Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why out Plame BEFORE the Wilson op-ed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Peachhead22 Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:48 PM
Original message
Why out Plame BEFORE the Wilson op-ed?
If my reading comprehension skills are up to snuff, recent news stories and evidence indicate that Libby, Rove and others had already outed Valerie Plame to several reporters well before Joseph Wilson wrote the Niger yellowcake op-ed in the NY Times. Why?

That's basically saying they were trying to discredit Wilson before they knew they needed to discredited him. The timeline doesn't wash.

IMO a CIA agent working on non-proliferation was outed to out a CIA agent working on non-proliferation. Period. Nothing more, nothing less.

That she was married to a guy who eventually became an administration critic is just a convienient coincidence (for them}. It allows them to say they did it because of her husband, instead of they did it because she was on to something incredibly bad and incredibly big. And I mean bigger than fudging the case for war.

What gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think some weeks past
I think you also have to look at the the British documents re: WMD to get the whole picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. yup some are on to this already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm hoping Fitz will explain it all to us, in
excruciating detail. I also think Plame and her CIA undercover work, Brewster Jennings, etc., were the main focus of the admin's efforts to discredit Wilson and, by extension, Plame. Seems to have blown up in their petty little faces though. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wilson had been trying for weeks to get admin to listen..
but they kept brushing him off.

They new it was coming and were trying to head him off at the pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm thoroughly convinced it was all about Brewster & Jennings
the NeoCons and Bush Mafia wanted it destroyed!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What is that? (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. The Brass Plate CIA Proprietary Front Company
that Plame worked undercover for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Didn't they pretty much accomplish that by outing Plame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. i'm with you on that one...
the selling of nukes is right up there with drugs, and all their other defense toys, and big money for these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree. They wanted to out her because she was getting too close to the
Bush Crime Syndicate's WMD money trail. I think she had, or was close to getting, the goods on the Bush Crime Syndicate's trade in terrorism, drugs and WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. If this turns out to be a correct theory....
wouldn't Fitzgerald be all over this? Or would all the information that BJ was compiling be classified and not be disclosed to him by for instance, Valerie Plame, if she has testified, or was interviewed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agates Donating Member (743 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Threat to CIA
It was to threaten any honest CIA people not to tell the truth about the flimsy case for the war. The White House knew that Wilson was telling his story. They didn't wait for him to publish the op-ed. They wanted to hurt Plame and Wilson while letting everyone else in the intelligence community to keep their mouths shut about the lies in the run up to the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wilson himself had been trying to get the Administration to acknowledge
the Niger claims were wrong. When that didn't work, he went to the press and was a source for articles. This was months before his July Op Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Its to close down Brewster & Jennings!!! Thats what this was all
about!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Miller and Libby both knew who the source was
While Wilson remained anonymous, the objective was to discredit Wilson's story. Libby mentioned Valerie to make it look like the trip was a spur of the moment event, unknown by Cheney.

I'm wondering if Judith was the only one to hear the message that the Wilson trip story had no basis. After the original anonymous source stories about Wilson's trip appeared in the Post and the Times, very little attention was paid to Wilson's claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh, Wilson's opposition was very known to the White House.
It has been acknowledged that Wilson was talking to reporters as a confidential source in the months before he wrote the Times op-ed in July. And the WH knew he was talking. The WH was getting out their spin -- basically that Wilson was supporting the CIA faction that was blaming the Bush Administration and was doing so because his WIFE worked at the CIA on nuclear proliferation. They were trying to destroy Wilson's credibility with Washington reporters to move them away from reporting on his Niger findings. It was a conspiracy to "taint" Joe WIlson and in the process they outed a NOC agent. They were trapped in their own tangled web.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Her cover company was investigating Oil company corruption
in the middle east .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Peachhead22, I know this has been answered, but I'll add ...
Edited on Sat Oct-15-05 11:47 PM by Neil Lisst
They DID know Wilson was their problem BEFORE he had his article in July in the NYT. Wilson was serving as a source for stories that were blowing the lid off the yellow cake story in JUNE. Libby and Rove had learned that the source for those stories was Joe Wilson.

How did they learn? They have sources, and Judith Miller might be one of them. The fact is, they knew it was Wilson at least 2 weeks before his article came out.

Someone asked why they were on it before then. They are on ANY significant problem, and this was a big one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC