Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Bloomberg Extends Lead in NYC Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IN-dem Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 02:18 AM
Original message
Poll: Bloomberg Extends Lead in NYC Race
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 04:18 PM by Skinner
By SARA KUGLER, Associated Press Writer
Wed Oct 12,11:25 PM ET



NEW YORK - Mayor Michael Bloomberg, elected in 2001 to succeed Rudolph Giuliani as fires still raged in the World Trade Center ruins, has taken a commanding lead over his Democratic challenger, at least in part because of his handling last week of an alleged terrorist plot to bomb the subways.

Two new polls indicate the mayor's response to the terror threat helped him nearly double his lead over Fernando Ferrer. And an overwhelming majority of voters said they believe Bloomberg is stronger on security than his opponent.

A Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday showed Bloomberg with a 28-point lead over Ferrer, 60 percent to 32 percent, among likely voters. The survey was being conducted last week when the mayor appeared with the police commissioner and FBI officials to announce the potential al-Qaida attack and a tightening of subway security.

"At this stage of the game it's an absolute blowout, partly because of the terrorist threats to the subway and the way he acted like a commander in chief," said Maurice Carroll, director of the polling institute at Quinnipiac.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT

___http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051013/ap_on_el_st_lo/nyc_mayor_poll;_

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, why don't the NY Dems have a stronger candidate? Bloomberg looks
vulnerable to me. There seems to be a consensus that this whole subway bomber plot was a hoax, and the Mayor fell for it without thinking the thing through.

What's wrong with my hometown? You used to be the smartest bunch, now you're just a bunch of Kool-Aid drinkers.

This is pathetic. :( :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. NY bloggers agree with you.
I also read that the polls were conducted before the hoax was actually confirmed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So, what's with AP running this item now? Is this more evidence of
that wire service's fall into Murdochism? Very deceptive spin on that ball. I'm going to file this one away as an Exhibit.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I suspect it's that "rule of journalism" crap.
CNN confirmed only yesterday that it was a hoax. Until the MSM print editors see a change in Bloomberg's numbers (meaning that someone will have to commi$$ion a new poll), these numbers will stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How does he look vulnerable? I could have predicted three years
ago when his approval was forty percent that he would have a landslide win over any opponent. Things are going well in NY. And Bloomberg is very down to earth and likable. He is without pretensions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "Things are going well in NY" What industry do you work in?
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 06:35 AM by leveymg
Bloomberg comes across as a little, whiney-voiced prig. He's annoying, and lacks Giuliani's presence, Koch's sense of humor, Lindsay's mystique, and LaGuardia's populism.

He's living off of the fading benefits of several decades of gentification. Bloomberg's a semi-colon in the great history of the city. New York needs better than him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I couldn't have said it better.
His paternalistic, "I-know-what's-best-for-you" pompous attitude is insulting.

I just want to know why the Democratic Party can't come up with a decent candidate for mayor - they are all such losers. You would think that a city like this would be teeming with qualified candidates that could WIN! How can such a vital city produce such charisma-impaired candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Weiner was interesting
And he would have probably had a shot if he was the front runner from the start. That's why he finished second after being last for months. Weiner would have given people something to vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I know - Ferrer still had momentum from the last election.
I would have chosen Weiner as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. NY is not full of koolaid drinkers.
Kerry won NYC with 75%. The problem with your hometown is that you don't know anything about it. Bloomberg has done a decent job and Ferrer sucks. Now, explain to me why Kerry got 75% and Ferrer is getting around 35%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Blomberg won already
the Dem is way too weak a candidate, I could beat him, it's been one screw up after another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Just goes to prove how fake terra-lerts can get them numbers up n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. It has nothing to do with that.
People aren't afraid here. They voter rolls are 5-1 Democratic. Bloomberg is very likable and Ferrer sucks. The city has been at relative peace since he took over. The budget is back under control and Bloomberg has been actively working on education which is a major issue in NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. But after watching and hearing him in action last week it became very...
...apparent that he is a nasally talking slime bag. Can't New Yorkers see that? Maybe after Rudy he looks pretty good? I don't know? It was pretty obvious here in Illinois that Bloomers is a worm though. Really.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. How many people even saw that?
It lasted for a day or two and most people I know didn't take it seriously. There wasn't a reason to tune in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. In-dem:
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs and must include a link to the original source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ferrer is such a loser. And I told everyone that would listen.
But NY Dems were too dumb to see it. Then again, 60% voted against Ferrer. Ferrer is a know nothing, do nothing, say anything loser. Is he better than Bloomberg? I am not convinced. And yes, I know he gave 7-8 million to pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Is Ferrer as big of a big Bush suckass as Bloomberg obviously is?
If he isn't as a Democratic voter that would be good enough for me.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. IN-dem please read
In the future please limit your snips of articles to 4
paragraphs as per the Democratic Underground copyright
rules .

proud patriot
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. You mean, "at least in part because of his handling of the hoax"?
Ye gods. One of the strongholds of American progressivism, with a 6-1 Dem edge in registration, is staring down the barrel of a fourth consecutive repuke term. My own Mom, she who carried my eight-year-old self on her shoulders to a McGovern rally in '72, is preparing to vote repuke. :puke: Bloomie ain't no RINO, either, not as long as he keeps dropping a quarter mill here and there on the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. He did a great job didn't he? We wonder why we keep getting screwed
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 02:17 PM by NNN0LHI
After reading this story and with a 6-1 Dem registration in NYC we might just be better off infiltrating the Republicans and try and change that party from within? We are never going to change anything if the Dem's can't figure out how to win elections even when they have a 6 to 1 advantage in voters. Thats not too hard to figure out.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC