I think they are factoring in this aspect of the case. I am so glad that they are doing this way too. Anyone else see this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure. Nobody is "leaking" anything contrary to self interest
That's why I don't participate in the speculation.

Only one person knows what's going on. That's Fitzgerald. And to his credit, he and his people are saying shit.

I'm perfectly happy waiting until the results are announced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKDem08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't you think that would open Fitz
to accusations of politicizing the process?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's not him, or his people. It's not really "leaks"
but off the record commentary from witnesses, targets, their lawyers, and professional rumorsmiths. Leaks imply it's from a source that is under an obligation to keep it confidential. I think it's all from sources under no obligation but would rather not let their names out, because they have an agenda that would discredit their leaks.

Heck, if thought any of this stuff was actually coming out of Fitzgerald's office, I'd pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. there are no "leaks" from the grand jury
or fitz`s office. there are only speculations,theories,and lawyers posturing for their clients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fitz better not leak, as he is examining a case involving leaked
information!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nobody leaks more than a Republican.
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC