Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton and $400,000 chinese contribution, Ginsberg and legal prostitution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftupnorth Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:06 PM
Original message
Clinton and $400,000 chinese contribution, Ginsberg and legal prostitution
please read this retarded op-ed posted here:http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=164861&mesg_id=164861

I need to dispel the $400,000 contribution from the "red Chinese" to Clinton's campaign for missiles and the Ginsberg legal age at 12 and legal prostitution.

I googled both and all I could find was RW "news" sources

Any help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leftupnorth Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. huh?
Edited on Sat Oct-15-05 04:51 PM by leftupnorth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton? Dispell it by saying it is not relevant.
George W. Bush is the current President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftupnorth Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. absolutely
Edited on Sat Oct-15-05 04:54 PM by leftupnorth
Clinton has been irrelevant for a long time, and i was just going to do that, but if i could work in some pertinent facts where i can, all the more better to smote the knuckle-dragger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No refutation needed
The letter-writer didnt address any of the assertions in your original letter. He stated that you were wrong then changed the subject, instead of pointing out why.

is yammering on about Clinton, some sort of Pavlovian response from these guys? Any stimulis is answered by an anti Clinton rant reflex.

Dogs drool. Right wingers invoke Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftupnorth Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. you might be on to something, there...
I wonder if there has been any research performed on this Pavlovian RW response. Hmmmm.....:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leftupnorth Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i'm sorry
if i offended. i apologize, let's see if i can remove/edit that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just dismiss them as fantasies...
Really, how demented does someone have to be to believe that crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. DeLay and gang 'played' with the Chinese contribution so that they
could make it look like the Clinton admin was dishonest. It was widely stated that they couldn't go further with the charges as they would then expose themselves. In light of what is happeneing to them today - get up to date on DeLay and Fritz stuff and hit them with 'genuine' indictment charges and the penalties (which nvolves prison). Then, ask them who was indicted in the Clinton admin and who went to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC