The difference between Patrick Fitzgerald and Kenneth Starr:

[Catherine Vincent]

No hand and ankle cuffs!


Hand and ankle cuffs!

Now tell me ladies and gentlemen, which was worse? Being involved with the POTUS about a failed land deal worth about $200,000 before said president was in office or being a party to a treasonous corrupt administration that blew the cover of a CIA agent?

caveat - Ms. Miller may have been in cuffs, the media just didn't show.... but if she were in cuffs, I am quite sure it would have leaked out.

[CottonBear]

1. Shame, shame, shame.

:cry:

[Skittles]

2. Fitz has the interests of America as his priority

Starr's priority was always the GOP

[spindrifter]

3. At some point she had to be in cuffs--she was put in jail--and

the handcuffs are part of the process.
But--Fitzg appears to be treating all of the people he has subpoenaed with dignity. He also does not appear to be biased, as was K. St*rr. Putting yourself across as an unbiased fact-seeker lends some integrity to the justice system as it operates in this administration--something we all deserve.

[Catherine Vincent]

5. You may be right.

I am amazed there were no photos of Ms. Judy in handcuffs. I betcha he thought that whitewater case was crap.

[Inland]

4. No leaks, no interviews, no meeting TV crews at the curb

Fitzgerald runs his investigations the way a civil libertarian would want them run. He makes me proud of the system.

[applegrove]

6. Kenneth Starr had to apologize in the end for doing an three year

investigation that "got" the president on something he did at the end of year three.

Fitz - will never have to apologize for anything.

[tinfoilinfor2005]

7. I'm sure Starr rehearsed in front of a mirror every morning.

He thought he was quite the celebrity.

Fitzgerald takes his role seriously and solemnly.

[Catherine Vincent]

8. Kick!