Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stephanopoulos: Source Says Bush & Cheney Involved in Plamegate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:21 PM
Original message
Stephanopoulos: Source Says Bush & Cheney Involved in Plamegate
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 10:22 PM by Samantha
I feel sure this must have been discussed here and I simply missed it. If so, I apologize. However, in the event this has been overlooked (I can't imagine it) or if you too missed it, you will want to review Stephanopoulos' assertion Sunday on "This Week:"

"Definitely a political problem but I wonder, George Will, do you think it’s a manageable one for the White House especially if we don’t know whether Fitzgerald is going to write a report or have indictments but if he is able to show as a source close to this told me this week, that President Bush and Vice President Cheney were actually involved in some of these discussions."

This site references the above quote and contains the video of Stephanopoulos uttering this assertion to George Will. I personally thought it was bombshell.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/10/02.html#a5192

I can't host this thread tonight, but I wanted to be sure this information had been disseminated here. What I don't understand is this: did not the fact that Stephanopoulos made this statement tacitly extend an invitation to be subpoenaed by Fitzgerald? Would not Fitzgerald want to ask Stephanopoulos under oath who exactly was his source "close to the investigation?"

Is it not obvious that a confidant giving Stephanopoulos this information must be so determined to have the the Bush, Cheney involvement be made public that he was willing to crawl out on a political limb despite the recent Miller incarceration?

Please post your comments here and keep this thread kicked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. The source could be from the Fitzgerald camp....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. He won't go after steph. He will after leaks regarding national security
Steph is just being a news person, for a change. Let him go with it. It's good practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I asked an attorney this question today
His response was Fitzgerald probably already had the information ....

I don't usually talk politics with people at work, and I was surprised at the relatively low-keyed manner in which he just simply said this.

I personally think this was a huge statement for George to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Listening just to the words
it seems quite possible that they discussed the Wilson issue as in, "D*ck, what do you know about this Joe W*lson thing?" "Gee, Mr. President, I know people are talking about it, but it's nothing to worry about. Sc*oter has it covered. Now moving on..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. An interesting angle ....
Georgie could be called regarding leaks if they become an issue with the defendents, the GJ or the judge ...

We shall see ....

What is of GREATER import: Bush involved ? ... Cheney as well ? ..

SURELY we have all read the rawstory tidbit the last 30 or so hours, but there was no mention of Bush and scant mention of Cheney ....

I of course believe that ALL of them planned this despicable act, and that all had motive and ability ......

Bush and Cheney: Handcuffed and Frog Marched .....

Cristo couldnt dream up a crazier display ...

But what a joy it would be ..... and none deserve it more ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's extremely difficult believe Bush* had no prior knowledge of this
But we seldom even see any speculation on this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. CM (corporate media) is afraid to ask the obvious question, "What
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 11:05 PM by autorank
did he know, and when did he know it?"

Well, we're not. Damn, he sure as hell knew. He and Karl share political pillow talk every day. Can you just imagine how nasty and bitter their conversations are. Too bad the taping system is gone (or is it). The religious supporters would get an ear full of that one.

Of course, the enemies list is easy, just look at the census role for United States of America! They hate all of us, every single one.

Swamp Rat sums it up:



On edit: It just occurred to me that Bush wouldn't be in this situation if it hadn't been for folks like us who are disparaged as extremists and conspiracy theorists.

Well, we've prevailed over the "coincidence theorists" haven't we!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hell, I think it was Bush's idea to do it. The whole thing just reeks of
his brand of petty vindictiveness and spite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I think you are correct, but it also sounds like a classic Rove
maneuver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think the lack of speculation about Bush is due to the fact that
the media and the entire American public realizes that Bush is too stupid to be Pres. and he is not his own man and without even realizing what we are doing it - we give him a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's the whole purpose of that
It's all an act so people would say "Bush really couldn't be involved in that, he's too stupid" but I don't buy it. He was talking about invading Iraq since 1999 and remember what Richard Clarke told "Meet the Press" as well. That Bush was wanting information about Iraq and nothing else with 9/11. This also showed me that they were in on 9/11 as well and more evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I think it's probably true
I don't buy this Bush isn't involved nonsense. I think he's been in the know since the beginning. He may not have done anything but he was in the know. They don't call Rove Bush's brain for nothing. And Bush was there on the Niger trip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep, its made the rounds, but how many times is too many times in this war
Lest we forget, lest we lose a micron of the motivation, patriotism, independance that got us all caught up in this crime drama to start with...

They're all in it. No surprised, innocent president is going to come out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gee, if Fitzgerald were to subpoena Bush
do you think Bush would be able to bring Cheney in with him for the questioning and that everything would be off the record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Throw the fuckin' traitors in jail !
RULE OF LAW !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Of COURSE they are.. Underlings, no matter HOW powerful they
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 01:14 AM by SoCalDem
think they are, do NOT do things like this on their own.. They are directed to do it, coerced to do it, or they just take the BLAME for it when Bush/Cheney do it

Bush and Cheney are vindictive, vile people who stop at NOTHING when they have a chance to discredit their "supposed" enemies.. They play for keeps, and nothing is ruled out of bounds..

Remember when Cheney and Scooter practically LIVED at the CIA in the lead-up time before the war?? NO OTHER Vice president had EVER done that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'm going to guess they will be unindicted co-conspirators, at best
Just don't think he'll indict the pres and vp. The GJ has to indict, and they probably wouldn't do it.

I don't want them to resign. I want them unable to do any harm. The last thing we need are two new pubs in office there.


http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I happened to read a small item today on Watergate
that talked about Jaworski (can't remember for sure how that is spelled) pondered whether a president could be indicted. He came to the conclusion he probably could not; if he (Jaworski) went so far as to try to do so, it would create a Constitutional crisis, the likes of which we had never seen.

Think about it. What if the president were indicted and an arrest attempt were made. Could he not call out the Secret Service (or the military) to protect him?

Jaworski figured out the best route to go was the safe Constitutional one. He was relieved that the Republicans agreed to send a delegation to speak to Nixon, and to let him know the votes for impeachment were there. Save the country from an impeachment ordeal -- simply resign.

People are fond of saying Bush* could never be impeached since both the Senate and the House are controlled by the Republicans. I don't believe this is true. If Bush*s numbers and reputation are so damaged, support for him could endanger 2006 election results, those up for re-election will throw him over so fast, it will be dubbed a pre-emptive reelection strike executed so quickly it shocked and awed both Bush* and Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well thankyou Stephenopoulus!!!....Duh, who woulda thunk it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. This came out today on other sources that Cheney & Bush
sat in on the meetings. Now all it takes is a person at that meeting to break from the pack!!! I'm betting on Powell!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Well deeeuuuuuya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC